How to Cope with Disturbances in Biped Locomotion?

Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 55)


It is expected that the humanoid robots of the near future will ‘live’ and work in a common environment with humans. This imposes the requirement that their operational efficiency ought to be close to that of men. The main prerequisite to achieve this is to ensure the robot’s efficient motion that is its ability to compensate for the ever-present disturbances. The work considers the strategies of how to compensate for the disturbances of different intensities: small which are permanently present and large that jeopardize the robot’s dynamic balance instantly. It was illustrated that those two classes of disturbances require quite different compensation approaches.


Humanoid robot Biped locomotion Small disturbances Large disturbances Dynamic balance 



This work was in part supported by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia under contract III44008, and in part by the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Provincial Secretariat for Science and Technological Development, Serbia, under contract 114-451-2116/2011-03.


  1. 1.
    Fukuda, T., Michelini, R., Potkonjak, V., Tzafestas, S., Valavanis, K., Vukobratović, M.: How far away is “artificial man”. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 66−73 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Juričić, D., Vukobratović, M.: Mathematical Modeling of Biped Walking Systems. ASME Publlications. 72-WA/BHF-13 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vukobratović, M.: How to control the artificial anthropomorphic systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-3, 497−507 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vukobratović, M.: Legged Locomotion Systems and Anthropomorphic Mechanisms, Mihajlo Pupin Institute, Belgrade, (1975); also published in Japanese by Nikkan Shimbun Ltd. Tokyo (1976), in Russian by “MIR”, Moscow (1976), in Chinese, Beijing (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vukobratović, M., Borovac, B., Surla, D., Stokić, D.: Biped Locomotion—Dynamics, Stability Control and Application. Springer, Berlin (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vukobratović, M., Borovac, B.: Zero-moment point—thirty five years of its life. Int. J. Humanoid Rob. 1(1), 157–173 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vukobratović, M., Borovac, B.: Note on the article, zero-moment point—thirty five years of its Life. Int. J. Humanoid Rob. 2(2), 225–227 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breniere, Y., Bril, B.: Development of postural control of gravity forces in children during the first 5 years of walking. Exp. Brain Res. 121(3), 255–262 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vukobratović, M., Borovac, B., Potkonjak, V.: Towards a unified understanding of basic notions and terms in humanoid robotics. Robotica 25, 87–101 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vukobratović, M., Borovac, B., Raković, M., Potkonjak, V., Milinović, M.: On some aspects of humanoid robots gait synthesis and control at small disturbances. Int. J. Humanoid Rob. 5(1), 225–227 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Borovac, B., Nikolić, M., Raković, M.: How to compensate for the disturbances that jeopardize dynamic balance of a humanoid robot? Int. J. Humanoid Rob. 8(3), 533–578 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vukobratović, M., Potkonjak, V., Borovac, B., Babković, K.: Simulation model of general human and humanoid motion. Multibody Sys. Dyn. 17(1), 71–96 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mihajlo Pupin InstituteBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of Technical SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations