On ‘The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences’

  • Sorin BanguEmail author
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 25)


I present a reconstruction of Eugene Wigner’s argument for the claim that mathematics is ‘unreasonable effective’, together with six objections to its soundness. I show that these objections are weaker than usually thought, and I sketch a new objection.


Physical Space Physical Theory Mathematical Concept Euclidean Geometry Modern Mathematic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Thanks are due to the stimulating audience of the Models and Inferences in Science conference, in particular to the editors of this volume, Emiliano Ippoliti, Fabio Sterpetti, and Thomas Nickles. The responsibility for the final form of the text is entirely mine.


  1. Azzouni, J.: Applying mathematics: an attempt to design a philosophical problem. Monist 83(2), 209–227 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bangu, S.: Steiner on the applicability of mathematics and naturalism. Philosophia Math. (3) 14(1), 26–43 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bangu, S.: Wigner’s puzzle for mathematical naturalism. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 23(3), 245–263 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bangu, S.: The Applicability of Mathematics in Science: Indispensability and Ontology. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2012)Google Scholar
  5. Bourbaki, N.: The architecture of mathematics. Am. Math. Monthly 57, 221–232 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dirac, P.A.M.: The relation between mathematics and physics. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society (Edinburgh) (James Scott Prize Lecture), vol. 59, pp. 122–129 (1939)Google Scholar
  7. Doncel, M., et al.: Symmetries in Physics (1600–1980). Servei de Publicacions, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona (1987)Google Scholar
  8. Dyson, F.J.: Mathematics in the physical sciences. In: The Mathematical Sciences (ed.) Committee on Support of Research in the Mathematical Sciences (COSRIMS) of the National Research Council, pp. 97–115. MIT Press, Cambridge (1969)Google Scholar
  9. Dyson, F.: ‘Paul A. M. Dirac’ American Philosophical Society Year Book 1986 (1986)Google Scholar
  10. French, S.: The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics: partial structures and the application of group theory to physics. Synthese 125, 103–120 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ginammi, M.: Structure and Applicability. An Analysis of the Problem of the Applicability of Mathematics. PhD Dissertation, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (2014)Google Scholar
  12. Grattan-Guiness, I.: Solving Wigner’s mystery: the reasonable (though perhaps limited) effectiveness of’ mathematics in the natural sciences. Math. Intelligencer 30(3), 7–17 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamming, R.: The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics. Am. Math. Monthly 87(2), 81–90 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hawking, S. (ed.): God Created the Integers. Running Press, Philadelphia & London, The Mathematical Breakthroughs that Changed History (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Kline, M.: Mathematics in Western Culture. Oxford University Press, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  16. Kline, M.: Mathematics in the Modern World. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco (1968)Google Scholar
  17. Kline, M.: Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford University Press, New York (1972). (Vol. 3)Google Scholar
  18. Kline, M.: Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty. Oxford University Press, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  19. Maddy, P.: Second Philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagel, E.: ‘Impossible Numbers’ in Teleology Revisited. Columbia University Press, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  21. Pincock, C.: Mathematics and Scientific Representation. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Plantinga, A.: Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford University Press, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Riemann, B.: On the Hypotheses Which Lie At The Bases Of Geometry. Reprinted in Hawking (2007) (1854)Google Scholar
  24. Sarukkai, S.: Revisiting the ‘unreasonable effectiveness’ of mathematics. Curr. Sci. 88(3), 415–423 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, J.T.: The pernicious influence of mathematics on science. In: Kac, M., Rota, G.C., Schwartz, J.T. (eds.) Discrete Thoughts. Essays on Mathematics, Science and Philosophy. Birkhauser, Boston (1986)Google Scholar
  26. Steiner, M.: The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  27. Von Neumann, J.: The Mathematician. In: Newman, J.R. (ed.) The World of Mathematics, vol. 4, pp. 2053–2063. George Allen and Unwin, London (1961)Google Scholar
  28. Weinberg, S.: Lecture on the applicability of mathematics. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 33, 725–733 (1986)Google Scholar
  29. Weinberg, S.: Dreams of a Final Theory. Vintage, London (1993)Google Scholar
  30. Wigner, E.: The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13(1), 1–14 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilczek, F.: ‘Reasonably effective: I. Deconstructing a Miracle’, Physics Today, pp. 8–9 (2006)Google Scholar
  32. Wilczek, F.: ‘Reasonably effective: II. Devil’s advocate’, Physics Today, pp. 8–9 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations