Advertisement

Business Angels, Social Networks, and Radical Innovation

  • Catherine Deffains-Crapsky
  • Peter G. Klein
Chapter

Abstract

Innovation is critical for firm and national competitiveness. However, financing innovation is increasingly difficult for early-stage, high-risk projects, as banks and venture capital firms are focusing on later-stage, less risky projects. To fill this gap, US and European entrepreneurs are turning for seed funding to Business Angels (BAs) and Business Angel Networks (BANs). We describe the role of BAs and BANs in the US and Europe from the perspectives of entrepreneurship theory and social network theory. We show how BANs can strengthen ties between entrepreneurs and individual investors under highly uncertain conditions. We also study the links between formal and informal private equity finance, raising wider questions about the funding and performance of clusters of innovation. Finally, we suggest that differences in network characteristics, rather than the availability of projects, explain the large differences in the size and performance of the BA sectors in the US and Europe.

Keywords

Innovation Social networks Uncertainty Venture capital Business Angel 

JEL codes

G32 M13 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Jim Chappelow, Jingjing Wang, and Abel Malik Ola for assistance.

References

  1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amable, B. (2006). Innovation et compétitivité en Europe. Reflets et Perspectives, 45, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, C., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, J. A. C., Shipilov, A. V., & Rowley, T. J. (2003). Where do small worlds come from? Industrial & Corporate Change, 12(4), 697–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, R. S., Hogarth, R. M., & Michaud, C. (2000). The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11(2), 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, C. (1994). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Clercq, D., Meuleman, M., & Wright, M. (2012). A cross-country investigation of micro-angel investment activity: The roles of new business opportunities and institutions. International Business Review, 21(2), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deffains-Crapsky, C. (2002). L’analyse par les options réelles : apports en termes de valorisation de projets innovants et gestion stratégiques des opportunités d’investissement. Cahier de recherche du CREFIB 02-03.Google Scholar
  11. Deffains-Crapsky, C. (2010). Les apports et les limites de l'évaluation des projets innovants par les options réelles. Journées de Microéconomie Appliquée, JMA, Angers, Juin, France.Google Scholar
  12. Denis, D. J. (2004). Entrepreneurial finance: An overview of the issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(2), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EBAN. (2007a). Note synthétique sur les acteurs privés du capital risque informel.Google Scholar
  14. EBAN. (2007b). La contribution des business angels à la réalisation de la stratégie de Lisbonne, au Plan d’Action Communautaire en faveur de l’entrepreneuriat et au C.I.P. 2007–2013. Livre Blanc.Google Scholar
  15. EBAN. (2010). Statistics compendium.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrary, M. (1999). Confiance et accumulation de capital social dans la régulation des activités de crédit. Revue française de sociologie, 40(3), 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrary, M. (2001). Pour une théorie de l’échange dans les réseaux sociaux. Un essai sur le don dans les réseaux industriels de la Silicon Valley. Cahiers internationaux de Sociologie, 111, 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrary, M. (2006). Apprentissage collaboratif et réseaux d’investisseurs en capital-risque. Revue Française de Gestion, 163, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrary, M. (2009). Les capital-risqueurs comme “transiteurs” de l’innovation dans la Silicon Valley. Revue Française de Gestion, 190, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrary, M., & Dibiaggio, L. (2003). Communautés de pratique et réseaux sociaux dans la dynamique de fonctionnement des clusters de hautes technologies. Revue d’économie industrielle, 103, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society, 38(2), 326–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2010). Alertness, action, and the antecedents of entrepreneurship. Journal of Private Enterprise, 25(2), 145–164.Google Scholar
  23. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freear, J., Sohl, H. E., & Wetzel, W. (2002). Angles on angels: Financing technology-based ventures—A historical perspective. Venture Capital, 4(4), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Granovetter, M. (1995). The economic sociology of firms and entrepreneurs. In A. Portes (Ed.), The economic sociology of immigration: Essays on networks (pp. 128–165). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Harrison, R. T., & Mason, C. M. (2000). Venture capital market complementarities: The links between business angels and venture capital funds in the United Kingdom. Venture Capital, 2(3), 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  28. Hoang, H., & Antonic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ibrahim, D. M. (2010). Financing the next Silicon Valley. Washington University Law Review, 83(4), 717–762.Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerr, W. R., Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. (2010). The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: A regression discontinuity analysis, Harvard Business School, Working Paper 10-086.Google Scholar
  32. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kirzner, I. M. (1985). Discovery and the capitalist process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kizner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.Google Scholar
  35. Klein, P. G. (2012). Entrepreneurship and creative destruction. In B. Miniter (Ed.), The 4% solution: How to unleash the economic boom America needs in the twenty-first century (pp. 116–126). New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  36. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and MArx.Google Scholar
  37. Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. Z., & Wesphal, R. (2008). Do business angel networks deliver value to business angels? Venture Capital, 10(2), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larson, A., & Starr, A. J. (1993). A network model for organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 5–15.Google Scholar
  39. Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lerner, J. (2010). The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics, 35(3), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Litan, R. E., & Robb, A. M. (2012). A market-based approach for crossing the valley of death: The benefits of a capital gains exemption for investments in startups. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2000836
  42. Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (1995). Closing the regional equity gap: The role of informal venture capital. Small Business Economics, 7, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McFadyen, M. A., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, J. (2009). Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science, 20(3), 552–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mondelli, M. P., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Private equity and asset characteristics: The case of agricultural production. Working Paper, McQuinn Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, University of Missouri.Google Scholar
  45. Parker, S. C. (2008). The economics of formal business networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  47. Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sullivan, M. K., & Miller, A. (1996). Segmenting the informal venture capital market: Economic, hedonistic, and altruistic investors. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williamson, O. E. (1988). Corporate finance and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 567–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson, K. E. (2011). Financing high-growth firms: The role of angel investors. OECD Report. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1983115

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory GRANEM UMR-MA 49University of AngersAngersFrance
  2. 2.Hankamer School of BusinessBaylor UniversityWacoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Strategy and ManagementNorwegian School of EconomicsBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations