Advertisement

How Far, How Near Psychological Distance Matters in Online Travel Reviews: A Test of Construal-Level Theory

  • Seunghun Shin
  • Namho Chung
  • Doyong KangEmail author
  • Chulmo KooEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

An online travel review is regarded as more important than a general product review due to the tourism product’s intangibleness. This study’s objective is to explore the effect of online travel reviews’ usefulness to the tourist’s perception using the construal-level theory (CLT). For this goal, online travel reviews are divided based on the review content characteristics, and the review usefulness of two different online reviews is compared using the temporal distance. The results show that the near future tourists are more influenced by concrete reviews than abstract reviews; however, the far future tourists are more influenced by abstract reviews than concrete reviews. Based on the results, the theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and future research directions follow based on the limitations.

Keywords

Online travel review Review usefulness Construal-level theory Temporal distance Concrete review Abstract review 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2043345).

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30, 805–825.Google Scholar
  4. Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buhalis, D., & Licata, M. C. (2002). The future eTourism intermediaries. Tourism Management, 23(3), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gretzel, U., & Yoo, K. H. (2008). Use and impact of online travel reviews. Information and communication technologies in tourism, 2008, 35–46.Google Scholar
  10. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Research note-investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kellermann, K., & Reynolds, R. (1990). When ignorance is bliss the role of motivation to reduce uncertainty in uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 17(1), 5–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, M., Chung, N., Lee, C., & Kim, J. (2012). Do loyalty groups differ in the role of trust in online tourism shopping? A process perspective. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 29(4), 352–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, K. Y., & Kim, S. W. (2012). The impact of online reviews in purchasing decision making -controlling effects of Positive/Negative reviews. Customer Satisfaction Management Research, 14(3), 85–102.Google Scholar
  16. Li, M., Huang, L., Tan, C., & Wei, K. (2011). Assessing the helpfulness of online product review: A progressive experimental approach. In P. Seddon & S. Gregor (Eds.), Pacis (p. 111). Australia: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  17. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mauri, A. G., & Minazzi, R. (2013). Web reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential customers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore, D. J., & Harris, W. D. (1996). Affect intensity and the consumer’s attitude toward high impact emotional advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising, 25(2), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.Google Scholar
  23. Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. T. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prothero, J., & Beach, L. R. (1984). Retirement decisions: Expectation, intention, and action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14(2), 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tussyadiah, I. P., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2009). Mediating tourist experiences: Access to places via shared videos. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vermeulen, I. E., & Seegers, D. (2009). Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management, 30(1), 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walmsley, D., & Jenkins, J. M. (1992). Tourism cognitive mapping of unfamiliar environments. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(2), 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, Y., Yu, Q., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2002). Defining the virtual tourist community: Implications for tourism marketing. Tourism Management, 23(4), 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (2014). Memory and cognition in its social context. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  33. Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ye, Q., Law, R., & Gu, B. (2009). The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(1), 180–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Young, M. (1999). Cognitive maps of nature-based tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(4), 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School, Department of Convention & Exhibition ManagementKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Hotel Management, College of Hotel & Tourism ManagementKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Package Tour & MICE DivisionRedcap TourSeoulRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Department of Convention Management, College of Hotel & Tourism ManagementKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations