Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Molecular Diagnosis of Endophthalmitis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endophthalmitis

Abstract

Endophthalmitis requires rapid microbiological investigations to confirm diagnosis. Identification of the microorganism involved is important for several reasons: to quickly confirm the infectious nature of inflammation, to justify and adapt the intravitreal antibiotic therapy, to rationalize the surgical decision for therapeutic vitrectomy, to precisely determine the epidemiology of the disease, and to reevaluate surgical hygienic procedures. In recent years, a number of assays based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been implemented in microbiology laboratories for diagnosis of infectious diseases: pan-bacterial conventional PCR based on amplification of the 16SrRNA gene, specific PCR and real-time PCR tests developed for detection of specific pathogens, multiplex PCR or real-time PCR, which are variants of these techniques allowing simultaneous detection of multiple DNA targets in a single reaction, and quantitative real-time PCR. The contribution of PCR to the diagnosis of bacterial or fungal endophthalmitis is described. To optimize the detection of microorganisms causing endophthalmitis, it is preferable to obtain an early sample of vitreous and to apply both conventional culture and molecular biology techniques (pan-bacterial PCR or real-time PCR), since the two approaches are complementary. Recent molecular techniques allow rapid and specific microbiological diagnosis, can screen rapidly for the presence of a large number of infectious antigens, and can quantify bacterial loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kresloff MS, Castellarin AA, Zarbin MA. Endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;43:193–224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiquet C, Maurin M, Thuret G, et al., French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group. Analysis of diluted vitreous samples from vitrectomy is useful in eyes with severe acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2437–41.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Okhravi N, Adamson P, Lightman S. Use of PCR in endophthalmitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2000;8:189–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiquet C, Cornut P-L, Benito Y, et al., French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group. Eubacterial PCR for bacterial detection and identification in 100 acute postcataract surgery endophthalmitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1971–78. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1377.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cornut P-L, Chiquet C, Bron A, et al., FRIENDS Group. Microbiologic identification of bleb-related delayed-onset endophthalmitis caused by moraxella species. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:541–5. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31816299ec.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Namdari H, Kintner K, Jackson BA, et al. Abiotrophia species as a cause of endophthalmitis following cataract extraction. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1564–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee AY, Akileswaran L, Tibbetts MD, et al. Identification of torque teno virus in culture- negative endophthalmitis by representational deep DNA sequencing. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:524–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ogawa M, Sugita S, Watanabe K, et al. Novel diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis by broad-range real-time PCR detection of fungal 28S ribosomal DNA. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Für Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:1877–83. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2015-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brillat-Zaratzian E, Bron A, Aptel F, et al. FRIENDS Group: clinical and microbiological characteristics of post-filtering surgery endophthalmitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Für Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:101–7. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2503-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lohmann CP, Heeb M, Linde HJ, et al. Diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis after cataract surgery by polymerase chain reaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:821–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugita S, Shimizu N, Watanabe K, et al. Diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis by broad-range quantitative PCR. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:345–9. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.171504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiquet C, Lina G, Benito Y, et al. Polymerase chain reaction identification in aqueous humor of patients with postoperative endophthalmitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:635–41. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.12.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knox CM, Cevallos V, Margolis TP, Dean D. Identification of bacterial pathogens in patients with endophthalmitis by 16S ribosomal DNA typing. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:511–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lohmann CP, Linde HJ, Reischl U. Improved detection of microorganisms by polymerase chain reaction in delayed endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1047–51; discussion 1051–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Okhravi N, Adamson P, Carroll N, et al. PCR-based evidence of bacterial involvement in eyes with suspected intraocular infection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3474–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson CC, Chimetto L, Edwards RA, et al. Microbial genomic taxonomy. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:913. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-913.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Devulder G, Perrière G, Baty F, Flandrois JP. BIBI, a bioinformatics bacterial identification tool. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:1785–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Anand AR, Madhavan HN, Therese KL. Use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA probe hybridization to determine the Gram reaction of the infecting bacterium in the intraocular fluids of patients with endophthalmitis. J Infect. 2000;41:221–6. doi:10.1053/jinf.2000.0731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carroll NM, Jaeger EE, Choudhury S, et al. Detection of and discrimination between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in intraocular samples by using nested PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1753–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldschmidt P, Degorge S, Benallaoua D, et al. New test for the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1089–95. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.152181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fenollar F, Raoult D. Molecular genetic methods for the diagnosis of fastidious microorganisms. APMIS Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand. 2004;112:785–807. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11211-1206.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugita S, Kamoi K, Ogawa M, et al. Detection of Candida and Aspergillus species DNA using broad-range real-time PCR for fungal endophthalmitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Für Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:391–8. doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1819-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Joseph CR, Lalitha P, Sivaraman KR, et al. Real-time polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:1031–1037.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bispo PJ, de Melo GB, Hofling-Lima AL, Pignatari AC. Detection and gram discrimination of bacterial pathogens from aqueous and vitreous humor using real-time PCR assays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:873–81. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Therese KL, Anand AR, Madhavan HN. Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1078–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sugita S, Ogawa M, Shimizu N, et al. Use of a comprehensive polymerase chain reaction system for diagnosis of ocular infectious diseases. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1761–8. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Melo GB, Bispo PJ, Campos Pignatari AC, Höfling-Lima AL. Real-time polymerase chain reaction test to discriminate between contamination and intraocular infection after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1244–50. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aarthi P, Bagyalakshmi R, Therese KL, et al. Optimization and application of a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction to determine the bacterial viability in infectious endophthalmitis. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:1114–20. doi:10.3109/02713683.2012.704476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sakai T, Kohzaki K, Watanabe A, et al. Use of DNA microarray analysis in diagnosis of bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2012;6:321–6. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S29230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fisch A, Salvanet A, Prazuck T, et al. Epidemiology of infective endophthalmitis in France. The French Collaborative Study Group on Endophthalmitis. Lancet Lond Engl. 1991;338:1373–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Anonymous. Microbiologic factors and visual outcome in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:830–46.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Kelsey SF, et al. Microbiologic yields and complication rates of vitreous needle aspiration versus mechanized vitreous biopsy in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Retina Phila Pa. 1999;19:98–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, et al. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:1–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hassan IJ, MacGowan AP, Cook SD. Endophthalmitis at the Bristol Eye Hospital: an 11-year review of 47 patients. J Hosp Infect. 1992;22:271–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schrader W. Endogenous candida endophthalmitis. Early diagnosis and early vitrectomy improve the prognosis. Fortschritte Ophthalmol Z Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges. 1990;87:331–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hykin PG, Tobal K, McIntyre G, et al. The diagnosis of delayed post-operative endophthalmitis by polymerase chain reaction of bacterial DNA in vitreous samples. J Med Microbiol. 1994;40:408–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bagyalakshmi R, Madhavan HN, Therese KL. Development and application of multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the etiological diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis. J Postgrad Med. 2006;52:179–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sowmya P, Madhavan HN. Diagnostic utility of polymerase chain reaction on intraocular specimens to establish the etiology of infectious endophthalmitis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19:812–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cornut P-L, Thuret G, Creuzot-Garcher C, et al., French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group. Relationship between baseline clinical data and microbiologic spectrum in 100 patients with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. Retina Phila Pa. 2012;32:549–57. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182205996.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bharathi MJ, Rameshkumar G, Ramakrishnan R, et al. Comparative evaluation of uniplex, nested, semi-nested, multiplex and nested multiplex PCR methods in the identification of microbial etiology of clinically suspected infectious endophthalmitis. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38:550–62. doi:10.3109/02713683.2013.772205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cornut P-L, Boisset S, Romanet J-P, et al. Principles and applications of molecular biology techniques for the microbiological diagnosis of acute post-operative endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;59(3):286–303. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sakai H, Procop GW, Kobayashi N, et al. Simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci in positive blood cultures by real-time PCR with two fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe sets. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5739–44. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.12.5739-5744.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Essex RW, Yi Q, Charles PG, Allen PJ. Post-traumatic endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2015–22. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Affeldt JC, Flynn HW, Forster RK, et al. Microbial endophthalmitis resulting from ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kunimoto DY, Das T, Sharma S, et al. Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates: part II. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis Research Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:242–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Peyman GA, Carroll CP, Raichand M. Prevention and management of traumatic endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1980;87:320–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gupta A, Srinivasan R, Kaliaperumal S, Saha I. Post-traumatic fungal endophthalmitis–a prospective study. Eye Lond Engl. 2008;22:13–7. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Forster RK, Abbott RL, Gelender H. Management of infectious endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1980;87:313–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Anand AR, Therese KL, Madhavan HN. Spectrum of aetiological agents of postoperative endophthalmitis and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000;48:123–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jaeger EE, Carroll NM, Choudhury S, et al. Rapid detection and identification of Candida, Aspergillus, and Fusarium species in ocular samples using nested PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2902–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Anand A, Madhavan H, Neelam V, Lily T. Use of polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:326–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hidalgo JA, Alangaden GJ, Eliott D, et al. Fungal endophthalmitis diagnosis by detection of Candida albicans DNA in intraocular fluid by use of a species-specific polymerase chain reaction assay. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:1198–201. doi:10.1086/315333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bagyalakshmi R, Therese KL, Madhavan HN. Application of semi-nested polymerase chain reaction targeting internal transcribed spacer region for rapid detection of panfungal genome directly from ocular specimens. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:261–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ferrer C, Alio J, Rodriguez A, et al. Endophthalmitis caused by Fusarium proliferatum. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5372–5. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.10.5372-5375.2005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tarai B, Gupta A, Ray P, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for early diagnosis of post-operative fungal endophthalmitis. Indian J Med Res. 2006;123:671–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France

    Christophe Chiquet MD, PhD

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France

    Christophe Chiquet MD, PhD

  3. Department of Microbiology, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France

    Sandrine Boisset PharmD, PhD & Max Maurin MD, PhD

  4. Department of Microbiology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France

    Sandrine Boisset PharmD, PhD & Max Maurin MD, PhD

  5. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lyon, Lyon, France

    Pierre-Loïc Cornut MD, PhD

  6. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Lyon, France

    Pierre-Loïc Cornut MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Christophe Chiquet MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandrine Boisset PharmD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pierre-Loïc Cornut MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Max Maurin MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Chiquet MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Marlene L. Durand

  2. Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Joan W. Miller

  3. Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA

    Lucy H. Young

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiquet, C., Boisset, S., Cornut, PL., Maurin, M. (2016). The Molecular Diagnosis of Endophthalmitis. In: Durand, M., Miller, J., Young, L. (eds) Endophthalmitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29231-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29231-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29229-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29231-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation