Using ESM to Study Flow in a STEM Project

Chapter

Abstract

For decades, school students in the West have shown lower levels of interest in STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and math) than in humanities, arts, finance or the media. But STEM competencies are increasingly in demand in modern societies. A Danish project, Future Learning Lab (FUF), conducted by two Danish ministries in concert with the Katafonden foundation and the Nynaturfag.dk project, aims to find ways to close this STEM gap. The goal is to create both (1) increased student motivation for STEM subjects and (2) better STEM teaching and learning. Recently a number of classes of Danish school students tested a new FUF learning lab designed to meet these goals. Researchers measured student flow during the test period, using ESM (Experience Sampling Method) in combination with observations and interviews. The research found high levels of student flow during the test period, and pointed to the following FUF characteristics as likely causes of the high flow levels detected in the experiment: (1) increased scope for hands-on activities, (2) increased use of open-ended experiments, (3) increased scope for working in groups, (4) increased scope for open internet search, and (5) increased scope for wild “myth buster” STEM activities engendering a (feeling of) lack of control.

Keywords

ESM STEM subjects STEM teaching STEM learning STEM motivation STEM labs Flow Learning-by-doing Open-ended experiments 

References

  1. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow—the psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good business—leadership, flow and the making of meaning. New York: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  3. Egelund, N. (2010). PISA 2009 undersøgelsen—en sammenfatning [PISA 2009—an abbreviation]. Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  4. Egelund, N. (2013). PISA 2012 undersøgelsen—en sammenfatning. [PISA 2012—an abbreviation]. Copenhagen: KORA. Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning.Google Scholar
  5. Engeser, S. (Ed.). (2012). Advances in flow research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). Motivation, Flow-Erleben und Lernleistung in universitären Lernsettings. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(3), 259–172.Google Scholar
  7. Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
  8. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method—measuring the quality of everyday life. New York: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kormi-Nouri, R., Nilsson, L.-G., & Ohta, N. (2005). The novelty effect: Support for the novelty-encoding hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 133–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Merit, S., & Nielsen, T. (2006). Vinderkoncepter. [Winner concepts]. Copenhagen: Børsens Forlag.Google Scholar
  11. Rheinberg, F. (2004). Motivationsdiagnostik. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  12. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Engeser, S. (2003). Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens. In Stiensmeier-Pelster & Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 261–279). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  13. Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-garden; Norwegian youth’s orientations towards science – seen as signs of late modern identities. Doctoral thesis, University of Oslo, Faculty of Education, Olso.Google Scholar
  14. Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Acta Didactica, no. 4. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  15. Sølberg, J., & Troelsen, R. P. (2008). Et nuanceret billede af interesse for de naturvidenskabelige og teknologiske områder [A detailed picture of interest in scientific and technological fields]. In R.P. Troelsen, & J. Sølberg (Eds.), Den danske ROSE-undersøgelse—en antologi [The Danish Rose-survey—an anthology] (pp. 93–107). Aarhus University, Institut for Curriculumforskning, Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole.Google Scholar
  16. Thiel, P. (2014). Zero to one. Notes on startups, or how to build the future. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of AarhusAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations