Democracy on the Move?

The Potential Link Between Circular Migration and Democratization
Chapter
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 12)

Abstract

This chapter argues that circular migration may contribute to transformation in areas that have so far been rarely touched upon in the debate. Besides the transfer of financial remittances and professional skills, political and (un)democratic attitudes and practices may also be diffused through temporary or circular migration. Based on a survey among 1000 Philippine return migrants from six destinations and qualitative research, this chapter shows that at an individual level, the migration experience may have a positive or negative influence on the democratic attitudes of migrants. This effect might be enforced through circular migration, because it provides the migrant with a regular “reality check” in comparing home and destination country. The findings are discussed with reference to a clearly democratic country (Japan), a clearly authoritarian state (Saudi Arabia) and the “special case” of Hong Kong. For policy makers, the case studies allow to draw a conclusion that opens up new vistas: If circular migrants should contribute to the development in their home countries, it is of utmost importance to provide them with opportunities for organizing and political participation while being abroad.

Keywords

Migration Democratisation Circular migration Philippines Return migrants Development Hong Kong Saudi Arabia Japan Social movement 

References

  1. Brubaker, R. (2005). The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1969). Children in the political system. Origins of political legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fargues, P. (2008). Circular migration: Is it relevant for the South and East of the Mediterranean?. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, CARIM-AS Analytic and Synthetic Notes- Circular Migration Series, 2008/40. http://www.eui.eu/Personal/fargues/Documents/CARIM_AS%26N_2008_40.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2012.
  5. Glick Schiller, N., Basch, L., & Blanc-Szanton, C. (Eds.). (1992). Towards a transnational perspective on migration. Race, class, ethnicity, and nationalism reconsidered. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Global Commission on International Migration (GCIM). (2005). Migration in an interconnected world: New directions for action. Report of the Global Commission on International Migration. http://www.refworld.org/docid/435f81814.html. Accessed 14 Apr 2012.
  7. Hollifield, J. F. (2008). The politics of international migration. How can we bring the state back in? In C. B. Brettell & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Migration theory. Talking across disciplines (2nd ed., pp. 183–237). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hugo, G. (2009). Circular migration and development: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Multicultural Centre of Prague (migrationonline.cz). http://aa.ecn.cz/img_upload/6334c0c7298d6b396d213ccd19be5999/GHugo_CircularMigrationAndDevelopment.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2012.
  9. Human Rights Watch (HRW). (2004). Bad dreams: Exploitation and abuse of migrant workers in Saudi Arabia. 16(5). http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/saudi0704.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2012.
  10. Huymans, J. (2000). The European union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Itzigsohn, J., & Villacrés, D. (2008). Migrant political transnationalism and the practice of democracy: Dominican external voting rights and Salvadoran home town associations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(4), 664–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kapur, D. (2003). Remittances: The new development Mantra?. Paper prepared for the G-24 Technical, Discussion Paper Series, 29. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  13. Kessler, C., & Rother, S. (2016). Democratization through migration? Political remittances and participation of Philippine return migrants. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  14. Law, L. (2002). Sites of transnational activism. Filipino non-government organizations in Hong Kong. In B. S. A. Yeo, P. Teo, & S. Huang (Eds.), Gender politics in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 205–222). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levitt, P., & Jaworsky, B. N. (2007). Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Newland, K., Agunias, D. R., & Terrazas, A. (2008). Learning by doing: Experiences of circular migration. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute (MPI).Google Scholar
  20. Parreñas, R. S. (2006). Children of global migration. Transnational families and gendered woes. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pérez-Armendáriz, C., & Crow, D. (2010). Do migrants remit democracy? International migration and political beliefs and behaviour in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(1), 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Piper, N. (2009). Temporary migration and political remittances: The role of organisational networks in the transnationalisation of human rights. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 8(2), 215–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piper, N., & Rother, S. (2011). Transnational inequalities, transnational responses: The politicization of migrant rights in Asia. In B. Rehbein (Ed.), Globalization and inequality in emerging societies (pp. 235–255). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodriguez, R. M. (2010). Migrants for export. How the Philippine state brokers labour to the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rojas, H. S. (2005). Overseas absentee voting. The Philippine experience. Quezon City: Centre for Migrant Advocacy.Google Scholar
  26. Rother, S. (2009a). Changed in migration? Philippine return migrants and (un)-democratic remittances. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 8(2), 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rother, S. (2009b). Graswurzel Global: Der Asian Migrants’ Coordinating Body (AMCB) in Hongkong. In U. Hoering, O. Pye, W. Schaffar, & C. Wichterich (Eds.), Globalisierung bringt Bewegung. Lokale Kämpfe und transnationale Vernetzungen (pp. 136–151). Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  28. Rother, S. (2009c). Transnational political spaces: Political activism of Philippine labour migrants in Hong Kong. In J. V. Tigno (Ed.), Changing dynamics in Filipino overseas migration: Nationalism, transnationalism, regionalism and the state (pp. 109–140). Quezon City: Philippine Migration Research Network and Philippine Social Science Council Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Rother, S. (2010). Inseln der Überzeugung nicht in Sicht: Der Nationalstaat, NGOs und die globale Governance von Migration. ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 20(3–4), 409–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rüland, J., Kessler, C., & Rother, S. (2009). Democratization through international migration? Explorative thoughts on a novel research agenda. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 8(2), 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sim, A. (2009). Women versus the state: Organizing resistance and contesting exploitation in Indonesian labour migration to Hong Kong. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 18(1), 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skeldon, R. (2010). Managing migration for development: Is circular migration the answer? The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, XI(Winter/Spring), 21–33.Google Scholar
  33. Solomon, M. S. (2009). State-led migration, democratic legitimacy, and deterritorialization: The Philippines’ labour export model. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 8(2), 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tigno, J. V. (2004). Governance and public policy making in the Philippines: RA 8042 and deregulating the overseas employment sector. Philippine Political Science Journal, 48(25), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Triandafyllidou, A. (2010). Towards a better understanding of circular migration. METOIKOS concept paper. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Um, K. (2007). Political remittance: Cambodian diasporas in conflict and post conflict. In H. Smith & P. Stares (Eds.), Diasporas in conflict. Peace-makers or peace-wreckers? (pp. 253–279). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  38. van Amersfoort, H. (2004). Gabriel Sheffer and the Diaspora experience. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational studies, 13(2/3), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Venturini, A. (2008). Circular migration as an employment strategy for Mediterranean countries (CARIM Analytic and Synthetic Notes, CARIM-AS 2008/39). http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/8390/CARIM_AS%26N_2008_39.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 16 June 2012.
  40. Vertovec, S. (2007). Circular migration: The way forward in global policy? (IMI Working Papers, Vol. 4). Oxford: International Migration Institute (IMI).Google Scholar
  41. Waever, O., Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M., Lemaitre, P., et al. (Eds.). (1993). Identity, migration and the new security agenda in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  42. Wee, V., & Sim, A. (2003). Transnational labour networks in female labour migration: Mediating between southeast Asian women workers and international labour markets (IMI Working Papers, Vol. 49). Hong Kong: Southeast Asia Research Centre.Google Scholar
  43. Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2008). The role of ordinary people in democratization. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wickramasekara, P. (2011). Circular migration: A triple win or a dead end (GURN Discussion Paper, 15). Global Union Research Network (GURN).Google Scholar
  45. Wise, R. D., Covarrubias, H. M., & Puentes, R. (2010). Reframing the debate on migration, development and human rights: Fundamental elements. International Network on Migration and Development (INMD). http://rimd.reduaz.mx/documentos_miembros/ReframingtheDebate.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2011.
  46. World Bank. (2010). Migration and remittances factbook 2011 (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review of Japan Series, 61(2), 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Albert-Ludwigs-UniversityFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations