Advertisement

Storyboards as a Lingua Franca in Multidisciplinary Design Teams

  • Mieke Haesen
  • Davy Vanacken
  • Kris Luyten
  • Karin Coninx
Chapter

Abstract

Design, and in particular user-centered design processes for interactive systems, typically involve multidisciplinary teams. The different and complementary perspectives of the team members enrich the design ideas and decisions, and the involvement of all team members is needed to achieve a user interface for a system that carefully considers all aspects, ranging from user needs to technical requirements. The difficulty is getting all team members involved in the early stages of design and communicating design ideas and decisions in a way that all team members can understand them and use them in an appropriate way in later stages of the process. This chapter describes the COMuICSer storyboarding technique, which presents the scenario of use of a future system in a way that is understandable for each team member, regardless of their background. Based on an observational study in which multidisciplinary teams collaboratively created storyboards during a co-located session, we present recommendations for the facilitation of co-located collaborative storyboarding sessions for multidisciplinary teams and digital tool support for this type of group work.

Keywords

Team Member Multidisciplinary Team International Standard Organization Digital Tool Personal Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants of our observational study. The work presented in this chapter is supported by the IWT project AMASS++ (SBO-060051) and the EU FP7 project COnCEPT (610725).

References

  1. Atasoy B, Martens J-B (2011) STORIFY: a tool to assist design teams in envisioning and discussing user experience. In: Proceedings of the 2011 conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA’11. ACM, New York, pp 2263–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avila-Garcia MS, Trefethen AE, Brady M, Gleeson F (2010) Using interactive and multi-touch technology to support decision making in multidisciplinary team meetings. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 23rd international symposium on computer-based medical systems, CBMS’10. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey BP, Konstan JA, Carlis JV (2001) DEMAIS: designing multimedia applications with interactive storyboards. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on Multimedia, MULTIMEDIA’01. ACM, New York, pp 241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartindale T, Sheikh A, Taylor N, Wright P, Olivier P (2012) StoryCrate: tabletop storyboarding for live film production. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’12. ACM, New York, pp 169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown J, Lindgaard G, Biddle R (2008) Stories, sketches, and lists: developers and interaction designers interacting through artefacts. In: Proceedings of the Agile’08. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 39–50Google Scholar
  6. Buxton B (2007) Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll JM (2000) Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng K (2012) See what I mean: how to use comics to communicate ideas. Rosenfeld Media, BrooklynGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidoff S, Lee MK, Dey AK, Zimmerman J (2007) Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on ubiquitous computing, UbiComp’07. Springer, Berlin, pp 429–446Google Scholar
  10. Dietz P, Leigh D (2001) DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST’01. ACM, New York, pp 219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haesen M, Coninx K, Van den Bergh J, Luyten K (2008) MuiCSer: a process framework for multi-disciplinary user-centred software engineering processes. In: Proceedings of the second conference on human-centered software engineering, HCSE’08, and 7th international workshop on task models and diagrams, TAMODIA’08. Springer, Berlin, pp 150–165Google Scholar
  12. Haesen M, Luyten K, Coninx K (2009) Get your requirements straight: storyboarding revisited. In: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC13 international conference on human-computer interaction, INTERACT’09. Springer, Berlin, pp 546–549Google Scholar
  13. Haesen, M, Meskens J, Luyten K, Coninx K (2010) Draw me a storyboard: incorporating principles and techniques of comics to ease communication and artefact creation in user-centered design. In: 24th BCS conference on human computer interaction, HCI’10, British Computer Society. Swinton, pp 133–142 Google Scholar
  14. Haesen M, Van den Bergh J, Meskens J, Luyten K, Degrandsart S, Demeyer S, Coninx K (2011) Using storyboards to integrate models and informal design knowledge. In: Model-driven development of advanced user interfaces. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haller M, Billinghurst M, Leithinger D, Leitner J, Seifried T (2005) Coeno: enhancing face-to-face collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on augmented tele-existence, ICAT’05. ACM, New York, pp 40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harada K, Tanaka E, Ogawa R, Hara Y (1996) Anecdote: a multimedia storyboarding system with seamless authoring support. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on multimedia, MULTIMEDIA’96. ACM, New York, pp 341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holtzblatt K, Wendell JB, Wood S (2004) Rapid contextual design: a how-to guide to key techniques for user-centered design (interactive technologies). Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  18. International Standards Organization (2010) ISO 9241-210. Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: human-centred design for interactive systemsGoogle Scholar
  19. Kantola N, Jokela T (2007) SVSb: simple and visual storyboards: developing a visualisation method for depicting user scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on computer-human interaction: entertaining user interfaces, OZCHI’07. ACM, New York, pp 49–56Google Scholar
  20. Kathy R, Alan E, Katherine E, Clifton F, Meredith Ringel M, Chia S, Sam S, FD Vernier (2005) iDwidgets: parameterizing widgets by user identity. In: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP TC13 international conference on human-computer interaction, INTERACT’05. Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1124–1128Google Scholar
  21. Landay JA, Myers BA (1995) Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’95. ACM, New York, pp 43–50Google Scholar
  22. Landay JA, Myers BA (1996) Sketching storyboards to illustrate interface behaviors. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems: common ground, CHI’96. ACM, New York, pp 193–194Google Scholar
  23. Li Y, Landay JA (2008) Activity-based prototyping of ubicomp applications for long-lived, everyday human activities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’08. ACM, New York, pp 1303–1312Google Scholar
  24. Lindgaard G, Dillon R, Trbovich P, White R, Fernandes G, Lundahl S, Pinnamaneni A (2006) User needs analysis and requirements engineering: theory and practice. Interact Comput 18(1):47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCloud S (1993) Understanding comics: the invisible art. Tundra Publishing Ltd, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. McQuaid HL, Goel A, McManus M (2003) When you can’t talk to customers: using storyboards and narratives to elicit empathy for users. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, DPPI’03. ACM, New York, pp 120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ozenc FK, Kim M, Zimmerman J, Oney S, Myers B (2010) How to support designers in getting hold of the immaterial material of software. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’10. ACM, New York, pp 2513–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pedell S, Smith W (2005) Relating context to interface: an evaluation of picture scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australia conference on computer-human interaction: citizens online: considerations for today and the future, OZCHI’05, Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (CHISIG) of Australia, 2005, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  29. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Pruitt J, Adlin T (2006) The persona lifecycle: keeping people in mind throughout product design. Morgan Kaufmann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Redmond-Pyle D, Moore A (1995) Graphical user interface design and evaluation. Prentice Hall, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Remy C, Weiss M, Ziefle M, Borchers J (2010) A pattern language for interactive tabletops in collaborative workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 15th European conference on pattern languages of programs, EuroPLoP’10. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Roam D (2008) Back of the napkin: solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. Portfolio, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryall K, Forlines C, Shen C, Morris MR (2004) Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, CSCW’04. ACM, New York, pp 284–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryall K, Esenther A, Forlines C, Shen C, Sam S, Morris MR, Everitt K, Vernier FD (2006) Identity-differentiating widgets for multiuser interactive surfaces. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26(5):56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt D, Chong MK, Gellersen H (2010) IdLenses: dynamic personal areas on shared surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces, ITS’10. ACM, New York, pp 131–134Google Scholar
  37. Scott SD, Sheelagh C, Inkpen KM (2004) Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, CSCW’04. ACM, New York, pp 294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shoemaker GBD, Inkpen KM (2001) Single display privacyware: augmenting public displays with private information. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’01. ACM, New York, pp 522–529Google Scholar
  39. Truong KN, Hayes GR, Abowd GD (2006) Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, DIS’06. ACM, New York, pp 12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Lelie C (2006) The value of storyboards in the product design process. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10(2–3):159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vanacken D (2012) Touch-based interaction and collaboration in walk-up-and-use and multi-user environments. PhD thesis, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  42. Wahid S, Branham SM, Scott McCrickard D, Harrison S (2010) Investigating the relationship between imagery and rationale in design. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, DIS’10. ACM, New York, pp 75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mieke Haesen
    • 1
  • Davy Vanacken
    • 1
  • Kris Luyten
    • 1
  • Karin Coninx
    • 1
  1. 1.Hasselt University – tUL – iMindsExpertise Centre for Digital MediaDiepenbeekBelgium

Personalised recommendations