Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Political Science ((CPS))

  • 393 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews the global context in which the IBSA Dialogue Forum was founded in 2003 and briefly outlines major debates going on in all three countries concerning the extent and content of the IBSA countries’ global engagement. This discussion leads to the basic argument of the present study: beyond the problem of ensuring common positions on specific issues, e.g. in global trade negotiations, IBSA has to grapple with the compatibility of the general strategies by which its members intend to insert themselves into a changing global order. The issue of alleged like-mindedness amongst IBSA member governments and societies emerges as a key understudied aspect of the initiative. This calls for a constructivist perspective which focusses on convergence and divergence among IBSA countries at the level of national discourses and the foreign policy role conceptions negotiated therein. The research focus of the study is defined in two main research questions: (a) How do India, Brazil and South Africa frame their role(s) in the international system, and (b) to what extent are the three framings compatible with the pursuit of the joint IBSA initiative?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “SA-Aca” indicates a South African academic interviewee, “B2010a” refers to a Brazilian official speech held in 2010, see list in the Annex. On the reference system for speeches and interviews see Sect. 3.4.

  2. 2.

    In 2010 a ministerial meeting was held on the margins of the 65th UN General Assembly.

  3. 3.

    Combining public and private actors in issue-specific initiatives of global relevance.

  4. 4.

    In the Non-Aligned Movement, Brazil participates only as observer. South Africa is not a member of the G15.

References

  • Alden C, Vieira MA (2005) The new diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and trilateralism. Third World Q 26(7):1077–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beri R (2008) IBSA dialogue forum: an assessment. Strateg Analysis 32(5):809–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan B, Lawson G (2014) Capitalism and the emergent world order. Int Aff 90(1):71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase R, Hill E, Kennedy P (1996) Pivotal states and U.S strategy. Foreign Aff 75(1):33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase R, Hill E, Kennedy P (1999) The pivotal states. A new framework for U.S. policy in the developing world. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AF, English J (2004) Reforming from the top: a leaders’ 20 summit. United Nations University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa Vaz A (ed) (2006) Intermediate states, regional leadership and security: India, Brazil and South Africa. Editora UnB, Brasilia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieter H (2003) The World Trade Organisation after Cancún. Can the South hold onto its new power?, SWP Comments 2003/C 16. http://www.swpberlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/swpcomment2003_16_dtr.pdf

  • de la Fontaine D (2013) Neue Dynamiken in der Süd-Süd-Kooperation: Indien, Brasilien und Südafrika als Emerging Donors. Springer VS, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemes D (2007) Emerging middle powers’ soft balancing strategy: state and perspectives of the IBSA dialogue forum. GIGA working papers, Nr. 57. http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/wp57_flemes.pdf

  • Flemes D (2009) India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) in the new global order. Interests, strategies and values of the emerging coalition. Int Stud 46(4):401–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemes D (ed) (2010) Regional leadership in the global system. Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemes D (2013) Network powers: strategies of change in the multipolar system. Third World Q 34(6): 1016-1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill S (1995) Globalisation, market globalisation and disciplinary neo-liberalism. Millennium. J Int Stud 24(3):399–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas PM, Haas EB (1995) Learning to learn: improving international governance. Global Gov 1(3):255–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst M (2008) Brazil-India relations: a reciprocal learning process. South Asian Surv 15(1):143–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge JF (2004) A global power shift in the making: is the United States ready? Foreign Aff 83(4):2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell A (2006) Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? Int Aff 82(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husar J, Maihold G, Mair S (eds) (2009) Neue Führungsmächte als Partner deutscher Außenpolitik. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Husar J, Maihold G, Mair S (eds) (2010) Europe and new leading powers. Towards partnership in strategic policy areas. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • IBSA (2003) Brasilia declaration. http://www.ibsa-trilateral.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102&Itemid=46. Accessed 08 Dec 2010

  • Khanna P (2008) The second world: empires and influence in the global order. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan CA (2012) No one’s world: the west, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Pere G, Leininger J, Riestra M, Fues T (2010) The Heiligendamm and emerging powers: more of the same or a genuine global governance innovation? In: Kumar A, Messner D (eds) Power shifts and global governance: challenges from South and North. Anthem Press, London, pp 321–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani K (2009) The new Asian hemisphere: the irresistible shift of global power to the east. Public Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair S, Dierks H (2010) Promotion of democracy and human rights. In: Husar J, Maihold G, Mair S (eds) Europe and new leading powers. Towards partnership in strategic policy areas. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 87–99

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manning R (2006) Will ‘emerging donors’ change the face of international co-operation? Dev Policy Rev 24(4):371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafey A (2005) IBSA Forum: the rise of a ‘new’ non-alignment. India Quarterly 61(1):1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel-Vinay K (2013) The G20: a new geopolitical order. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS (2008) Trinity of the South. Potential of the India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) partnership. Academic Foundation, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands D (2008) Emerging donors in international development assistance: a synthesis report. International Development Research Centre (IDRC). http://publicwebsite.idrc.ca/EN/Documents/ donors-international-development-synthesis-report.pdf. Accessed 06 Sept 2011

  • Schneckener U (2009) The opportunities and limits of global governance by clubs. SWP Comments 2009/C22, Sept 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt G (1977) The external role of the European community. Saxon House, Farnborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Soederberg S (2006) Global governance in question: empire, class, and the new common sense in managing North–South relations. Pluto Press, London/Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Soko M (2007) Neues Gewicht im globalen Spiel? Afrika Süd 1(2007):30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm A (2004) Schwellen- und Ankerländer als Akteure einer globalen Partnerschaft – Überlegungen zu einer Positionsbestimmung aus deutscher entwicklungspolitischer Sicht. http://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/1-2004.pdf

  • Stuenkel O (2015) India-Brazil-South Africa dialogue forum (IBSA). The rise of the global south. Routledge, Abingdon/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel O, Jacob JT (2010) Rising powers and the future of democracy promotion: the case of Brazil and India. Port J Int Aff 2(4):23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokatlian J (ed) (2007) India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. El impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales. Libros del Zorzal, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1974) Declaration on the establishment of a new international economic order, A/RES/S-6/3201. http://www.un-documents.net/s6r3201.htm. Accessed 06 Sept 2011

  • Villares F (ed) (2006) India, Brazil and South Africa. Perspectives and alliances. Editora UNESP, Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Purushothaman R (2003) Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050. Goldman Sachs Global economics paper no 99. http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/global-growth/99-dreaming.pdf. Zugriff am 22 Jan 2008

  • Zakaria F (2008) The post-American world. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Husar, J. (2016). Introduction. In: Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28715-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics