Skip to main content

IFRS and the Works Council in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
IFRS in a Global World

Abstract

This paper is about Financial Reporting for employees and their representatives. They have specific needs that do not meet those of shareholders. The need for employees to be given comprehensive information on the company’s situation is not taken into account by the prevalent reporting standards, i.e. IFRS.

In the first part of this paper, we show how IFRS are detrimental to the specific reporting’s needs of employees and works councils. In the second part, we present Jacques Richard's contribution to company’s financial analysis, to the benefit of all stakeholders.

Now that the IFRS have invaded the field of accounting and financial reporting, we should fall back on ad hoc forms of reporting, to meet the needs of employees and their representatives. We explore some of these ad hoc forms, only to conclude that they have limited scope and few support from the regulatory bodies.

This conclusion is not satisfactory per se. It comes down to the fact that the IFRS have prevailed, even though they clearly do not meet the needs of users. Moreover, there is no certainty that shareholders will take advantage from the instability created by these standards. The fact that since the last financial crisis, the value of many listed companies is now lower than that of their book value, even when inflated by “made in IFRS” pyrotechnics and updates, indicates a level of pretension that cannot withstand economic cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    CEGOS’s Survey realized in 2004 with 800 French employees, representative of a national sample, which covers three big categories of active persons: executives, intermediate occupations and workers.

  2. 2.

    For Charreaux and Desbrières, value added is the difference, on the whole value chain, between the opportunity price for the customer and the opportunity cost for the supplier. This value added is then distributed among the various stakeholders of the company.

  3. 3.

    Particularly in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the United States and its French equivalent, the Financial Security Act (loi de sécurisation financière) in 2003.

  4. 4.

    In this connection, we look back with some nostalgia at our comments in the 1980s when we referred to the “game of allocations to and reversals of provisions” when analysing net income; and the British colleague who told us that in France we always knew exactly how much should be allocated to provisions but never why it was necessary to create provisions.

  5. 5.

    New economic regulations.

  6. 6.

    For unlisted companies with fewer than 500 employees or a turnover of less than EUR 100 million, this obligation will not come into effect until financial year ending 31 December 2016.

  7. 7.

    Read also: Report on 9 years of enforcement of the NRE Law (New Economic Regulations) on company reporting. Alpha Group’s Centre Etudes & Prospective, April 2012.

References

  • Capron M (2005) Les normes comptables internationales, instruments du capitalisme financier. La découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Charreaux G (1989) Gestion financière. LITEC, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Charreaux G, Desbrières P (1998) Gouvernance des entreprises: valeur partenariale contre valeur actionnariale. Finance Contrôle Stratégie 1(2):57–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen E (1988) Analyse financière. Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • DARES (2009). La Participation, l’Intéressement et l’Épargne salariale en 2007. Premières Informations Synthèses, no. 31.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Evraert S, Riahi-Belkaoui A (1998) Usefulness of value added reporting: a review and synthesis of the literature. Manag Financ 24(11):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussy R, Craig RJ (1982) Keeping employees informed. Butterworths, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC (2001) Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Monitor Company. October

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard J (1993) Analyse financière et audit des performances. La Villeguérin Editions, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard J, Becom, Secafi (2000) L’analyse financière des groupes. Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard J (2012) Comptabilité et développement durable. Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Topel RC (1991) Specific capital, mobility, and wages: wages rise with job seniority. J Polit Econ 99(1):145–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernimmen P (1989) Finance d’entreprise. Dalloz, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Ferracci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferracci, P. (2016). IFRS and the Works Council in France. In: Bensadon, D., Praquin, N. (eds) IFRS in a Global World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28225-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics