Advertisement

Strategic Self-presentation in the Sharing Economy: Implications for Host Branding

  • Iis P. TussyadiahEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

Peer-to-peer accommodation platform is a unique venue of commercial social exchanges where mixed-mode interactions (i.e., online first, then offline) occur between hosts and guests. With the continuous growth of sharing economy comes the importance to better understand the strategies that hosts use to communicate with and attract their prospective consumers. Using the framework of personal branding and self-presentation, this study explored the different ways hosts of peer-to-peer accommodation articulate their profile online. Using host descriptions from 12,785 Airbnb listings in New York, United States, five clusters of host self-presentation were identified: The Global Citizen, The Local Expert, The Personable, The Established, and The Creative. Honest and positive self-presentation, as well as competence strategies were identified from these clusters. The host profiles were further explored to identify differences in their behaviour, listing characteristics, and guest review ratings.

Keywords

Sharing economy Personal branding Host branding Self-presentation Airbnb 

References

  1. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belotti, V., Ambard, A., Turner, D., Gossmann, C., Demkova, K., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). A muddle of models of motivation for using peer-to-peer economy systems. In Proceedings of CHI 2015 conference, Crossings, South Korea.Google Scholar
  3. Bortree, D. S. (2005). Presentation of self on the web: An ethnographic study of teenage girls’ weblogs. Education, Communication & Information, 5(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, C.-P. (2013). Exploring personal branding on YouTube. Journal of Internet Commerce, 12(4), 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dominick, J. R. (1999). Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-presentation on the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(4), 646–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation process in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software - Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2013). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Working paper. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2271971
  12. Higuchi, K. (2015). KH Coder 2.x reference manual. Retrieved from http://khc.sourceforge.net/en/manual_en_v2.pdf
  13. Inside Airbnb. (2015). Get the data. Retrieved from http://insideairbnb.com/get-the-data.html
  14. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(6), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, J., & Tussyadiah, I. P. (2013). Social networking and social support in tourism experience: The moderating role of online self-presentation strategies. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1–2), 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, J., Yoon, Y., & Zo, H. (2015). Why people participate in the sharing economy: A social exchange perspective. In PACIS 2015 proceedings (Paper 76). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015/76
  18. Labrecque, L. I., Markos, E. C., & Milne, G. R. (2011). Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. doi: 10.1002/cb.1512 (OnlineFirst).Google Scholar
  20. Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2005). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0512106v1.pdf
  21. Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Sanderson, J. (2008). The blog is serving its purpose: Self-presentation strategies on 38pitches.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 912–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwabel, D. (2009). Me 2.0: A powerful way to achieve brand success. New York: Kaplan Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Shepherd, I. D. H. (2005). From Cattle and Coke to Charlie: Meeting the challenge of self marketing and personal branding. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toma, C., Hancock, J., & Ellison, N. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003 (pp. 252–259). Retrieved from http://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/tagging.pdf
  27. Trammel, K. D., & Keshelashvili, A. (2005). Examining the new influences: A self-presentation study of A-list blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 968–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tussyadiah, I. P. (2015). An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel. In I. Tussyadiah & A. Inversini (Eds.), Information & communication technologies in tourism 2015 (pp. 819–832). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Tussyadiah, I. P., & Pesonen, J. (2015). Impacts of peer-to-peer accommodation use on travel pattern. Journal of Travel Research. doi: 10.1177/0047287515608505.Google Scholar
  30. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interactions: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyper personal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. (2015). A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Working paper. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2554500

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Hospitality Business ManagementWashington State UniversityVancouverUSA

Personalised recommendations