Skip to main content

Exploiting Microdata Annotations to Consistently Categorize Product Offers at Web Scale

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 239))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Semantically annotated data, using markup languages like RDFa and Microdata, has become more and more publicly available in the Web, especially in the area of e-commerce. Thus, a large amount of structured product descriptions are freely available and can be used for various applications, such as product search or recommendation. However, little efforts have been made to analyze the categories of the available product descriptions. Although some products have an explicit category assigned, the categorization schemes vary a lot, as the products originate from thousands of different sites. This heterogeneity makes the use of supervised methods, which have been proposed by most previous works, hard to apply. Therefore, in this paper, we explain how distantly supervised approaches can be used to exploit the heterogeneous category information in order to map the products to set of target categories from an existing product catalogue. Our results show that, even though this task is by far not trivial, we can reach almost \(56\,\%\) accuracy for classifying products into 37 categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://webdatacommons.org/structureddata/index.html#toc3.

  2. 2.

    http://blog.commoncrawl.org/2015/01/december-2014-crawl-archive-available/.

  3. 3.

    Similar to our previous works [9], we will analysis the data based on PLDs embedding certain vocabularies, classes and properties.

  4. 4.

    http://blog.schema.org/2012/11/good-relations-and-schemaorg.html.

  5. 5.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/ss/08/11/1107_ecommerce/12.htm.

  6. 6.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/research-markets-worlds-leading-e-154500570.html.

  7. 7.

    http://www.alexa.com/.

  8. 8.

    http://webdatacommons.org/structureddata/2014-12/stats/schema_org_subsets.html.

  9. 9.

    http://www.gs1.org/gpc.

  10. 10.

    http://webdatacommons.org/structureddata/2014-12/products/gs.html.

  11. 11.

    As for each class, only one example exists k needs to be set to 1, otherwise the method would consider other examples then the nearest, which by design belong to another class. This setup is equal to Nearest Centroid Classification, where each feature vector of Cat is equal to one centroid.

  12. 12.

    As stated before, such instances are counted as false negatives within the evaluation.

  13. 13.

    We thank Stefano Faralli for his valuable feedback and recommendations.

  14. 14.

    https://support.google.com/merchants/answer/1705911?hl=en.

  15. 15.

    http://www.linguatools.de/disco/disco_en.html.

  16. 16.

    We also applied up-sampling of under-represented classes in the dataset, but the results did not improve.

References

  1. Bizer, C., Eckert, K., Meusel, R., Mühleisen, H., Schuhmacher, M., Völker, J.: Deployment of RDFa, microdata, and microformats on the web – a quantitative analysis. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Domingos, P., Lowd, D.: Markov logic: An interface layer for artificial intelligence. Synth. Lect. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 3(1), 1–155 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Eberius, J., Thiele, M., Braunschweig, K., Lehner, W.: Top-k entity augmentation using consistent set covering. In: SSDBM 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guha, R.V.: Schema.org update. http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2014/slides/ldow2014_keynote_guha_schema_org.pdf, April 2014

  5. Kolb, P.: Disco: A multilingual database of distributionally similar words.In: Proceedings of KONVENS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lehmberg, O., Ritze, D., Ristoski, P., Meusel, R., Paulheim, H., Bizer, C.: Mannheim Search Join Engine. Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Web Semantics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meusel, R., Bizer, C., Paulheim, H.: A web-scale study of the adoption and evolution of the schema.org vocabulary over time. In: Proceedings WIMS 2015, pp. 15:1–15:11. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meusel, R., Paulheim, H.: Heuristics for fixing errors in deployed schema.org microdata. In: Extended Semantic Web Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meusel, R., Petrovski, P., Bizer, C.: The webdatacommons microdata, RDFa and microformat dataset series. In: Mika, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8796, pp. 277–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mika, P.: Microformats and RDFa deployment across the Web (2011). http://tripletalk.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/rdfa-deployment-across-the-web/

  11. Mika, P., Potter, T.: Metadata statistics for a large web corpus. In: LDOW 2012, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 937. CEUR-ws.org (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen, H., Fuxman, A., Paparizos, S., Freire, J., Agrawal, R.: Synthesizing products for online catalogs. Proc. VLDB Endow. 4(7), 409–418 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Noessner, J., Niepert, M., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Rockit: Exploiting parallelism and symmetry for MAP inference in statistical relational models. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Analyzing schema.org. In: Mika, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8796, pp. 261–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petrovski, P., Bryl, V., Bizer, C.: Integrating product data from websites offering microdata markup. In: DEOS 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qiu, D., Barbosa, L., Dong, X.L., Shen, Y., Srivastava, D.: Dexter: Large-scale discovery and extraction of product specifications on the web. Proc. VLDB Endowment 8(13), 2194–2205 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritze, D., Lehmberg, O., Bizer, C.: Matching html tables to dbpedia. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, p. 10. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Meusel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meusel, R., Primpeli, A., Meilicke, C., Paulheim, H., Bizer, C. (2015). Exploiting Microdata Annotations to Consistently Categorize Product Offers at Web Scale. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Jannach, D. (eds) E-Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 239. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27729-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27729-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27728-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27729-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics