Advertisement

Argument-Driven Inquiry in the Information Literacy Instruction in Taiwan

  • Lin Ching Chen
  • Yaw-Huei Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of argument-driven inquiry information literacy (IL) instruction on fifth-graders’ argumentative learning, and teachers’ opinions on the instruction. The research site was a fifth-grade classroom of 30 students in Taiwan and lasted seventeen weeks. IL instruction was taught a period of time per week by a teacher librarian, who collaborated with a classroom teacher. An inquiry project was used in the IL and Chinese courses. The Argument Test was used for the pretest and posttest. Research data was collected from interviews, participant observations, tests, and document analysis. Results showed that argument-driven inquiry was an effective project for cultivating these students’ argument skills; their overall argument performance improved significantly, though some challenges remained. Both the teacher librarian and classroom teacher suggested that we systematically design argument-driven inquiry projects in IL curriculum, to progressively improve students’ argumentative reasoning.

Keywords

Argumentative skills Argument-driven inquiry Information literacy instruction Big6 model 

References

  1. 1.
    Hillocks, G.: Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: an introduction. Engl. J. 99(6), 24–32 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuhn, D.: Education for Thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Newell, G.E., Beach, R., Smith, J., VanDerHeide, J.: Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: a review of research. Read. Res. Q. 46(3), 273–304 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Llewellyn, D.: Teaching High School Science Inquiry and Argumentation. Corwin, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hillocks, G.: Teaching Argument Writing, Grades 6-12: Supporting Claims with Relevant Evidence and Clear Reasoning. Heinemann, Portsmouth (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mason, L., Scirica, F.: Prediction of Students’ Argumentation Skills about Controversial Topics by Epistemological Understanding. Learn. Instr. 16, 492–509 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sandoval, W.A., Millwood, K.A.: The quality of students’ used of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cogn. Instr. 23, 23–55 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferretti, R.P., MacArthur, G.A., Dowdy, N.S.: The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. J. Educ. Psychol. 92(4), 694–702 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Midgette, E., Haria, P., MacArthur, C.: The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth and eighth-grade students. Read. Writ. 21(1/2), 131–151 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuhn, D., Udell, W.: The development of argument skills. Child Dev. 74(5), 1245–1260 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolfe, C.R., Britt, M.A., Butler, J.A.: Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Writ. Commun. 26(2), 183–209 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Walker, J.: Argument-Driven inquiry: a way to promote learning during laboratory activities. Sci. Teach. 76(8), 42–47 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurbanoglu, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R., Spiranec, S. (eds.): Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and. ECIL 2013. CCIS, 397. Springer, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chu, S.K., Tse, S.K., Loh, E.K., Chow, K.: Collaborative inquiry project-based learning: effects on reading ability and interests. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 33(3), 236–243 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eisenberg, M.B., Berkowitz, R.: Teaching Information & Technology Skills: The Big6 in Elementary Schools. Linworth, Worthington (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eisenberg, M.B., Robinson, L.E.: The Super3: Information Skills for Young Learners. Linworth, Worthington (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., Caspari, A.K.: Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, L.C., Huang, T.W., Yen, R.D.: The effects of inquiry-based integrated information literacy: four-year trends. J. Educ. Media Libr. Sci. 51(4), 561–595 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of E-Learning Design and ManagementNational Chiayi UniversityMingsuinTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringNational Chiayi UniversityChiayi CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations