Abstract
Higher education policy in Israel has many faces. On the one hand, policy reflects an approach that expresses common public interest and realization of public goals (i.e., quantity – increasing access to higher education for the general public), and on the other hand, higher education policy adheres to an approach that promotes academic-research interests and its goals (i.e., quality – excellence in scientific outputs), with emphasis on the lofty goal of producing new knowledge for humanity. The primary challenge of such a policy that concurrently embraces two approaches (which are potentially either complementary or mutually harmful, depending on your point of view), is a matter of proportions: which approach drives decision making in higher education, and which is merely a by-product of this policy. In the second decade of the twenty-first century, as the number of students soars, we are witnesses to higher education’s transformation into a product for the masses, a change that requires countries worldwide to find new models of academic leadership if they wish to maintain a balance between society’s needs and the needs of science and increased academic productivity. This chapter discusses the challenges of higher education in Israel, Israel’s attempt to respond to these challenges, and the strengths and weaknesses of the solution in light of the winds of change in Israel and global trends.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arun, R., Gamoran, A., & Shavit, Y. (2007). More inclusion and diversion: Expansion, differentiation, and market structure in higher education. In Y. Shavit, R. Arun, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Stratification in higher education: A comparison study (pp. 1–35). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance – an international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.
Ayalon, H., & Yogev, A. (2000). A window to the academic dream: Stratification and diversity in the expansion of Israeli higher education. Paper presented at the Calgary meeting of ISA-RC28, Calgary.
Ben David, N., & Shichor, T. (2012). Does increasing the minimum psychometric admission score increase success in undergraduate studies in the social sciences. Harivon Lekakala, 59(1–2), 51–77 [Hebrew].
Birch, E. R., & Miller, P. W. (2005). The determinants of students’ tertiary academic success. Perth: Business School, University of Western Australia.
Bolotin-Chachashvilli, S., Shavit, Y., & Ayalon, H. (2002). Expansion of higher education and its implications on stratification in Israel 1980–1996. Sotziologiya Yisraelit, D. 317–346. [Hebrew]
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: final report [Bradley review]. Retrieved from: http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv32134
Bridges, D., Juceviciene, P., Jucevicius, R., Mclaughlin, T. H., & Stankeviciute, J. (Eds.). (2014). Higher education and national development: Universities and societies in transition. New York: Routledge.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2013, March 2). Higher education in Israel – Press release on the occasion of the new academic year 2013. 276/212. Jerusalem. [Hebrew]
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic.
Council of Higher Education. (2012). The higher education system in Israel 2012 – On the path to growth. Retrieved from: http://che.org.il/. [Hebrew]
Council of Higher Education. (2014). The higher education system in Israel. Retrieved from: http://che.org.il/?page_id=399. [Hebrew]
Davidovitch, N. (2013). Paradigmatic changes in perceptions of disciplinary and multidisciplinary teaching in the higher education system: Fad or challenge? Israel Affairs, 19(4), 704–712.
Davidovitch, D., & Iram, Y. (2011). Globalization and higher education reforms: Legislation, policy and market forces in Israel. Educational Practice and Theory, 33(2), 43–62.
Davidovitch, N., & Iram, Y. (2014). Regulation, globalization and privatization of higher education: The struggle to establish a university In Israel. Journal of International Education Research, 10(3), 201–218.
Davidovitch, N., & Sinuani-Stern, Z. (2014). Compensation criteria in higher education in Israel and elsewhere: Evaluation of research and teaching outcomes. Journal of International Education Research, 10(4), 279–294.
Davidovitch, N., & Soen, D. (2006). Enhancing access in theory and practice: A study of graduates of a large Israeli public college in 1995–2003. International Education Journal, 7(3), 284–304. Retrieved from http://iej.cjb.net/
Davidovitch, N., & Soen, D. (2008). A college as a lever for graduates settling in the region: A case study of the College of Judea and Samaria. Israel Affairs, 15(1), 66–80.
Davidovitch, N., & Soen, D. (2015). Predicting academic success using admissions profiles. Journal of International Education Research, 11(3), 125–141.
Davidovitch, N., Soen, D., & Sinuani-Stern, Z. (2011). Performance measures of academic faculty: A case study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35(3), 355–373.
Davidovitch, N., Byalsky, M., Soen, D., & Sinuani-Stern, Z. (2013). The cost of more accessible higher education: What is the monetary value of the various academic degrees? A case study. Contemporary Issues in Education Research Journal, 6(1), 37–58.
De Boer, H., Huisman, J., & Meister‐Scheytt, C. (2010). Supervision in ‘modern’ university governance: Boards under scrutiny. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 317–333.
Dervin, F., & Zajda, J. (2015). Governance in education: Diversity and effectiveness. Paris: UNESCO.
Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2009). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence toward a common model? Governance, 22(3), 397–430.
Docampo, D. (2007). International comparisons in higher education funding. Higher Education in Europe, 32(4), 369–386.
Finnie, R., & Usher, A. (2007). Room at the top: Strategies for increasing the number of graduate students in Canada. C.D. Howe Institute, Education Papers 245.
Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1994). The university: For elites or for everyone? Psifas, Special supplement, 29–31. [Hebrew]
Habighurst, H. W. (1989). Education and social mobility in four societies. In R. Shapira & R. Peleg (Eds.), Sociology of education – An anthology (pp. 187–203). Tel Aviv: Am Oved [Hebrew].
Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2012). Research grants, sources of ideas and the effects on academic research. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper (12-048). Mannheim: ZEW-Centre.
Hottenrott, H., & Thorwarth, S. (2011). Industry funding of university research and scientific productivity. Kyklos, 64(4), 534–555.
Karen, D. (2002). Changes in access to higher education in the United States, 1820–1992. Sociology of Education, 75, 191–210.
Kenet-Cohen, T., Bruner, S., & Oren, K. (1999). Meta-analysis of the predictive validity of components of the university screening system in Israel for academic success. Megamot, 40, 54–71 [Hebrew].
Kirsh, A. (2010). Higher education policy in Israel – Accessibility, quality and excellence with limited resources. Haifa: Technion. Hebrew.
Klittgaard, R. (1986). Elitism and meritocracy in developing countries: Selection policies for higher education. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Liefrer, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469–489.
Lindberg, M. (2007). At the frontier of graduate surveys: Assessing participation and employability of graduates with master’s degree in nine European countries. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 53, 623–644.
McKenzie, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 21–33.
McLendon, M. K. (2003). State governance reform of higher education: Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVIII, pp. 57–143). Dordrecht: Springer.
Morrison, T. (1998). Welcome to the world: Quality, higher education and change. Mauritius: Mauritius Institute of Education.
Norton, A. (2012). Mapping Australian higher education. Carlton: Grattan Institute. Retrieved from: http://grattan.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/816-mapping-higher-education-2014.pdf
OECD. (2012). Factors, criteria or special circumstances used by tertiary institutions to determine access to the first stage of tertiary education. In Education at a glance 2012: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: http://dx.foi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en
Oren, K., Kenet-Cohem, T., & Bruner, S. (2007). Collated data on the validity of the university screening system in forecasting first-year students’ success (Classes of 2003–2008). Mannheim: NTAC. [Hebrew]
Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2010). The controversial policies of journal ratings: Evaluating social sciences and humanities. Research Evaluation, 19(5), 347–360.
Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., & Tumen, S. (2008). The predictability of enrolment and first- year university results from secondary school performance: The New Zealand National Certificate of educational achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 23(6), 685–698.
Skop, Y. (2014, September 1). Study: Psychometric score is better predictor of academic success than matriculation grades. Haaretz. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/education/.premium-1.2421288. [Hebrew]
Smith, J., & Naylor, R. A. (2001). Determinants of degree performance in UK universities: A statistical analysis of the 1993 student cohort. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 29–60.
Tandberg, D. (2010). The politics of state funding of public higher education. Educational Policy, 24(5), 735–778.
Toutkoushian, R., & Shafiq, M. M. (2010). A conceptual analysis of state support for higher education: Appropriations versus need-based financial aid. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 40–64.
Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Berkeley: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.
Vininger, A., & Teshler, N. (2014). Election in admission to higher education institutions and the psychometric exam. Jerusalem: Knesset, Research and Information Center [Hebrew].
Weiler, H. N. (2000). States, markets and university funding: New paradigms for the reform of higher education in Europe. Compare, 30(3), 333–339.
Zaslavsky, T., & Lev-Ari, L. (2009). Three-year longitudinal study: The connection between Oranim admission criteria (Matriculation and psychometric scores) and students’ achievements at the college (follow-up initiative). In M. Volitzker-Pollack (Ed.), Pedagogical initiatives and social involvement initiatives (pp. 1–46). Kiryat Tiv’on: Oranim Academic College of Education [Hebrew].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davidovitch, N. (2016). Contemporary Challenges of Higher Education in Israel. In: Zajda, J., Rust, V. (eds) Globalisation and Higher Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28191-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28191-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28190-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28191-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)