Abstract
A transition to smart grids requires a wide range of changes in household energy behaviour. In this chapter we discuss four key issues important for understanding and promoting behaviour in smart grids. First, we need to identify which behaviour needs to be changed. A transition to smart grids involves changes in a wide range of energy behaviours, including the adoption of sustainable energy resources, energy-efficient technologies, and automated control technology; investments in energy efficiency measures in buildings such as insulation; and user behaviour. Second, we need to know which factors influence behaviour in smart grids. We discuss the role of motivations and contextual factors. Third, it is important to test effects of interventions aimed to promote smart energy behaviours. Interventions can be aimed at changing the actual costs and benefits of behaviour, or at changing people’s perceptions and evaluations of different costs and benefits of behavioural options. Fourth, we need to understand which factors influence the acceptability of energy policies and energy systems changes aimed to promote smart grids. In this chapter we address important findings from psychological studies on these topics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamse, W., Matthies, E.: Informational strategies to promote pro-environmental behaviour: changing knowledge, awareness and attitudes. In: Steg, L., van den Berg, A.E., de Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology: An introduction, pp. 223–243. Wiley, Oxford, UK (2012)
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L.: Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: the role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecol. Rev. 18(1), 30–40 (2011)
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L.: Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1773–1785 (2013)
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, Ch., Rothengatter, T.: A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psychol. 25, 273–291 (2005)
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, Ch., Rothengatter, T.: The effect of tailored information, goal setting and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors and behavioral antecedents. J. Environ. Psychol. 27, 265–276 (2007)
Bidwell, D.: The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy 58, 189–199 (2013)
Bockarjova, M., Steg, L.: Can protection motivation theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in The Netherlands. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 276–288 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.010
Bolderdijk, J.W., Gorsira, M., Keizer, K., Steg, L.: Values determine the (in)effectiveness of informational interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior. PLoS ONE 8(12), e83911 (2013a). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083911
Bolderdijk, J.W., Knockaert, J., Steg, E.M., Verhoef, E.T.: Effects of pay-as-you-drive vehicle insurance on young drivers’ speed choice: results of a Dutch field experiment. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 1181–1186 (2011)
Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L.: Promoting sustainable consumption: the risks of using financial incentives. In: Thøgersen, J., Reisch, L. (eds.) Handbook of Research in Sustainable Consumption. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2015)
Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L., Geller, E.S., Lehman, P.K., Postmes, T.: Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 413–416 (2013b). doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1767
Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L., Postmes, T.: Fostering support for work floor energy conservation policies: accounting for privacy concerns. J. Organ. Behav. 34, 195–210 (2013c)
Bradley, J.C., Waliczek, T.M., Zajicek, J.M.: Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. J. Environ. Educ. 30, 17–21 (1999)
Brandon, G., Lewis, A.: Reducing household energy consumption: a qualitative and quantitative field study. J. Environ. Psychol. 19, 75–85 (1999)
Butler, C., Parkhill, K.A., Pidgeon, N.: Deliberating energy transitions in the UK—transforming the UK energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability. UKERC, London (2013)
Clastres, C.: Smart grids: another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives. Energy Policy 39(9), 5399–5408 (2011)
Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Stern, P.C., Whitmarsh, L., Carrico, A., Steg, L., Swim, J., Bonnes, M.: Psychological research and global climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5(7), 640–646 (2015)
Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L., Dewitte, S.: Positive cueing: promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. Int. J. Res. Mark. 25(1), 46–55 (2008)
Corraliza, J.A., Berenguer, J.: Environmental values, beliefs, and actions. A situational approach. Environ. Behav. 32(6), 832–848 (2000)
De Groot, J.I.M., Steg, L.: Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ. Behav. 40(3), 330–354 (2008)
De Groot, J.I.M., Steg, L.: Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conserv. Lett. 2, 61–66 (2009)
Devine-Wright, P.: Public engagement with large-scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Clim. Change 2(1), 19–26 (2011)
Diekmann, A., Preisendörfer, P.: Green and greenback. The behaveioural effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality Soc. 15(4), 441–472 (2003)
Dogan, E., Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L.: Making small numbers count: environmental and financial feedback in promoting eco-driving behaviours. J. Consum. Policy 37, 413–422 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10603-014-9259-z
Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K.A., Laitner, J.A.: Advanced Metering Initiatives and Residential Feedback Programs: A Meta-Review for Household Electricity-Saving Opportunities. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C. (2010)
Evans, L., Maio, G. R., Corner, A., Hodgetts, C. J., Ahmed, S., Hahn, U.: Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 122–125 (2013)
Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energ. Effi. 1, 79–104 (2008)
Focella, E.S., Stone, J.: The use of hypocrisy for promoting environmentally sustainable behaviors. In: van Trijp, H.C.M. (ed.) Encouraging sustainable behaviour, pp. 203–215. Psychology Press, New York (2013)
Frondel, M., Ritter, N., Vance, C.: Heterogeneity in the rebound effect: further evidence for Germany. Energy Econ. 34(2), 461–467 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.016
Gangale, F., Mengolini, A., Onyeji, I.: Consumer engagement: an insight from smart grid projects in Europe. Energy Policy 60, 621–628 (2013)
Gatersleben, B., Steg, L.: Affective and symbolic aspects of environmental behaviour. In: Steg, L., van den Berg, A.E., de Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology: An introduction, pp. 165–174. Wiley, Oxford, UK (2012)
Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., Abrahamse, W.: Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemp. Soc. Sci. J. Acad. Soc. Sci. 9(4), 374–392 (2012)
Geelen, D., Reinders, A., Keyson, D.: Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services. Energy Policy 61, 151–161 (2013)
Geller, E.S.: The challenge of increasing proenvironmental behavior. In: Bechtel, R.B., Churchman, A. (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, pp. 525–540. Wiley, New York (2002)
Gellings, C.W., Samotyj, M.: Smart Grid as advanced technology enabler of demand response. Energy Effi. 6, 685–694 (2013). doi:10.1007/s12053-013-9203-0
Goulden, M., Bedwell, B., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Rodden, T., Spence, A.: Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2, 21–29 (2014)
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J.M., Van den Bergh, B.: Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98, 392–404 (2010)
Groothuis, P.A., Groothuis, J.D., Whitehead, J.C.: Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed. Energy Policy 36(4), 1545–1550 (2008)
Harland, P., Staats, H., Wilke, H.: Explaining proenvironmental behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29, 2505–2528 (1999)
Harland, P., Staats, H., Wilke, H.A.: Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(4), 323–334 (2007)
Hess, D.: Smart meters and public acceptance: comparative analysis and governance implications. Health Risk Soc. 16(3), 243–258 (2014)
Huijts, N.M.A., Molin, E.J.E., Steg, L.: Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(1), 525–531 (2012)
Kaklamanou, D., Jones, C.R., Webb, T.L., Walker, S.R.: Using public transport can make up for flying abroad on holiday: compensatory green beliefs and environmentally significant behavior. Environ. Behav. 47(2), 184–204 (2015)
Kobus, C.B.A., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J.P.L.: Washing when the sun is shining! How users interact with a household energy management system. Ergonomics 56(3), 451–462 (2013)
Krishnamurti, T., Schwartz, D., Davis, A., Fischhoff, B., Bruine de Bruin, W., Lave, L., Wang, J.: Preparing for smart grid technologies: a behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters. Energy Policy 41, 790–797 (2012)
Krueger, A.D., Parsons, G.R., Firestone, J.: Valuing the visual disamenity of offshore wind power projects at varying distances from the shore: an application on the Delaware shoreline. Land Econ. 87(2), 268–283 (2011)
Lanzini, P., Thøgersen, J.: Behavioural spillover in the environmental domain: an intervention study. J. Environ. Psychol. 40, 381–390 (2014)
Leijten, F.R.M., Bolderdijk, J.W., Keizer, K., Gorsira, M., Van der Werff, E., Steg, L.: Factors that influence consumers’ acceptance of future energy systems: the effects of adjustment type, production level, and price. Energ. Effi. 7, 973–985 (2014). doi:10.1007/s12053-014-9271-9
Lindenberg, S.M.: How cues in the environment affect normative behavior. In: Steg, L., Van den Berg, A.E., De Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, pp. 119–128. Wiley, Oxford, UK (2012)
Lokhorst, A.M., Werner, C., Staats, H., Van Dijk, E., Gale, J.L.: Commitment and behaviour change: a meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. Environ. Behav. 45, 3–34 (2013)
Mah, D.N.Y., van der Vleuten, J.M., Ip, J.C.M., Hills, P.R.: Governing the transition of socio-technical systems: a case study of the development of smart grids in Korea. Energy Policy 45, 133–141 (2012)
Midden, C., Ham, J.: Persuasive technology to promote pro-environmental behaviour. In Steg, L., van den Berg, A.E., de Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, pp. 243–25. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK (2012)
Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B., Cowen, L., Uzzell, D.: Does perception of automation undermine pro-environmental behaviour? Findings from three everyday settings. J. Environ. Psychol. 42, 139–148 (2015). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.002
Ngar-yin Mah, D., Van der Vleuten, J.M., Chi-man Ip, J., Hills, P.R.: Governing the transition of socio-technical systems: a case study of the development of smart grids in Korea. Energy Policy 45, 133–141 (2012)
Nolan, J.M., Schultz, P.W., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J., Griskevicius, V.: Normative social influence is underdetected. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 913–923 (2008)
Noppers, E., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L.: The adoption of sustainable innovations: driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environ. Change 25, 52–62 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012
Nordlund, A.M., Garvill, J.: Value structures behind pro-environmental behavior. Environ. Behav. 34, 740–756 (2002)
Oldfield, E.: Addressing energy poverty through smarter technology. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 31(2), 113–122 (2011)
Parkhill, K.A., Demski, C., Butler, C., Spence, A., Pidgeon, N.: Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability – Synthesis Report, UKERC, London (2013)
Perlaviciute, G.: Goal driven evaluations of sustainable products. PhD thesis, University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences (2014)
Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L.: Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: integrated review and research agenda. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 35, 361–381 (2014)
Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L.: The influence of values on evaluations of energy alternatives. Renew. Energy 77, 259–267 (2015)
Schuitema, G., Jakobsson Bergstad, C.J.: Acceptability of environmental policies (pp. 255–266). In: Steg, L., van den Berg,A.E., de Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, pp. 255–266. Wiley, Oxford, UK (2012)
Schuitema, G., Steg, L.: The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies. Trans. Res. F Psychol. Behav. 11, 221–231 (2008)
Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J., Cialdini, R., Goldstein, N., Griskevicius, V.: The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18, 429–434 (2007)
Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structures of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna, M. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 1–65. Academic Press, Orlando, FL (1992)
Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G.: Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal. 20(5), 713–720 (2000)
Sintov, N.D., Schultz, P.W.: Unlocking the potential of smart grid technologies with behavioral science. Front. Psychol. 6, 410 (2015)
Sovacool, B.K.: Diversity: energy studies need social science. Nature 511, 529–530 (2014)
Staats, H.J., Wit, A.P., Midden, C.Y.H.: Communicating the greenhouse effect to the public: evaluation of a mass media campaign from a social dilemma perspective. J. Environ. Manage. 45, 189–203 (1996)
Steg, L.: Environmental psychology and sustainable consumption. In: Thogersen, J., Reisch, L. (eds.) Handbook of Research in Sustainable Consumption. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2015)
Steg, L., De Groot, J.I.M.: Environmental values. In: Clayton, S. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, pp. 81–92. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)
Steg, L., Vlek, C.: Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29, 309–317 (2009)
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W.: Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. J. Environ. Psychol. 25(4), 415–425 (2005)
Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J.W., Keizer, K., Perlaviciute, G.: An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: the role of values, situational factors and goals. J. Environ. Psychol. 38, 104–115 (2014a). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van der Werff, E., Lurvink, J.: The significance of hedonic values for environmentally-relevant attitudes, preferences and actions. Environ. Behav. 46(2), 163–192 (2014b). doi:10.1177/0013916512454730
Stern, P.C.: Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. J. Consum. Policy 22, 461–478 (1999)
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., Guagnano, G.A.: Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25, 1611–1636 (1995)
Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L.: Acting green elicits a literal ‘warm glow’. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 37–40 (2014). doi:10.1038/nclimate2449
Ter Mors, E., Terwel, B.W., Daamen, D.D.L.: The potential of host community compensation in facility siting. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 11, S130–S138 (2012)
Terwel, B.W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D.D.L.: How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: The case of carbon dioxide capture and storage. J. Environ. Psychol. 29, 290–299 (2009)
Thøgersen, J.: Psychology: inducing green behavior. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 100–101 (2013)
Thøgersen, J., Ölander, F.: Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 23(3), 225–236 (2003)
Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., Sachs, O.: For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy 57, 160–171 (2013)
Truelove, H.B., Carrico, A.R., Weber, E.U., Raimi, K.T., Vandenbergh, M.P.: Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and theoretical framework. Glob. Environ. Change 29, 127–138 (2014)
U.S. National Research Council. In: Dietz, T., Stern, P. (eds.) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press (2008)
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L.: One model to predict them all: Predicting energy behaviours with the norm activation model. Energy Res. Social Sci. 6, 8–14 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.002
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., Keizer, K.: It is a moral issue: the relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1258–1265 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., Keizer, K.E.: Follow the signal: when past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. J. Environ. Psychol. 40, 273–282 (2014a). doi:10.1016/jenvp.2014.07.004
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., Keizer, K.E.: I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behaviour on environmental self-identity. Environ. Behav. 46(5), 626–657 (2014b). doi:10.1177/0013916512475209
Venhoeven, L.A., Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L.: Explaining the paradox: how pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability 5, 1372–1386 (2013). doi:10.3390/su5041372
Verbong, G.P.J., Beemsterboer, S., Sengers, F.: Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy 52, 117–125 (2013)
Walker, B.J., Wiersma, B., Bailey, E.: Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: an experimental study in England. Energy Res. Social Sci. 3, 46–54 (2014)
Weenig, M.W.H., Midden, C.J.H.: Communication network influences on information diffusion and persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61, 734–742 (1991)
Winett, R.A., Leckliter, I.N., Chinn, D.E., Stahl, B., Love, S.Q.: Effects of television modeling on residential energy conservation. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 18, 33–44 (1985)
Wolsink, M.: Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11(6), 1188–1207 (2007)
Wolsink, M.: The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 822–835 (2012)
Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, G.: Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: an empirical study based on norm activation model. Energy Policy 62, 1120–1127 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.036
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Werff, E., Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L. (2016). Transition to Smart Grids: A Psychological Perspective. In: Beaulieu, A., de Wilde, J., Scherpen, J. (eds) Smart Grids from a Global Perspective. Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28077-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28077-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28075-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28077-6
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)