Skip to main content

Gastric Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 880 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of induction chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer has been to reduce the risk of local recurrence and distal recurrence after gastrectomy. Results of early studies in treating both early and advanced gastric cancers have been very encouraging so that a prospective randomized trial is presently being conducted.

Traditionally, the common objective of induction chemotherapy has been to reduce risk of distant disease recurrence. The rationale for a risk-based approach to definitive local treatment individualized at diagnosis (and not after assessment of response to induction chemotherapy), avoiding unnecessary and potentially toxic concomitant chemoradiotherapy for selected patients.

Giving chemotherapy before other treatment has many theoretical advantages. Induction chemotherapy can result in down-staging tumors, thus increasing the rate of more conserving or radical surgery.

In cases of more advanced disease, induction chemotherapy can render inoperable tumors resectable. Other advantages of induction therapy include the ability to obtain information about tumor response, which can be used to study the biologic effects of chemotherapy and assess long-term disease-free and overall survival.

Induction chemotherapy as a component of primary treatment has been shown in several studies and meta-analyses to decrease the incidence of metastatic disease developing.

Now the terms induction, primary, preoperative, basal, and neoadjuvant are all used to describe chemotherapy given as initial therapy.

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, accounting for more than 20 deaths per 100,000 population annually in East Asia, Eastern Europe, and parts of Central and South America.

Gastric cancer is also the second most frequent cause of cancer death after lung cancer in Japan (despite the markedly higher curability obtained by early detection and surgery than in Western countries), because advanced or recurrent gastric cancer shows a poor prognosis. The development of effective standard chemotherapy is much needed.

The prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer who do not undergo surgery or who undergo non-curative therapeutic chemotherapy alone is unlikely to have sufficient impact to effect long-term survival.

Combined induction chemotherapy and radical surgery may be a more effective approach in treatment of unresectable cancers. However, one prerequisite of preoperative chemotherapy is that it should not cause such serious impairment of vital functions as to subvert the performance of invasive surgery under general anesthesia. To achieve a good local response without severe toxicity, chemotherapy must obtain a high drug concentration in the tumor yet have a low level in the peripheral blood. Since around the 1950s (Taguchi T, Nakamura H, editors. Arterial infusion chemotherapy. Tokyo: Japanese Journal Cancer and Chemother Publishers; 1994. ISBN 0385-0684), many reports attest to the clinical benefit of regional chemotherapy for several malignancies such as head and neck cancer, soft parts sarcoma, and metastatic liver cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Taguchi T, Nakamura H, editors. Arterial infusion chemotherapy. Tokyo: Japanese Journal Cancer and Chemother Publishers; 1994. ISBN 0385-0684.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shiraha Y, et al. Intraarterial infusion of anti-cancer drugs for malignant tumors. Diagn Ther (Shindan Chiryou). 1964;53:43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshikawa K. Chemotherapy for gastric cancer evaluation of clinical response followed by intraaortic infusion treatment. Jpn J Cancer Clin. 1973;19:776–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taguchi T, et al. Arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterol Surg (Shoukaki-Geka). 1979;2:1081–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakano Y, et al. Effect of intra-aortic chemotherapy on advanced gastric cancer and colorectal cancers. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 1978;5:321–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujita F, et al. Chemotherapy for the patients with non-resectable gastric cancer of Bormann type IV. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 1977;4:1315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Awane Y, Katayanagi T, Kitamura M, et al. Local intra-arterial therapy with adriamycin and 5-FU in progressive cancer. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 1981;8:1593–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taguchi T, et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg (Shoukaki-Geka). 1974;2:1081–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kitamura M, Awane Y, Katayanagi T, et al. An evaluation of complications associated with continued intra-arterial therapy with carcinostatic drugs. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 1980;7:1432–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nakajima T, et al. Combined intensive chemotherapy and radical surgery for incurable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(3):203–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stephens FO, Adams BG, Grea P. Intra-arterial chemotherapy given preoperatively in the management of carcinoma of the stomach. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;162:370–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aigner KR, Benthin F, Müller H. Celiac axis infusion (CA1) chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. In: Sugarbaker PH, editor. Management of gastric cancer. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1991. p. 357–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A, et al. Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer. 1993;72:37–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glinetius B, Huffmann K, Hoglund U, et al. Initial or delayed chemotherapy with best supportive. Ann Oncol. 1994;5:189–90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pyrhonen S, Kuitumen T, Nyandoto P, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus best supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:587–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, et al. A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma, Fluorouracil versus fluorouracil and doxorubicin versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin. JAMA. 1985;253(14):2061–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wils JA, Klein HO, Wagener DJ, et al. Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin: a step ahead in the treatment of gastric cancer: a trial of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tract Co-operative Group. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:827–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelsen D, Atiqu OT, Saltz L, et al. FAMTX versus etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin: a randomized trial in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:541–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim NK, Park YS, Heo DS, et al. A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer. 1993;71:3813–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Culliman SA, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, et al. Controlled evaluation of three drug combination regimen versus fluorouracil alone in the therapy of advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:412–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cocconi G, Bella M, Zironi S, et al. Fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin combination versus PELF chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(12):2687–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, et al. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4991–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohtsu A, Fuse N, Yoshino T, et al. Future perspectives of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:60–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boku N, Yamamoto S, Shirao K, et al. Randomized phase III study of 5-FU alone versus combination of irinotecan and cisplatin (CP) versus S-1 alone in advanced gastric cancer (JCOG 9912). J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:LBA 4513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, Shirao K, et al. Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegaful plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer: the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study, (JCOG 9205). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:54–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Imamura H, Iiishi H, Tsuburaya A, et al. Randomized phase III study of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC0301/TOP002). Gastrointestinal cancers symposium, Orlando; 2008, abstract 5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jin M, Lu H, Li J, et al. Randomized three-armed phase III study of S-1 monotherapy versus S-1/CDDP versus 5-FU/CDDP in patients with advanced gastric cancer SC-101 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:221s (abstract 4533).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boku N. JCOG trials of systemic chemotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:43–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Takiuchi H. Combination therapy with S-1 and irinotecan (CPT-11) for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:55–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Koizumi W. Clinical development of S-1 plus cisplatin therapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:10–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mori S, Kishimoto H, Tauchi K, et al. Histological complete response in advanced gastric cancer after 2 weeks of S-1 administration as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(2):136–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Matono D, Horiuchi H, Kishimoto Y, et al. A case of advanced gastric cancer with giant lymph node metastasis responding to S-1/CDDP neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2008;35(9):1573–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Takasu N, Nomura T, Fukumoto T, et al. Advanced gastric cancer showing complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CPT-11 and S-1 – a case report. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2009;36(1):111–3.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Masumura K, Ninomiya M, Nishizaki M, et al. A case of long survival in Stage IV gastric carcinoma responding to combination treatment with paclitaxel and 5-FU followed by surgical resection. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2008;35(10):1745–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuo Taguchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taguchi, T. (2016). Gastric Cancer. In: Aigner, K., Stephens, F. (eds) Induction Chemotherapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28773-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28773-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28771-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28773-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics