Abstract
The important role of doctoral engineers as the next generation of scientific and technology leaders, who will underpin the competitiveness of the industry base, has been recognised among international R&D stakeholders and policy makers. In the UK, the Engineering Doctorate (EngD) programme was established 20 years ago as a scheme distinct from, and complementary to, the traditional PhD. The EngD is differentiated from PhD programmes as it expects doctoral researchers (Research Engineers: REs) to work closely with industry, by helping researchers acquire industry relevant skills as well as industry based research experience, while based in a company. This chapter draws on a pilot study conducted in 2013, which investigated the various forms of impacts resulting from EngD programmes—including the perceptions of business partners who fund research projects and host the REs, and the career destinations of the former REs. Four key routes to impacts are proposed as a conceptual framework in order to understand the variety of impacts of the collaborative doctoral training.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Butcher J, Jeffrey P (2007) A view from the coal face: UK research student perceptions of successful and unsuccessful collaborative projects. Res Policy 36:1239–1250
Confederation of British Industry (CBI) (2010) Business–university collaboration for research and innovation. http://www.suport-project.eu/dvd/languages/assets/en_assets/assets/training/sme/3/bg/1.pdf. Last accessed 3 Oct 2013
de Campos A (2010) A note on the economic impact assessment of the research councils. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/publications/EconImpactNote.pdf. Last accessed 3 Oct 2013
DTI (2007) Measuring economic impacts of investment in the research base and innovation—a new framework for measurement
DTZ/EPSRC (2011) The Economic Impact Study of Innovative Manufacturing Research Centres (IMRCs) http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/newsevents/pubs/economic-impact-of-the-innovative-manufacturing-research-centres-final-report/. Last accessed 13 Aug 2014
Kitagawa F (2015) Understanding the EngD impact—a pilot study. A study conducted for the EPSRC and AEngD, Sept 2015. http://www.aengd.org.uk/files/4114/4196/1321/Understanding_the_EngD_Impact.v6_with_cover.pdf
Lowe T (2013) New development: the paradox of outcomes—the more we measure, the less we understand. Publ Money Manag 33(3):213–216
O’Sullivan E (2011) A review of international approaches to manufacturing research. http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/Resources/Reports/2011int_man_research.pdf. Last accessed 31 July 2013
Parnaby J (1990) The Engineering Doctorate. A SERC Working Party report to the Engineering Board of the Science and Engineering Research Council, June 1990
PA Consulting Group/SQW Consulting (2007) Study on the economic impact of the research councils Part I Summary. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/keireports/EconomicImpactResearchCouncilsPart1Summary.pdf. Last accessed 31 Mar 2014
Rogers J, Youtie J, Kay L (2012) Program level assessment of research centers: contribution of Nano-Science and Engineering Centers (NSEC) to US Nanotechnology National Initiative (NNI) Goals. Res Eval 21(5):368–380
Salter AJ, Martin BR (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Res Policy 30:509–532
Thune T (2009) Doctoral students on the university-industry interface: a review of the literature. High Educ 58:637–651
Upton S, Vallance P, Goddard J (2014) From outcome to process: evidence for a new approach to research impact assessment. Res Eval 23:352–365
Vitae (2012) A career development perspective of UK researcher-business interactions 2012. http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/upload/Vitae%20Researcher-Business%20Interactions%20April%202012.pdf. Last accessed 20 July 2012
Youtie J, Kay L, Melkers J (2013) Biographic coupling and network analysis to assess knowledge coalescence in a research center environment. Res Eval 22(3):145–156
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203
Acknowledgements
This chapter draws on the report “Understanding the EngD impact—a Pilot study” which was conducted in 2013–14 supported by the Association of the Engineering Doctorates (AEngD) and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). The views expressed in this chapter are solely the responsibility of the author and do not reflect those of the funders of the study.
A full report is available on the website of the EPSRC and AEngD (Kitagawa 2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kitagawa, F. (2016). The Impact of EngD—Dynamics of Collaborative Relationships Through Employer Engagement in Doctoral Research Training. In: Bhamidimarri, R., Liu, A. (eds) Engineering and Enterprise . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27825-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27825-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27824-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27825-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)