Evaluation of Differences in the Estimated Recrystallized Volume Using Different Methods Based on EBSD Data

  • András Mucsi
  • Péter VargaEmail author
Part of the Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics book series (TIEI, volume 12)


There are several methods that have been developed in the last decade which use the data extracted from EBDS measurement for the purpose of determining the recrystallized volume of deformed and annealed metals. Two general ideas could be identified: calculations based on the quality of indexing of the scanned points and calculations relying on the differences in crystallographic orientations. First, a simple method is presented utilizing the Image Quality (IQ) indexing of the EBSD data. Estimations were also made analyzing the orientation maps resulted from the same measurements. In the final section the applicability of the IQ based method is discussed in comparison to the misorientation (MO) technique. Based on the accuracy of the measured and calculated results the proposed method seems useful although both procedure offer unreliable estimations at low recrystallization rates.


Recrystallization EBSD 



This research has been supported by the assistance of the European Union, by the co-financing of the European Social Fund (TÁMOP-4.2.1.B-11/2/KMR-2011-0001). The authors are also grateful to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering of Budapest University of Technology and Economics to made the EBSD measurements possible.


  1. 1.
    Black, M.P., Higginson, R.L.: Investigation into the use of electron back scattered diffraction to measure recrystallised fraction. Scr. Mater. 41, 125–129 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu, H., Sivaprasad, P., Davies, C.H.J.: Treatment of misorientation data to determine the fraction of recrystallized grains in a partially recrystallized metal. Mater. Char. 51, 293–300 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dziaszyk, S., Payton, E.J., Friedel, F., Marx, V., Eggeler, G.: On the characterization of recrystallized fraction using electron backscatter diffraction: a direct comparison to local hardness in an if steel using nanoindentation. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 527, 7854–7864 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wright, S.I., Nowell, M.M.: EBSD image quality mapping. Microsc. Microanal. 12, 72–84 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lassen, N.C.K., Jensen, D.J.: Automatic recognition of recrystallized grains in partially recrystallized samples from crystal orientation maps. In: Szpunar, J. (ed.) Proceedings of ICOTOM 12, vol. 2, pp. 854–859. NRC Research Press, Ottawa (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humphreys, F.J.: Quantitative metallography by electron backscattered diffraction. J. Microsc. 195, 170–185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tarasiuk, J., Gerber, Ph, Bacroix, B.: Estimation of recrystallized volume fraction from EBSD data. Acta Mater. 50, 1467–1477 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, G., Jensen, D.J.: Automatic determination of recrystallization parameters based on EBSD mapping. Mater. Char. 59, 794–800 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Humphreys, F.J.: Grain and subgrain characterisation by electron backscatter diffraction. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 3833–3854 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Larsen, A.W., Jensen, D.J.: Automatic determination of recrystallization parameters in metals by electron backscatter pattern line scans. Mater. Char. 51, 271–282 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benchabanea, G., Boumerzouga, Z., Thibonb, I., Gloriant, T.: Recrystallization of pure copper investigated by calorimetry and microhardness. Mater. Char. 59, 1425–1428 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Donát Bánki Faculty of Mechanical and Safety EngineeringÓbuda UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations