Advertisement

Systemic Disturbances in Thesis Production Processes

  • Juha Kämäräinen
  • Erja Moore
  • Ilkka Mönkkönen
  • Jarmo Saarti
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)

Abstract

This paper discusses disturbances in thesis production processes that lead to anomalies in information use such as insufficient referencing and plagiarism in theses made in Finnish universities of applied sciences. We develop discussion concerning systemic dynamics of these anomalies. Four different cases of information use which are the result of vague referencing or plagiarism, and the possible solutions are presented. The librarians’ role on the borderline between traditional intermediary positions and their potential for more interventionist ones are discussed. Librarians can contribute to the thesis production processes in which several cultures of information seeking and use meet and challenge each other. Thesis production and evaluation processes are not homogenous. Instead, elements of machine-like systems as well as those of individuals’ unique being-in-the-world contexts appear together forming colonies of information use practices that can ignore problems in references and information seeking or allow plagiarism.

Keywords

Information use References Plagiarism Universities of applied sciences Theses 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the paper.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Buschman, J.: Dismantling the Public Sphere: Situating and Sustaining Librarianship in the Age of the New Public Philosophy. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ministry of Education and Culture. Ammattikorkeakoulujen Hallinto, Ohjaus ja Rahoitus (2015). http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Koulutus/ammattikorkeakoulutus/hallinto_ohjaus_ja_rahoitus/?lang=fi
  4. 4.
    Porra, J.: Colonial Systems, Information Colonies and Punctuated Prototyping. Doctoral Dissertation. Jyväskylä, Department of Computer Science and Information Processing, University of Jyväskylä (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engeström, Y.: Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kämäräinen, J.: Information Use in Bachelor Theses at the Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences: Multiple Case Study. Unpublished draft of doctoral dissertation, information studies. University of Oulu, Oulu (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heinonen, J.: Suomalaisten tiede- ja ammattikorkeakoulujen opinnäytetyöt ohjaajien silmin. Doctoral dissertation, pp. 55–56, 112–113. University of Tampere, Tampere (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore, E.: Accuracy of referencing and patterns of plagiarism in electronically published theses. Int. J. Educ. Integrity 10(1), 42–55 (2014). http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/viewFile/933/656Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity: Annual Report 2011 (2012). http://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/advisory_board_on_research_integrity_annual_report2011.pdf
  10. 10.
    Hardin, R.: Trust and Trustworthiness. Russell, Sage Foundation (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pankl, E., Coleman, J.: ”There’s Nothing on my Topic!” using the theories of oscar wilde and Henry Giroux to develop critical pedagogy for library instruction. In: Accardi, M.T., Drabinski, E., Kumbier, A. (eds.) Critical Library Instruction: Theories and Methods, pp. 3–12. Library Juice Press, Duluth (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kämäräinen, J., Saarti, J.: Library professionals’ and partners’ implicit principle of non-interference and writing-related interventions. QQML J. 3(4), 899–908 (2014). http://www.qqml.net/papers/December_2014_Issue/3411QQML_Journal_2014_KamarainenandSaarti_Dec_899-908.pdfGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heidegger, M.: Being and Time. In: Macquarrie, J., Robinson, E. (eds.). Harper & Row, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hjørland, B.: Facet analysis: the logical approach to knowledge organization. Inf. Process. Manage. 49(2), 545–557 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soergel, D.: Organizing Information: Principles of Data Base and Retrieval Systems. Academic Press, San Diego (1985)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rautopuro, J.: Sisyfoksen kivi. Tilastollisten menetelmien opetus ja oppiminen kasvatustieteissä. Jyväskylä, Jyväskylän yliopisto, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Tutkimuksia 27 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Camus, A.: The Myth of Sisyphus, and other Essays. Trans. Justin O’Brien. Vintage, New York (1955)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juha Kämäräinen
    • 1
  • Erja Moore
    • 2
  • Ilkka Mönkkönen
    • 3
  • Jarmo Saarti
    • 4
  1. 1.Information StudiesUniversity of OuluHyvinkääFinland
  2. 2.RääkkyläFinland
  3. 3.English DepartmentUniversity of HelsinkiHyvinkääFinland
  4. 4.University of Eastern Finland LibraryKuopioFinland

Personalised recommendations