Feature-Space Transformation Improves Supervised Segmentation Across Scanners
Image-segmentation techniques based on supervised classification generally perform well on the condition that training and test samples have the same feature distribution. However, if training and test images are acquired with different scanners or scanning parameters, their feature distributions can be very different, which can hurt the performance of such techniques.
We propose a feature-space-transformation method to overcome these differences in feature distributions. Our method learns a mapping of the feature values of training voxels to values observed in images from the test scanner. This transformation is learned from unlabeled images of subjects scanned on both the training scanner and the test scanner.
We evaluated our method on hippocampus segmentation on 27 images of the Harmonized Hippocampal Protocol (HarP), a heterogeneous dataset consisting of 1.5T and 3T MR images. The results showed that our feature space transformation improved the Dice overlap of segmentations obtained with an SVM classifier from 0.36 to 0.85 when only 10 atlases were used and from 0.79 to 0.85 when around 100 atlases were used.
KeywordsBrain Hippocampus Machine learning MRI Transfer learning
This research is financed by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).
- 4.Dill, V., Franco, A., Pinho, M.: Automated methods for hippocampus segmentation: the evolution and a review of the state of the art. Neuroinformatics 1, 1–18 (2014)Google Scholar
- 9.Boccardi, M., Bocchetta, M., Morency, F., Collins, D., Nishikawa, M., Ganzola, R., Grothe, M., Wolf, D., Redolfi, A., Pievani, M., et al.: Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol. Alzheimer’s Dement. 11(2), 175–183 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bron, E., Steketee, R., Houston, G., Oliver, R., Achterberg, H., Loog, M., Swieten, J., Hammers, A., Niessen, W., Smits, M., et al.: Diagnostic classification of arterial spin labeling and structural MRI in presenile early stage dementia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35(9), 4916–4931 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar