Advertisement

Excessive Regulation Through Bureaucratic Bullying: Evaluating Broadcast Regulation in South Asia

  • Azmat Rasul
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

This article highlights the intricacies and perplexities involved in policymaking in the area of communication. Policymaking in the field of communication is considered a measured intervention by the government in the structural designs and business plans of companies offering media and communication services. In developing countries such as India and Pakistan, where privatization of electronic media and its regulation are nascent experiences, communication regulation grows even more complex. This study compares broadcasting regulation in Pakistan and India through the lens of normative models of media performance. The article examines why and how the bureaucratic powers have hampered the process of broadcast regulation in India and Pakistan. The comparison is heuristically significant despite social and political difference between Pakistan and India, as both countries have inherited similar laws governing broadcasting from the British colonial rule and most of the pre-partition regulations are still in place. The article concludes that a great deal of political effort is required to establish independent regulatory authorities in both countries due to the overarching control of bureaucracies in both societies.

Keywords

Normative theories Broadcast regulation Communication industry Diversity Media laws 

References

  1. Ali, O. A., & Gunaratne, S. A. (2000). Pakistan. In S. A. Gunaratne (Ed.), Handbook of the media in South Asia (pp. 155–181). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Altschull, H. J. (1995). Agents of power. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. W. (1992). The place of principles in policy analysis. In J. M. Gillroy & M. Wade (Eds.), The moral dimension of public policy choice: Beyond the market paradigm (pp. 387–409). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aufderheide, P. (2007). Communication policy and the public interest. In D. Graber (Ed.), Media power in politics (pp. 364–375). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bagdikian, B. (2004). The media monopoly. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, M. (1955). Regulatory business by independent commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2004). The information age: Economy, society, and culture. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Dar, N. (2008, October 25). Information revolution in Pakistan. The Nation, 16.Google Scholar
  9. Garry, P. M. (1994). Scrambling for protection: The new media and the first amendment. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  10. Harcup, T. (2003). The unspoken-said: The journalism of alternative media. Journalism, 4(3), 356–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassan, M. (2002). Journalism for all. Lahore: Fazal Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Hijazi, M. A. (1995). Mass communication: Theory and practice. Lahore: A-One Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Husband, C. (2005). Minority ethnic media as communities of practice: Professionalism and identity politics in interaction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(3), 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (1998, 1999). World telecommunication development report. Geneva: ITU.Google Scholar
  15. Jabbar, J. (2003, September 19). Community-base radio and TV. Dawn, 5.Google Scholar
  16. Jabbar, J., & Isa, Q. F. (Comps.). (1997). Mass media laws and regulations in Pakistan—And a commentary from historical perspective. Singapore: AMIC.Google Scholar
  17. Javed, M. M. (2002). Regulation, competition, and information. The Pakistan Development Review, 41(4), 911–913.Google Scholar
  18. Joseph, A. (2009, June 20). Broadcast regulation in the public interest: A backgrounder [Online]. Info Change India. Available http://infochangeindia.org/Media/Broadcast-Laws-and-Regulations/Broadcast-regulation-in-the-public-interest-A-backgrounder.html
  19. Kemal, A. R. (2002). Regulatory framework in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 41(4), 319–332.Google Scholar
  20. Khan, R. Q. (2008, June 30). Development of electronic media in Pakistan. The Post, A6.Google Scholar
  21. Kumar, K. J. (1995). Media education, communications and public policy: An Indian perspective. Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House.Google Scholar
  22. Kumar, K. J., & Thomas, A. O. (2006). Telecommunications and development: The cellular mobile ‘revolution’ in India and China. Journal of Creative Communications, 3(1), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laffont, J. J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in regulation and procurement. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ludes, P. (2008). Convergence and fragmentation. Chicago: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  25. McChesney, R. W. (2008). The political economy of media: Enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  26. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. McQuail, D. (2005). Mass communication theory. New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Napoli, P. M. (2002). Audience valuation and minority media: An analysis of the determinants of the value of radio audiences. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Napoli, P. M. (2003). Foundations of communication policy: Principles and processes in regulation of electronic media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  30. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority. (n.d.). Retrieved June 14, 2009, from http://www.pemra.gov.pk/index.html
  32. Rasul, A. (2004). Role of radio in development: The case of Pakistan. Journal of Mass Communication, 11(2), 54–67.Google Scholar
  33. Rasul, A. (2009, July). Audience frames vs. media frames: Coverage of politico-judicial crisis in Pakistan. Paper Presented at Annual AMIC Conference New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  34. Robison, K. K., & Crenshaw, E. M. (2002). Post-industrial transformations and cyber-space: A cross-national analysis of internet development. Social Science Research, 31, 334–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 2, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tahir, S. N. (1996). Television in Pakistan: An overview. In D. French & M. Richards (Eds.), Contemporary television: Eastern perspectives (pp. 113–131). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Thussu, D. K. (1999). Privatizing the airwaves: The impact of globalization on broadcasting in India. Media Culture and Society, 21, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Werbach, K. (1997). The digital tornado: The internet and telecommunications policy (Federal Communication Commission, Office of Plans and Policy Working Paper #29). Washington, DC: Federal Communication Commission.Google Scholar
  39. Zeitlin, A. (1999, February 23). Movement afoot to ease government control of broadcast media in Pakistan [Online]. The Freedom Forum. Available http://www.freedomforum.org/international/1999/2/23pakistan.asp

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CommunicationFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations