Advertisement

Information Systems Success: The Project Management Information System for ERP Projects

  • Thanh D. Nguyen
  • Dat T. Nguyen
  • Tuan M. Nguyen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 165)

Abstract

Project Management Information System (PMIS) is a core stone for organizations to plan and implement successfully their projects. Hence, PMIS success is also a central topic for both academicians and practitioners. Based on well–known Information Systems Success model (DeLone & McLean), highly cited Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and the related works, a success model of PMIS for ERP projects is proposed and validated. A survey study with path analysis of 160 participants who have used the PMIS for the ERP projects at FPT Information System – a member of the FPT Group that shows all hypotheses empirically supported. The findings indicate that ERP project’s success is determined by PMIS user satisfaction that in turn is influenced by user ease of use, system quality, functional–information quality, and support–service quality.

Keywords

ERP Information systems PMIS Project success 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to say thank to four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Ajzen, I.: From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action Control, pp. 11–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahlemann, F.: Towards a conceptual reference model for project management information systems. Int. J. Project Manage. 27(1), 19–30 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ali, A., Anbari, F., Money, W.: Impact of organizational and project factors on acceptance and usage of project management software and perceived project success. Project Manage. J. 39(2), 5–33 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amami, M., Beghini, G., La Manna, M.: Use of project–management information system for planning information–systems development projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 11(1), 21–28 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braglia, M., Frosolini, M.: An integrated approach to implement project management information systems within the extended enterprise. Int. J. Project Manage. 32(1), 18–29 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caniels, M.C., Bakens, R.J.: The effects of project management information systems on decision making in a multi project environment. Int. J. Project Manage. 30(2), 162–175 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success revisited. In: Proceedings of the HICSS. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten–year update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeToni, A.F., Fornasier, A., Nonino, F.: The impact of implementation process on the perception of enterprise resource planning success. Bus. Process Manage. J. 21(2), 332–352 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doll, W., Deng, X., Raghunathan, T., Torkzadeh, G., Xia, W.: The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: A multigroup invariance analysis of the end–user computing satisfaction instrument. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 21(1), 227–262 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., Tsipouridou, M.: Measuring the success of the Greek taxation information system. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 30(1), 47–56 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    FPT IS: Corporate Profile – FPT Information System (2014). http://fis.com.vn
  16. 16.
    Gable, G., Sedera, D., Chan, T.: Re–conceptualizing information system success: The IS–impact measurement model. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(7), 377–408 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gupta, R., Naqvi, S.K.: A framework for applying critical success factors to ERP implementation projects. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 17(4), 469–490 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., Tatham, R.: Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson, Upper Saddle River (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herroelen, W.: Project scheduling – Theory and practice. Prod. Oper. Manage. 14(4), 413–432 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsu, P.F., Yen, H.R., Chung, J.C.: Assessing ERP post–implementation success at the individual level: Revisiting the role of service quality. Inf. Manage. 52(8), 925–942 (2015). In PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ifinedo, P., Olsen, D.H.: An empirical research on the impacts of organisational decisions’ locus, tasks structure rules, knowledge, and IT function’s value on ERP system success. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(8), 2554–2568 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jaafari, A.: Time and priority allocation scheduling technique for projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 14(5), 289–299 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaiser, M.G., Ahlemann, F.: Measuring project management information systems success: Towards a conceptual model and survey instrument. In: European Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keen, P.G.: MIS research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. In: Proceedings of the ICIS, Philadelphia (1980)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurbel, K.: Groupware extension for a software project management system. Int. J. Project Manage. 12(4), 222–229 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liberatore, M.J., Johnson, B.P.: Factors influencing the usage and selection of project management software. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 50(2), 164–174 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Light, M., Rosser, B., Hayward, S.: Realizing the benefits of project and portfolio management. Gartner (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahaney, R.C., Lederer, A.L.: The role of monitoring and shirking in information systems project management. Int. J. Project Manage. 28(1), 14–25 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mason, R.O.: Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Inf. Manag. 1(4), 219–234 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nguyen, T.D.: A structural model for the success of information systems projects. J. Sci. Technol. Dev. 18(2Q), 109–120 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nguyen, T.D., Cao, T.H.: Structural model for adoption and usage of e–banking in Vietnam. Econ. Dev. J. 220, 116–135 (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nguyen, T.D., Cao, T.H., Tran, N.D.: Structural model for the adoption of online advertising on social network in Vietnam. In: ICACCI, pp. 38–43. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen, T.D., Nguyen, D.T., Cao, T.H.: Acceptance and use of information system: E-learning based on cloud computing in Vietnam. In: Linawati, Mahendra, M.S., Neuhold, E.J., Tjoa, A.M., You, I. (eds.) ICT-EurAsia 2014. LNCS, vol. 8407, pp. 139–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nguyen, T.D., Nguyen, T.M., Pham, Q.-T., Misra, S.: Acceptance and use of e-learning based on cloud computing: the role of consumer innovativeness. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A.M.A., Torre, C., Rocha, J.G., Falcão, M.I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part V. LNCS, vol. 8583, pp. 159–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nwankpa, J.K.: ERP system usage and benefit: A model of antecedents and outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 335–344 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pedhazur, E.J.: Structural equation models with observed variables: Path analysis. In: Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, pp. 765–840 (1997)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(3), 236–263 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pham, L., Cao, N.Y., Nguyen, T.D., Tran, P.T.: Structural models for e–banking adoption in Vietnam. Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 31–48 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rai, A., Lang, S.S., Welker, R.B.: Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(1), 50–69 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rai, A., Maruping, L.M., Venkatesh, V.: Offshore information systems project success: The Role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Q. 33(3), 617–641 (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ravasan, A., Nabavi, A., Mansouri, T.: Can organizational structure influence ERP success? Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manage. 8(1), 39–59 (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Raymond, L., Bergeron, F.: Impact of project management information systems on project performance. In: Schwindt, C., Zimmermann, J. (eds.) Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling, vol. 2, pp. 1339–1354. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., Chowa, C.: Information system success: Individual and organizational determinants. Manage. Sci. 52(12), 1849–1864 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seddon, P.B.: A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf. Syst. Res. 8(3), 240–253 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Seddon, P.B.: Implications for strategic IS research of the resource–based theory of the firm: A reflection. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23(4), 257–269 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shannon, C., Weaver, W.: Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. In: Mathematical Theory of Communications, pp. 1–28 (1949)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Urbach, N., Muller, B.: The updated DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. In: Dwivedi, Y.K., Wade, M.R., Schneberger, S.L. (eds.) Information Systems Theory, pp. 1–18. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Urbach, N., Smolnik, S. Riempp, G.: Development and validation of a model for assessing the success of employee portals. In: ECIS Proceedings (2009)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    White, D., Fortune, J.: Current practice in project management – An empirical study. Int. J. Project Manage. 20(1), 1–11 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P., Cicmil, S.: Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government–funded research network. Int. J. Project Manage. 24(8), 638–649 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thanh D. Nguyen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dat T. Nguyen
    • 2
  • Tuan M. Nguyen
    • 2
  1. 1.Banking University of Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.HCMC University of TechnologyHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations