Hotel Website Quality Versus Star Level: The Case of Macau Hotel Websites

  • Shanshan QiEmail author
Conference paper


How can Macau’s hotels keep pace with consumer expectations? This study incorporates fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) into a functionality assessment of Macau hotel websites. Research participants were asked to rate the importance of website functionality attributes, and rate the functionality of the websites in terms of how well they presented these attributes, by means of linguistic terms. An overall percentage score was then assigned to the hotels, allowing them to be ranked in order of website performance. Although hotels with the highest star ratings (5 star deluxe) received the highest average scores for their websites, the website performance of hotels ranging from budget accommodation to 5 star did not consistently reflect their star rating. The variations are attributed to such factors as a superfluity of information (wherein the most desired features are not sufficiently accessible), a lack of interactive features, and the hotel’s mismanagement of online feedback, including an unawareness of perceptions posted on independent, user-review sites. The research findings represent a preliminary attempt to assess the interactivity of Macau hotel websites in light of consumer preferences and a web 2.0 design format.


Macau Hotel website Functionality Website content 



Funding for this study was provided by a grand (082/2014/A) from The Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau.


  1. Bellman, B. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chung, T., & Law, R. (2003). Developing a performance indicator for hotel websites. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22(1), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corigliano, M. A., & Baggio, R. (2006). On the significance of tourism website evaluations. In M. Hitz, M. Sigala, & J. Murphy (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 320–331). Wien, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Feng, S., & Xu, L. (1999). An intelligent decision support system for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban development. Expert Systems with Applications, 16(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ha, Y., & Im, H. (2012). Role of web site design quality in satisfaction and word of mouth generation. Journal of Service Management, 23(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ho, C.-I., & Lee, Y.-L. (2007). The development of an e-travel service quality scale. Tour Manage, 28(6), 1434–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hsieh, Y.-C. (2012). Hotel companies’ environmental policies and practices: A content analysis of their web pages. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(1), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ip, C., Law, R., & Lee, H. A. (2012). The evaluation of hotel website functionality by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 29(3), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeong, M., & Lambert, C. U. (2001). Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers’ behavioral intentions to use lodging websites. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(1), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, W. G., & Kim, D. J. (2004). Factors affecting online hotel reservation intention between online and non-online customers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 23(4), 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Law, R., & Bai, B. (2008). How do the preferences of online buyers and browsers differ on the design and content of travel websites? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(4), 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Law, R., & Cheung, C. (2006). A study of the perceived importance of the overall website quality of different classes of hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25(3), 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Law, R., Ho, D., & Cheung, C. (2004). A study of the functionality of hotel websites in mainland China and the United States. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 3(1), 202–209.Google Scholar
  14. Law, R., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2006). Importance of hotel website dimensions and attributes: Perceptions of online browsers and online purchasers. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 30(3), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leung, D., Law, R., van Hoof, H., & Buhalis, D. (2013). Social media in tourism and hospitality: A literature review. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1/2), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang, K., & Law, R. (2003). A modified functionality performance evaluation model for evaluating the performance of China based hotel websites. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 2(2), 193–208.Google Scholar
  17. Macau Government Tourist Office (2014). (accessed on 13/07/2015)
  18. Schmidt, S., Cantallops, A. S., & Santos, C. P. (2008). The characteristics of hotel websites and their implications for website effectiveness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(4), 504–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Statistics and Census Service. (2015). Statistics of tourists arrivals.–6e5b–4452–8ad1–7768eafc99ed
  20. Tredinnick, L. (2006). Web 2.0 and business: A pointer to the intranets of the future? Business Information Review, 23(4), 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Whitla, P., Walters, P. G. P., & Davies, H. (2007). Global strategies in the international hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 204–213.Google Scholar
  22. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tourism CollegeInstitute for Tourism StudiesMacaoChina

Personalised recommendations