Anormative Social Regulation: The Attempt to Cope with Social Morphogenesis
The ‘problem of normativity’ concerns the role that society’s value system, norms and conventions play in legislative regulation. Rapid social change was always problematic, for example the swift displacement of French Revolutionary law by the Napoleonic Code. What validated one or the other, since both broke with previous social norms? Traditionally, both legal and social theories had appealed to shared normativity to account for the ‘bindingness’, the sense of obligation held to inhere in the law. However, the intensification of morphogenesis had growing negative repercussions on all the normative components of the legal order: law itself, norms and rules, conventions, custom and etiquette. It is argued that as these elements weaken, ‘Anormative Regulation’ (or ‘Bureaucratic Regulation’) takes over in contemporary society, entailing no ‘ought’, exerting a causal force not a moral one, and operating through penalizations and prohibitions, which are punitive without entailing either a criminal record or invoking social sanction.
KeywordsNorms Values ‘Bindingness’ Anormativity ‘Moral disconnect’
- Abrutyn, S., & Carter, M. J. (2014). The decline in shared collective conscience as found in the shifting norms and values of Etiquette manuals. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43,2.Google Scholar
- Archer, M. S. (Ed.). (1972). Students, university and society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Archer, M.S. (2014b). Being trafficked to work. http://www.casinapioiv.va/content/accademia/en/publications/extraseries/sustainable.htm
- Archer, M. S. (2015). How agency is transformed in the course of social transformation. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), The generative mechanisms transforming late modernity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R. (2005). Is better regulation smarter regulation?. Public Law, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Better Regulation Taskforce. (undated). Principles of better regulation (p. 1).Google Scholar
- Black, J. (2007). Tensions in the regulatory state. Public Law, 58–73.Google Scholar
- Bobbio, N. (1996). Right and left. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Cabinet Office Paper (2013). www.gov.uk/government/publications/when laws become too complex (downloaded 21.11.2014).
- Casini, L. (2007). Models of public administration. Comparative analysis of administrative organisation. In Formez, Innovazione amministrativa e crescita. Rapporto con raccomandazioni (Ricerca Giannini-Formez II Fase, Volume VIII). Rome, Formez: International Comparisons.Google Scholar
- Donati, P. (2000). La cittadinanza societaria. Laterza: Roma-Bari.Google Scholar
- Donati, P. (2014). Morphogenic society and the structure of social relations. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Late modernity: Trajectories towards morphgenic society. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professionals and their organization: Teachers, nurses and social workers. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Ginsberg, M. (1962). The diversity of morals. London: Mercury Books.Google Scholar
- Gouldner, A. (1971). The coming crisis of western sociology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- GOV-UK. (2013). When laws become too complex. Cabinet Office and Office of the Parliamentary Counsel, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/publications/when-laws-become-too-complex (downloaded 21.11.2014).
- Hall, C., Scott, C., & Hood, C. (1999). Telecommunications regulation: Culture, chaos and interdependency inside the regulatory process. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- House of Lords. (2011). House of Lords, Library note, LLN 2011/028.Google Scholar
- Joyce, R. (2007). The evolution of morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kelsen, H. (1945). General theory of law and state. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
- Moran, M. (2004). The British regulatory state: High modernism and hyper-innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nader, L., & Nader, C. (1985). A wide angle on regulation: An anthropological perspective’. In R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory policy and the social sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- OECD. (1995). Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Improving the Quality of Government Regulation, OECD/GD(95)95, Note 1.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Social Streets – Italy see www.socialstreet.it.
- Teubner, G. (1993). Law as an autopoietic system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Turner, S. P. (2010). Explaining the normative. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- von Pufendorf, S. (1964) . On the law of nature and nations. London: Wiley.Google Scholar