Advertisement

Innovation-Related Organizational Decision-Making: The Case of Responsive Web Design

  • Chris GibbsEmail author
  • Ulrike Gretzel
  • Zahra Noorani
Conference paper

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a growing body of research on the adoption of responsive website design, by studying the related organizational decision making process. Using the Technological, Organizational and Environmental factors (TOE) framework as a theoretical foundation, this exploratory research used semi-structured interviews with US state level destination marketing organizations (DMOs). The findings demonstrate that DMO websites are multifaceted ecosystems and that innovation-related organizational decision-making is too complex but also too accidental to neatly fit within the TOE framework. The findings further question established notions of technology adoption and call for more critical and qualitative research to obtain insights into organizational technology adoption processes.

Keywords

Web design Technological Organizational Environment (TOE) Responsive web design Technology adoption Destination marketing organization 

References

  1. Alshamaila, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Li, F. (2013). Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: A multi-perspective framework. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(3), 250–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeles, S. (2015). Google gives mobile-friendly sites a boost in search ranking. Business News Daily. Retrieved from http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/7808-google-search-ranking-mobile.html.
  3. Baker, J. (2012). The technology–organization–environment framework. Information systems theory (pp. 231–245). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Dedrick, J., & West, J. (2003, December). Why firms adopt open source platforms: A grounded theory of innovation and standards adoption. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems (pp. 236–257). Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  5. Designmodo. (2014, February 10). The pros and cons of responsive web design vs. mobile website vs. native app [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://designmodo.com/responsive-design-vs-mobile-website-vs-app/
  6. Frain, B. (2012). Responsive web design with HTML5 and CSS3. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Gibbs, C., & Adams, C. (2015). DMO mobile readiness. Toronto: Ted Rogers Institute for Hospitality and Tourism Research.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbs, C., & Gretzel, U. (2015). Drivers of responsive website design innovation by destination marketing organizations information and communication technologies in tourism 2015 (pp. 581–592). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Google. (2014). The 2014 traveler’s road to decision.Google Scholar
  10. Gretzel, U. (2011). Intelligent systems in tourism: A social science perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 757–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuan, K., & Chau, P. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information & Management, 38(8), 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design (Vol. 9). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  13. Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of destination marketing organisations’ websites: Evidence from China. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12(5), 536–549.Google Scholar
  14. Marcotte, E. (2011). Responsive web design: Editions Eyrolles.Google Scholar
  15. Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. (2008). A comparison of web site adoption in small and large Portuguese firms. Paper presented at the ICE-BGoogle Scholar
  16. Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. (2009). Determinants of information technology adoption in Portugal. Paper presented at the International Conference on e-BusinessGoogle Scholar
  17. Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.Google Scholar
  18. Orlikowski, W. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17, 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palvia, P., Mao, E., Salam, A., & Soliman, K. (2003). Management information systems research: what's there in a methodology? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 16.Google Scholar
  20. Park, Y., & Gretzel, U. (2007). Success factors for destination marketing web sites: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pike, S., & Page, S. (2014). Destination Marketing Organizations and destination marketing: A narrative analysis of the literature. Tourism Management, 41, 202–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Romanazzi, S., Petruzzellis, L., & Iannuzzi, E. (2011). Click & experience. Just virtually there. The effect of a destination website on tourist choice: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 20(7), 791–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stepchenkova, S., Tang, L., Jang, S. S., Kirilenko, A. P., & Morrison, A. M. (2010). Benchmarking CVB website performance: Spatial and structural patterns. Tourism Management, 31(5), 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tanrisevdi, A., & Duran, N. (2011). Comparative evaluation of the official destination websites from the perspective of customers. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 20(7), 740–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tornatzky, L., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. (2006). Identifying the success factors of web-based marketing strategy: An investigation of convention and visitors bureaus in the United States. Journal of Travel Research, 44(3), 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, D., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D. (2014). Adapting to the mobile world: A model of smartphone use. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiang, Z., Pan, B., Law, R., & Fesenmaier, D. (2010). Assessing the visibility of destination marketing organizations in Google: A case study of convention and visitor bureau websites in the United States. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(7), 694–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yuan, Y. L., Gretzel, U., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2003). Internet technology use by American convention and visitors bureaus. Journal of Travel Research, 41(3), 240–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zach, F., Gretzel, U., & Xiang, Z. (2010). Innovation in the web marketing programs of American convention and visitor bureaus. Information Technology & Tourism, 12(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zach, F., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D. (2007). An assessment of innovation in web marketing: Investigating American convention and visitors bureaus. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 2007, 365–376.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ted Rogers School of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of Queensland Business SchoolSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations