Certainty Now Uncertain

  • Donald R. Forsdyke


The material bases of information—paper, computer discs—usually scale with information quantity. Large quantities of information usually require large material bases. Conventional wisdom has it that human long-term memory locates within brain tissue, and might be expected to scale with brain size which, in turn, depends on cranial capacity. Large memories, as in those with savant syndrome, should always require large heads. Small heads, as in microcephalics, should always scale with small memories. Neither of these predictions is invariably true. Brain tissue size also depends on ventricle size, which can remain large in some survivors of childhood hydrocephaly, occupying 95% of cranial volume. Yet some of these have normal or advanced intelligence, indicating little impairment of long-term memory. This paradox strongly challenges the scaling hypothesis. The scope of possible explanations (plasticity, redundancy) should not exclude extracorporeal information storage, for which ‘cloud computing’ appears an apt metaphor. It is intriguing to suppose that this view might relate to the cosmic level of subjectivity, deduced by Romanes from Clifford’s “kindred consciousness,” which inspires the modern “Theory of Mind” debate.


  1. 1.
    Wittgenstein L (1969) On Certainty. Anscombe GEM, von Wright GH (eds) Paul D, Anscombe GEM (trans). Basil Blackwell, Oxford, p. 37Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin SC (1805) The Comic Adventures of Old Mother Hubbard and HerDog. Harris, London.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gould SJ (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews 41:587–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jerison HJ (1985) Animal intelligence as encephalization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 308:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garn SM (1963) Culture and the direction of human evolution. Human Biology 35:221–236Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Montgomery SH (2013) The evolutionary history of cetacean brain and body size. Evolution 67:3339–3353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Draaisma D (2015) Forgetting: Myths, Perils and Compensations. Yale University Press, New HavenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forsdyke DR (2014) Long-term memory. Scaling of information to brain size. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:397Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forsdyke DR (2015) Wittgenstein's certainty is uncertain: Brain scans of cured hydrocephalics challenge cherished assumptions. Biological Theory 10(4):336–342Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewin R (1980) Is your brain really necessary? Science 210:1232–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Oliveira MF, Pinto FCG, Nishikuni K et al (2012) Revisiting hydrocephalus as a model to study brain resilience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5:181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hofman MA (2014) Evolution of the human brain: when bigger is better. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 8(15):1–12Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beyerstein BL (1999) Whence cometh the myth that we only use ten percent of our brains? In: Della Sala S (ed) Mind Myths: Exploring Everyday Mysteries of the Mind and Brain. Wiley, New York, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hawks J (2007) Ninety percent of your brain is (not) useless. John Hawks Weblog. http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/brain/development/ten_percent_brain_myth_2007.html
  15. 15.
    Feuillet L, Dufour H, Pelletier J (2007) Brain of a white-collar worker. Lancet 370:362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cock AG, Forsdyke DR (2008). Treasure Your Exceptions. The Science and Life of William Bateson. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Treffert DA (2010) Islands of Genius. Jessica Kingsley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Treffert DA (2014) Accidental genius. Scientific American 311(2):52–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McGaugh JL, LePort A (2014) Remembrance of all things past. Scientific American 310 (2):41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fusi S, Abbott LF (2007) Limits on the memory storage capacity of bounded synapses. Nature Neuroscience 10:485–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Firestein S (2012) Ignorance. How it Drives Science. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brady TF, Konkle T, Alvarez GA, Oliva A (2008) Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:14325–14329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsien RY (2013) Very long-term memories may be stored in the pattern of holes in the perineuronal net. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110:12456–12461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen S, Cai D, Pearce K, Sun PYW, Roberts AC, Glanzman DL (2014) Reinstatement of long-term memory following erasure of its behavioral and synaptic expression in Aplysia. eLife 3:e03896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bateson P, Gluckman P (2011) Plasticity, Robustness, Development and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clark A (2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Majorek MB (2012) Does the brain cause conscious experience? Journal of Consciousness Studies 19:121–144Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tibbetts PE (2014) Where does cognition occur? In one’s embodied/extended environment? Quarterly Review of Biology 89:359–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Doyle AC (1890) The Sign of Four. Spencer Blackett, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hacking I (1995) Rewriting the Soul. Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crick F (1994) The Astonishing Hypothesis. The Scientific Search for the Soul. Simon & Schuster, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wallace AR (1905) My Life. A Record of Events and Opinions, vol 2. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 285–286Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shermer M (2015) Comment on article “When things happen that you can’t explain.” New York Times March 5th Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Forsdyke DR (2015) "A vehicle of symbols and nothing more." George Romanes, theory of mind, information, and Samuel Butler. History of Psychiatry 26:270–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tonini G, Koch C (2015) Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370(1668):20140167Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Penn DC, Povinelli DJ (2007) The lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a 'theory of mind'. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 362:732–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Romanes GJ (1886) The world as an eject. Contemporary Review 50:44–59Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Romanes GJ (1885) Mind and motion. Contemporary Review 48: 74–94 [Religious texts have so shaped our language over millennia that we now use words – such as ‘goodbye’ (presumably ‘God be with you’) – with little thought for religious implications. Thus, it does not follow, since we borrow words from the domain deemed theological, that we necessarily subscribe to the beliefs of that domain.]Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 205–206Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hameroff S, Penrose R (2013) Consciousness in the universe. A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews 11(1):39–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Korf J (2015) Quantum and multidimensional explanations in a neurobiological context of mind. The Neuroscientist 21(4):345–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dyson, F (2012) Science on the Rampage. New York Review of Books 59(6):38–39Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Adolphs R (2015) The unsolved problems in neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19:173–175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ball P (2010) The Music Instinct – How Music Works and Why We Cannot Do Without It. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [In the sense that poetry can serve as an error-correcting device (Chapter 4), so it is possible that music likewise somehow serves the internal language of the brain (mentalese; see Chapter 19). And just as cell operations may stall so that error-correcting enzymes can operate (Chapter 17), so brains may be ‘stalled’ by headaches, so that errors in mentalese can be corrected.]Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schmid MC, et al., (2010) Blindsight depends on the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 466:373–375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Priddle TH, Crow TJ (2013) The protocadherin 11X/Y (PCHD11X/Y) gene pair as determinants of cerebral asymmetry in modern Homo sapiens. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1288:36–47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Olby R (2009) Francis Crick. Hunter of Life’s Secrets. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp 315–338Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Butler S (1965) Ernest Pontifex or The Way of All Flesh. Howard DF (ed) Methuen, London, p. 265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald R. Forsdyke
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical and Molecular SciencesQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations