Collective Practices and Norms

  • Tony LawsonEmail author
Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)


Social positioning applies not just to people, artefacts and communities but also to practices. This is a proposition I investigate in the current paper. I do so in the context of examining how relative stability is often maintained even in the midst of intense social morphogenesis.


Social positioning Collective practices Social change and stability Norms PVRS Model Darwinian process of evolution Modern economics 



For helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper I am grateful to Nuno Martins, Margaret Archer and to other members of the Workshop on Social Morphogenesis.


  1. Archer, M. S. (2010). Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory, 28(3), 272–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (2015). How agency is transformed in the course of social transformation: Don’t forget the double morphogenesis, chapter 7. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Generative mechanisms transforming the social order (pp. 135–157). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M. S. (2016). Morphogenesis and anormative social regulation. In M. Archer (Ed.), Morphogenesis and the crisis of normativity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Arena, R. (2000). Jean-Baptiste Say and the French liberal school of the nineteenth century: Outside the canon? In S. Peart (Ed.), Reflections on the classical canon: Essays in honour of Samuel Hollander. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Coats, A. W. B. (1992). On the history of economic thought: British and American economic essays, volume I. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dawkins, R. (1978). Replicator selection and the extended phenotype. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 47, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Debreu, G. (1959). The theory of value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Debreu, G. (1991). The mathematization of economic theory. American Economic Review, 81(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin, C. D. (1998). The patrons of economics in a time of transformation. In S. Morgan Mary & M. Rutherford (Eds.), From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism. Annual supplement to volume 30, history of political economy. Duke: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hahn, F. H. (1970, January). Some adjustment problems. Econometrica, 38. Reprinted as pp. 1–17 in Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Hahn, F. H. (1982). Money and inflation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Hull, D., et al. (1981). Units of evolution: A metaphysical essay. In U. J. Jensen & R. Harré (Eds.), The philosophy of evolution (pp. 23–44). Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ingrao, B., & Israel, G. (1990). The invisible hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, L. V., Gardner, L., Porter, E., & Coggeshall (Eds.). (1982). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: Social and behavioral sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawson, T. (2003). Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Lawson, T. (2012a). Ontology and the study of social reality: Emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(2), 345–385. Reprinted in Stephen Pratten (ed.) (2015). Social Ontology and Modern Economics. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 413–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawson, T. (2012b). Mathematical modelling and ideology in the economics academy: Competing explanations of the failings of the modern discipline? Economic Thought: History, Philosophy Methodology, An open access journal of the World Economic Association, 1(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  20. Lawson, T. (2013a). Emergence, morphogenesis, causal reduction and downward causation. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (pp. 61–84). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawson, T. (2013b). What is this ‘School’ called neoclassical economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(5), 947–983. Reprinted in Lutfi Sunar (ed) (2014) New Trends and Perspectives in Social Sciences, published in Turkish by Nobel Publishing in their Sociology and Social Theory series. Also reprinted in Tony Lawson (2015f); and in Jamie Morgan (ed.) (2016).Google Scholar
  22. Lawson, T. (2014). A speeding up of the rate of social change? Power, technology, resistance, globalisation and the good society. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Late modernity: Trajectories towards the morphogenetic society. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Lawson, T. (2015a). The nature of the firm, and peculiarities of the corporation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawson, T. (2015b). The modern corporation: The site of a mechanism of global social change, forthcoming. In M. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis: Generative mechanisms transforming the social order. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Lawson, T. (2015c). A conception of social ontology. In S. Pratten (Ed.), Social ontology and modern economics (pp. 19–52). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Lawson, T. (2015d). What is an institution? In S. Pratten (Ed.), Social ontology and modern economics (pp. 553–557). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lawson, T. (2015e). Critical ethical naturalism: An orientation to ethics. In S. Pratten (Ed.), Social ontology and modern economics (pp. 359–387). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Lawson, T. (Ed.). (2015f). The nature and state of modern economics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Lazega, E. (2014). “Morphogenesis unbound” from the dynamics of multilevel networks: A non-structural perspective, chapter 8. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Late modernity: Trajectories towards Morphogenetic Society (pp. 173–192). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maccarini, A. (2015). Turbulence and relational conjectures: The emergence of morphogenetic environments, chapter 8. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Generative mechanisms transforming the social order (pp. 159–181). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Maccarini, A. (2016). A tale of two wars: Universality and the normative tensions of the morphogenetic society. In M. Archer (Ed.), Morphogenesis and the crisis of normativity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Martins, N. (2014). The Cambridge revival of political economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, S. (2001). Social action: A teleological account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morgan, J. (Ed.). (2016). What is neoclassical economics? Debating the origins, meaning and significance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Porpora, D. (2015). Why don’t things change? The matter of morphostasis, chapter 9. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Generative mechanisms transforming the social order (pp. 185–203). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Porpora, D. (2016). The great normative changes of the twentieth century. In M. Archer (Ed.), Morphogenesis and normativity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Reinert, E. S. (2000). The Austrians and the other canon. In J. Backhaus (Ed.), The history of evolutionary economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  38. Searle, J. R. (2010) Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Weiner, J. (1994). The beak of the finch: A story of evolution in our time. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  40. Wight, C. (2016). Emergence, development and death: Norms in International Society, chapter 4. In: Archer (Ed.), Morphogenesis and the crisis in normativity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Willmott, H. C. (1986). Unconscious sources of motivation in the theory of the subject; an exploration and critique of Giddens’ dualistic models of action and personality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 16(1), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yonay, Y. P. (1998). The struggle over the soul of economics: Institutionalist and neoclassical economists in America between the wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations