Skip to main content

A Study on Performance Metrics to Identify Solutions of Interest from a Trade-Off Set

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9592))

Abstract

Optimization algorithms typically deliver a set of trade-off solutions for problems involving multi/many-objectives in conflict.The number of such solutions could be in hundreds, thousands or even more. A decision maker typically identifies a handful of preferred trade-off solutions (solutions of interest (SOI)) from the above set based on secondary indicators e.g. expected marginal utility, convex bulge, hypervolume contribution, bend angle, reflex angle etc. In this paper, we first highlight that members of SOI could be significantly different depending on the choice of the secondary indicator. This leads to an important question “what metrics should a decision maker use to choose a solution over another ?” and more importantly “how to identify a handful of solutions ?” from a potentially large set of solutions. In this paper we introduce an approach based on local curvature to select such solutions of interest. The performance of the approach is illustrated using a bi-objective test problem, and two many-objective engineering optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Asafuddoula, M., Ray, T., Sarker, R.: A decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm for many objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(3), 445–460 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bechikh, S., Said, L.B., Ghédira, K.: Searching for knee regions of the pareto front using mobile reference points. Soft Comput. 15(9), 1807–1823 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Branke, J., Deb, K., Dierolf, H., Osswald, M.: Finding knees in multi-objective optimization. In: Yao, X., Burke, E.K., Lozano, J.A., Smith, J., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Bullinaria, J.A., Rowe, J.E., Tiňo, P., Kabán, A., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 722–731. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Das, I., Dennis, J.E.: Normal-bounday intersection: a new method for generating pareto optimal points in multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 8(3), 631–657 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Das, I.: On characterizing the knee of the pareto curve based on normal-boundary intersection. Struct. Optim. 18(2–3), 107–115 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K., Gupta, S.: Understanding knee points in bicriteria problems and their implications as preferred solution principles. Eng. Optim. 43(11), 1175–1204 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Rachmawati, L., Srinivasan, D.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with controllable focus on the knees of the pareto front. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(4), 810–824 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ray, T., Tai, K., Seow, K.C.: An evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Eng. Optim. 33(3), 399–424 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schütze, O., Laumanns, M., Coello, C.A.C.: Approximating the knee of an MOP with stochastic search algorithms. In: Rudolph, G., Jansen, T., Lucas, S., Poloni, C., Beume, N. (eds.) PPSN 2008. LNCS, vol. 5199, pp. 795–804. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Simpson, T.W., Chen, W., Allen, J.K., Mistree, F.: Conceptual design of a family of products through the use of the robust concept exploration method. AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. Multi. Anal. Optim. 2, 1535–1545 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, R., Zhang, Q., Zhang, T.: Pareto adaptive scalarising functions for decomposition based algorithms. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Henggeler Antunes, C., Coello, C.C. (eds.) EMO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9018, pp. 248–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, X., Tian, Y., Jin, Y.: A knee point driven evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. PP(99), 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Bleuler, S.: A tutorial on evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Gandibleux, X., Sevaux, M., Sörensen, K., T’kindt, V. (eds.) Metaheuristics for Multiobjective Optimisation. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 535, pp. 3–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalyan Shankar Bhattacharjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bhattacharjee, K.S., Singh, H.K., Ray, T. (2016). A Study on Performance Metrics to Identify Solutions of Interest from a Trade-Off Set. In: Ray, T., Sarker, R., Li, X. (eds) Artificial Life and Computational Intelligence. ACALCI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9592. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28270-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28270-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28269-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28270-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics