Advertisement

Icacinaceae

Icacinaceae (Benth.) Miers, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. II, 8:174 (1851), nom. cons.
  • M. J. PotgieterEmail author
  • R. Duno
Chapter
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 14)

Abstract

Trees, shrubs or lianas, indumentum generally present. Large tubers rarely present. Leaves alternate, rarely opposite, simple, rarely lobed, exstipulate; petioles canaliculate; domatia present or absent, when present pits or pockets; blades coriaceous to sub-coriaceous, rarely membranaceous; margins entire or dentate, slightly revolute; penninerved, rarely palmatinerved. Inflorescences axillary, terminal or cauliflorous, generally cymose or racemose, with one to many bracts, rarely ebracteate; pedicels generally articulated with the flowers. Flowers hypogynous, commonly actinomorphic, rarely zygomorphic; bisexual or unisexual, at least functionally; flowers mostly pentamerous, but in Polycephalium and some Pyrenacantha 3-merous, in Polyporandra up to 7-merous; sepals (3–)5(6), mostly connate below to a varying degree and 4–6-lobed or -toothed, rarely free, imbricate or valvate, fleshy, generally glabrous; petals 4–6, free or united below to a varying degree, pubescent or glabrous, valvate, rarely subimbricate, generally reflexed; apex inflexed, rarely extended into an appendage; stamens 4–6, alternating with the petals; filaments filiform, fleshy, or sometimes broad and flattened; anthers 2(−4)-locular, dorsi- or basifixed, longitudinally dehiscent, introrse, less often latrorse or more or less extrorse; connective sometimes laterally expanded or extended into an appendage; staminodes sometimes present in pistillate flowers; disk present or absent, either annular or cup-like, free or adnate to the ovary, sometimes reduced to a unilateral fleshy scale; pistil pubescent or glabrous, 1(2–3)-locular, rarely pubescent inside, rudimentary in staminate flowers; ovules 2 per locule, pendant from near the apex, collateral or superposed, anatropous, apotropous, unitegmic; style simple, very rarely 2 or 3 stylodia (Casimirella); stigma capitate, punctiform, subcapitate or peltate, entire, 2–5-lobed or crenate or papillose. Fruit a drupe, ovoid, oblong, globose or rarely flattened and with fleshy appendage on one side; endocarp thin and crustaceous to thick and woody, sometimes spongious or fibrous, often veined or ribbed longitudinally. Seed 1, exarillate; embryo commonly minute; endosperm copious, usually non-ruminate.

Keywords

Staminate Flower Pistillate Flower Margin Entire Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Ovary Conical 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Aguwa, C.N., Okunji, C.O.1986. Gastrointestinal studies of Pyrenacantha staudtii leaf extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 15: 45–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akube, P.I., Mittal, G.C., Aguwe, C.N. 1983. Preliminary pharmacological study of some Nigerian medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 8: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161:105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baas, P. 1974. Stomatal types in Icacinaceae. Additional observations on genera outside Malesia. Acta Bot. Neerl. 23: 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, I.W., Howard, R.A. 1941a. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. I. Anatomy of the node and internode. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 125–131.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, I.W., Howard, R.A. 1941b. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. II. Vessels. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 171–187.Google Scholar
  8. Bailey, I.W., Howard, R.A. 1941c. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. III. Imperforate tracheary elements and xylem parenchyma. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 432–442.Google Scholar
  9. Bailey, I.W., Howard, R.A. 1941d. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. IV. Rays of the secondary xylem. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 556–568.Google Scholar
  10. Breytenbach, G.J., Skinner, J.D. 1982. Diet, feeding and habitat utilization by bushpigs Potamochoerus porcus L. S.A. J. Wildlife Res. 12:1–7.Google Scholar
  11. Carlquist, S. 1992. Wood anatomy of sympetalous dicotyledon families: A summary, with comments on systematic relationships and evolution of the woody habit. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesters, K.I.M. 1957. Some plant remains from the Upper Cretaceous and Tertiary of West Africa. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 8: 498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coates Palgrave, K. 1983. Trees of Southern Africa. 2nd impression. Cape Town: Struik.Google Scholar
  14. Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cunningham, A.B. 1985. The resource value of indigenous plants to rural people in a low agricultural area. Vol. 1. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  17. Dahl, A.O. 1952. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. 4. The pollen. J. Arnold Arbor. 33: 252–291.Google Scholar
  18. Dahlgren, R. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 80: 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dickison, W.C., Baas, P. 1977. The morphology and relationships of Paracryphia (Paracryphiaceae). Blumea 23: 417–438.Google Scholar
  20. Edelhoff, E. 1887. Vergleichende Anatomie des Blattes der Familie der Olacineen. Bot. Jahrb. 8: 100–153.Google Scholar
  21. Engler, A. 1872. Icacineae. In: Martius, C.F.P., Eichler, A.W., Urban, I. (eds.) Flora brasiliensis, vol. 12 (2). Leipzig: Frid. Fleischer, pp. 41–62, tab. 9–12.Google Scholar
  22. Engler, A. 1896. Icacinaceae. In: Nat. Pflanzenfam. ed. 1. Bd. 3/5: 233–257.Google Scholar
  23. Erdtman, G. (ed.) 1966. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
  24. Fagerlind, F. 1945. Bau des Gynoceums, der Samenlage, und des Embryosackes bei einigen Repräsentanten der Familie Icacinaceae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 39: 346–364.Google Scholar
  25. Fay, J.M. 1987. Icacina oliviformis (Icacinaceae): A close look at an under exploited crop. 1. Overview and ethnobotany. Econ. Bot. 41: 512–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fay, J.M. 1993. Icacina oliviformis (Icacinaceae): A close look at an underexploited food plant. 3. Ecology and production. Econ. Bot. 47(2): 163–170.Google Scholar
  27. Frost, P.G.H. 1980. Fruit-frugivore interactions in a South African coastal dune forest. In: Nohring, R. (ed.) Acta XVII Congr. lnt. Omithologici 2: 1179–1184. Berlin.Google Scholar
  28. Gershenzon, J., Mabry, T.J. 1983. Secondary metabolites and the higher classification of angiosperms. Nord. J. Bot. 3: 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregor, H.-J., Hagn, H. 1982. Fossil fructification from the Cretaceous-Palaeocene-boundary of SW-Egypt (Danian, BirAbu Munqar). Tertiary Res. 4: 121–147.Google Scholar
  30. Heintzelman, C.E., Howard, R.A. 1948. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. V. The pubescence and the crystals. Am. J. Bot. 35: 42–52.Google Scholar
  31. Hooker, J.D. 1867. Alsodeiopsis mannii. In: Hooker’s Icones Plantarum, vol. 11: t. 1008. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  32. Hua, P., Howard, R.A. 2008. Icacinaceae. In: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y. (eds.) Flora of China 11: 505–514. Beijing: Science Press and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jensen, S.R. 1992. Systematic implications of the distribution of iridoids and other chemical compounds in the Loganiaceae and other families of the Asteridae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79(2): 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johri, B.M., Ambegaokar, P.S., Srivastava, P.S. 1992. Comparative embryology of angiosperms. 2 vols. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaplan, M.A.C., Ribeiro, J., Gottlieb, O.R. 1991. Chemogeographical evolution of terpenoids in Icacinaceae. Phytochemistry 30: 2671–2676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kårehed, J. 2001. Multiple origin of the tropical forest tree family Icacinaceae. Am. J. Bot. 88: 2259–2274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Keller, R. 1992. Les familles de Dicotylédones ligneuses tropicales et leur identification à l’aide d’une clef fondée sur les seuls caractères végétatifs. Thèse Doct. Sc., Univ. du Languedoc, Montpellier.Google Scholar
  38. Lobreau-Callen, D. 1969. Les limites de l’ordre des Célastrales d’après le pollen. Pollen et Spores 11: 499–555.Google Scholar
  39. Lobreau-Callen, D. 1973. Le pollen de Icacinaceae: 2. Observations en microscopie électronique, Corrélations, Conclusions. Pollen et Spores 15: 47–89.Google Scholar
  40. Lobreau-Callen, D. 1975. Le pollen des Célastrales et groupes apparentés. Thèse Doct. Sc., Univ. du Languedoc, Montpellier.Google Scholar
  41. Lobreau-Callen, D., Srivastava, S.K. 1974. Paleocene occurrence of Platea (Icacinaceae) pollen in U.S.A. Pollen et Spores 16: 411–423.Google Scholar
  42. Mabogo, E. 1990. Ethnobotany of the VhaVenda. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  43. Manchester, S.R., Tiffney, B.H. 1993. Fossil fruits of Pyrenacantha and related Phytocreneae (Icacinaceae) in the Paleogene of North America, Europe and Africa. Am. J. Bot. (Abstracts) 80: 91.Google Scholar
  44. Mauritzon, J. 1936. Embryologische Angaben über Stackhousiaceae, Hippocrateaceae und Icacinaceae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 30: 541–550.Google Scholar
  45. Melchior, H., Werdermann, E. (eds.) 1964. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Ed. 12. Angiospermen. 2 vols. Berlin: Gebr. Bornträger.Google Scholar
  46. Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  47. Muller, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 47: 1–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagamasu, H., Kato., M. 2004. Nothapodytes amamianus (Icacinaceae), a new species from the Ryukyu Islands. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 55(2): 75–78.Google Scholar
  49. Napp-Zinn, K. 1973. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie. Berlin: Gebr. Bornträger.Google Scholar
  50. Nichols, G. 1991. Pancakes and fritters. Plant Life - Newsletter for amateur botanists and indigenous plant growers 4: 4.Google Scholar
  51. Palmer, E., Pitman, N. 1972. Trees of Southern Africa. 2 vols. Cape Town: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
  52. Pigg, K.B., Manchester, S.R., DeVore, M.L. 2008. Fruits of Icacinaceae (Tribe Iodeae) from the Late Paleocene of western North America. Am. J. Bot. 95: 824–833.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Potgieter, M.J. 1994. Contributions to the systematics of Southern African Icacinaceae. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  54. Potgieter, M.J., van Wyk, A.E. 1992. Intercellular pectic protuberances in plants: Their structure and taxonomic significance. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 33: 295–316.Google Scholar
  55. Potgieter, M.J., van Wyk, A.E. 1994a. Fruit structure of the Southern African species of Apodytes E. Mey. ex Arn. (Icacinaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 115: 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Potgieter, M.J., van Wyk, A.E. 1994b. Fruit structure of the genus Pyrenacantha Hook. (Icacinaceae) in Southern Africa. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 35: 105–113.Google Scholar
  57. Potgieter, M.J., van Wyk, A.E. 1994c. Fruit structure of the genus Cassinopsis Sond. (Icacinaceae) in Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 60: 122–126.Google Scholar
  58. Potgieter, M.J., van Wyk, A.E. 1994d. Bark structure of the Southern African Icacinaceae. IAWA J. 15: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Potgieter, M.J., van Wyk, A.E. 1999. Leaf anatomy of the Southern African Icacinaceae and its taxonomic significance. S. Afr. J. Bot. 65: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pretorius, S.J., Joubert, P.H., Scott, A.H., Fourie, T.G. 1991. The mollucicidal properties of Apodytes dimidiata subsp. dimidiata (Icacinaceae). J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 94: 159–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Rankin, B.D., Stockey, R.A., Beard, G. 2008. Fruits of Icacinaceae from the Eocene Appian Way locality of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169: 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rasoanaivo, P., Ratsimamango-Urverg, S., Messana, I., De Vincente, Y., Galeffi, C. 1990. Cassinopin, a kaempferol trirhamnoside from Cassinopsis madagascariensis. Phytochemistry 29: 2040–2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Savolainen, V., Manen, J.-F., Douzery, E., Spichiger, R. 1994. Molecular phylogeny of the Celastrales related families based on rbcL 5’flanking sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3: 27–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Hoot, S.B., Morton, C.M., Soltis, D.E., Bayer, C., Fay, M.F., de Bruijn, A.Y., Sullivan, S., Qiu, Y.-L. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Savolainen, V. et al. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull. 55: 257–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scott, R.A., Barghoorn, E.S. 1957. Phytocrene microcarpa - a new species of Icacinaceae based on cretaceous fruits from Kreischerville, New York. The Palaeobotanist 6: 25–28.Google Scholar
  67. Sharma, M.V., Uma Shaanker, R.U., Leather, S.R., Vasudeva, R., Shivanna, K.R. 2010. Floral resources, pollinators and fruiting in a threatened tropical deciduous tree. J. Plant Ecol. 4: 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sleumer, H. 1942. Icacinaceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Nat. Pflanzenfam., 2nd ed., 20b: 322–396.Google Scholar
  69. Sleumer, H. 1969. Materials towards the knowledge of the Icacinaceae of Asia, Malesia, and adjacent areas. Blumea 17: 181–264.Google Scholar
  70. Sleumer, H. 1971. Icacinaceae. In: Van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.) Flora Males. I, 7(1): 1–87. Leyden: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  71. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.A., Chase, M.W., Mort, M.E., Albach, D.C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W.H., Hoot, S.B., Fay, M.F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S.M., Prince, L.M., Kress, W.J., Nixon, K.C., Farris, J.S. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Soltis, D.E., Smith, S.A., Cellinese, N., Wurdack, K.J., Tank, D.C., Brockington, S.F., Refulio-Rodriguez, N.F., Walker, J.B., Moore, M.J., Carlsward, B.S., Bell, C.D., Latvis, M., Crawley, S., Black, C., Diouf, D., Xi, Z., Rushworth, C.A., Gitzendanner, M.A., Sytsma, K.J., Qiu, Y.L., Hilu, K.W., Davis, C.C., Sanderson, M.J., Beaman, R.S., Olmstead, R.G., Judd, W.S., Donoghue, M.J., Soltis, P.S. 2011. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. Am. J. Bot. 98: 704–730.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Soudry, D., Gregor, H.-J. 1997. Jodes israelii sp. nov.: a huge phosphate-mineralized icacinacean fructification from the late Cretaceous of the Negev, southern Israel. Cretaceous Res. 18: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stull, G.W., Moore, R.W., Manchester, S.R. 2011. Fruits of Icacinaceae from the Eocene of southeastern North America and their biogeographic implications. Int. J. Plant Sci. 172: 935–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Takhtajan, A.L. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46: 225–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tanai, T. 1990. Euphorbiaceae and Icacinaceae from the Paleogene of Hokkaido, Japan. Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus., Ser. C, 16: 91–118.Google Scholar
  77. Thayn, G.F., Tidwell, W.D., Stokes, W.L. 1985. Flora of the Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain formation of Utah and Colorado. Part III: Icacinoxylon pittiense n. sp. Am. J. Bot. 77: 175–180.Google Scholar
  78. Thorne, R.F. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Bot. Rev. 58: 225–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Utteridge, T., Nagamasu, H., Teo, S.P., White, L.C., Gasson, P. 2005. Sleumeria (Icacinaceae): A new genus from northern Borneo. Syst. Bot. 30: 635–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van Staveren, M.G.C., Baas, P. 1973. Epidermal leaf characters of the Malesian Icacinaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 22: 329–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vera Caletti, P. 1999. Revisión del Género Calatola (Icacinaceae) en México. Tésis de Maestro, Instituto de Enseñanza e Investigación en Ciencias Agricolas, Texcoco, México. 107 pp.Google Scholar
  82. Villiers, J.-F. 1973. Icacinaceae. In: Aubréville, A., Leroy, J.-F. (eds.) Flora du Cameroun. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat. 15: 3–100.Google Scholar
  83. Watt, J.M., Breyer-Brandwijk, M.G. 1962. The medicinal and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiodiversityUniversity of LimpopoPolokwaneSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centro de Investigación Científica de YucatánMeridaMexico

Personalised recommendations