Skip to main content

Facilitating Climate Change Adaptation on Smallholder Farms Through Farmers’ Collective Led On-Farm Adaptive Research: The SAF-BIN Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implementing Climate Change Adaptation in Cities and Communities

Abstract

In India, Bangladesh and Nepal 70 % of farms are less than 2 ha in size. These subsistence oriented, rain-fed farming systems are highly vulnerable to climate variability. Climate change challenges local food and nutritional security. Adaptation is the key to address these vulnerabilities. Agricultural research and extension systems in the region ignore traditional food systems and culturally accepted food baskets. The EU funded project “Strengthening Adaptive Farming in Bangladesh, India and Nepal (SAF-BIN)”, implemented by Caritas organisations, is building resilience to climate change through strengthening adaptive small scale farming systems in rain-fed areas. In a multi-sectoral collaboration a farmers’ collective-led approach has been implemented with smallholder farmers at the centre. A major tool has been on-farm adaptive research trials in which farmers’ collectives have developed and implemented on-farm trials in ten districts in Bangladesh, India and Nepal with the active involvement of civil society, researchers and government officials. Results are documentation and increased adoption of locally appropriate farming practises achieved through blending traditional and modern practices with awareness on organic, sustainable production. Farmers’ collectives successfully built resilience to climate change, increased yields, improved nutritional security, reduced external dependency, and reduced input costs. SAF-BIN is evolving as a successful model for strengthening adaptive capacities of smallholders. Lessons on integration of a diverse set of stakeholders are transferable and applicable to similar initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Public Distribution System in India and Public Food Distribution System in Nepal and Bangladesh.

  2. 2.

    Collection of floating debris (F.D.) (farmers practise); F.D. + fungicide (introduced farmers practise): yield 4.4 t/ha.

  3. 3.

    Dual fungicide application (“Folicur”) (farmers practice): yield 4.39 t/ha.

  4. 4.

    Chemicals + MOP + urea (introduced).

  5. 5.

    Lamit Ark contains chillies, ginger and garlic and acts as pest repellent.

  6. 6.

    Matka Khad contains cowdung, cow urine and jaggery and acts as nutrient supplement.

  7. 7.

    Combination of varieties and cultivation practises tested in on farm trials.

  8. 8.

    Vijay, Gautam

  9. 9.

    Gaura, Dhaulagiri, WK1204.

  10. 10.

    Communally managed seedbanks were established in all villages in Nepal and Bangladesh. In India 80 % of participating smallholders have access to communally or individually safely stored seed.

References

  • Bekele N, Obare G, Mithöfer D, Amudavi D (2013) The impact of group based training approaches on crop yield, household income and adoption of pest management practices in the smallholder horticultural subsector of Kenya. J Sust Dev Afr 15(1):117–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun A, Duveskog D (2008) The Farmer Field School approach—history, global assessment and success stories. IFAD Rural Poverty Report 2011. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • CDKN & ODI (2014) The IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report. What’s in it for South Asia? London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dmaps.com (2015a) Map of India. http://tinyurl.com/lhydd7e. Accessed 8 Mar 2015

  • Dmaps.com (2015b) Map of Madhya Pradesh. http://tinyurl.com/q2epcta. Accessed 8 Mar 2015

  • FAO (2009) Food security and agricultural mitigation in developing countries: options for capturing synergies. October. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam HR, Bhardwaj ML, Kumar R (2013) Climate change and its impact on plant diseases. Curr Sci 105:12

    Google Scholar 

  • Goma HC, Rahim K, Nangendo G, Riley J, Stein A (2001) Participatory studies for agro-ecosystem evaluation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 87:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug R (1999) Some leading issues in international agricultural extension, a literature review. J Agric Educ Ext 5:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell PB (2008) An assessment of the impact of agricultural research in South Asia since the Green Revolution. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2009) Climate Change Impacts – South Asia. In: The global mechanism. United Nations convention to combat desertification. International Fund for Agricultural Development. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2010) IFAD ’ s response to climate change through support to adaptation and related actions Comprehensive report: Final version. International Fund for Agricultural Development. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2011) Addressing climate change in Asia and the Pacific. International Fund for Agricultural Development. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD & UNEP (2013) Smallholders, food security and the environment. International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome, pp 1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • IRRI (2015) Sheath blight—IRRI Rice Knowledge Bank Training fact sheet. http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/training/fact-sheets/pest-management/diseases/item/sheath-blight. Accessed 20 Mar 2015

  • Jain SP, Polman W (2003) A handbook for trainers on participatory local development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi P, Gulati A, Cummings R (2007) Agricultural diversification in South Asia: beyond food security. In: Joshi P, Gulati A, Cummings R (eds) Agricultural diversification and smallholders in South Asia. Academic Foundation, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocmánková E, Trnka M, Juroch J, Dubrovský M, Semerádová D, Možný M, Žalud Z (2009) Impact of climate change on the occurrence and activity of harmful organisms. Plant Prot Sci 45:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot C, Axinn N, John KC, Chambers R, Singh RK, Garrity D … Salman A (1991) Training resource book for participatory experimental design. Report of a research design workshop on participatory design of on-farm experiments of the ICAR/IRRI collaborative Rice Research Project. Kumarganj, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapsopensource.com. (2015). Map of Bangladesh. http://tinyurl.com/mjfkt94. Accessed 8 Mar 2015

  • McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Pol 10:17–38. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MDF (2005) Problem tree analysis. MDF Training and Consulting. http://www.toolkitsportdevelopment.org/html/resources/91/910EE48E-350A-47FB-953B-374221B375CE/03 Problem tree analysis.pdf

  • Mruthyunjaya S, Ranjitha P (1998) The Indian agricultural research system: structure, current policy issues, and future orientation. World Dev 26(6):1089–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okry F, Van Mele P (2006) Documenting, validating and scaling-up local innovations. LEISA Mag 22(3):14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankaj VD (2015) SAF-BIN experiences from India. Presentation during the Conference on smallholders, New Delhi, 10–12 Mar 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrů M, Tielbörger K (2008) Germination behaviour of annual plants under changing climatic conditions: separating local and regional environmental effects. Oecologia 155:717–728. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0955-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius J, Dilts R, Bartlett A (eds) (2002) From farmer field school to community IPM: ten years of IPM training in Asia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • SAF-BIN (2013) Building resilience to climate change through strengthening adaptive small farming systems in Bangladesh, India and Nepal (SAF-BIN) project: narrative progress report May 2012–May 2013 (year 2). New Delhi/Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • SAF-BIN (2014) Building resilience to climate change through strengthening adaptive small farming systems in Bangladesh, India and Nepal (SAF-BIN) project: interim narrative report 01 June 2013–30 June 2014. New Delhi/Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontheimer S, Callens K, Seiffert B (1999) Conducting a PRA training and modifying PRA tools to your needs. An example from a participatory household food security and nutrition project in Ethiopia. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2006) Managing climate risk. Integrating adaptation into World Bank Group operations. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Traveltrendnepal.com (2015) Map of Nepal. http://tinyurl.com/lmbmw46. Accessed 8 Mar 2015

  • Van de Fliert E, Dung NT, Henriksen O, Dalsgaard JPT (2007) From collectives to collective decision-making and action: farmer field schools in Vietnam. J Agric Educ Ext 13(3):245–256. doi:10.1080/13892240701427706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington H, White H (2014) Farmer field schools from agricultural extension to adult education. 3ie Systematic Review Summary No. 1. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters-Bayer A, Kristjanson P, Wettasinha C, van Veldhuizen L, Quiroga G, Swaans K, Douthwaite B (2015) Exploring the impact of farmer-led research supported by civil society organisations. Agric Food Secur 4:1–7. doi:10.1186/s40066-015-0023-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

SAF-BIN is a joint effort of many stakeholders. Without the willingness of all participating smallholders to collaborate none of the project activities could have been implemented so the authors wish to express their deepest gratitude. The SAF-BIN team members of the implementing Caritas Organisations in Bangladesh, India and Nepal were tirelessly working in the field (Village Research Assistants, District Officers) to contributed to the data base on which this publication is built. Research Officers are acknowledged for their direct and indirect contributions to this publication. The associated partners of SAF-BIN (AFRPO, SHIATS, LI-BIRD) contributed by their expertise as advisers for research matters throughout the implementation of SAF-BIN. SACU facilitated the design and implementation of the project and provided necessary inputs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romana Roschinsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roschinsky, R. et al. (2016). Facilitating Climate Change Adaptation on Smallholder Farms Through Farmers’ Collective Led On-Farm Adaptive Research: The SAF-BIN Project. In: Leal Filho, W., Adamson, K., Dunk, R., Azeiteiro, U., Illingworth, S., Alves, F. (eds) Implementing Climate Change Adaptation in Cities and Communities. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28591-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics