Skip to main content

Decision Support Through Carbon Management Accounting—A Framework-Based Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Purpose: Managing corporate carbon performance has seen a rapid development as a topic for the past decade. To effectively reduce corporate climate change impacts requires decisions on tracking and tracing of carbon emissions in a systematic manner. Yet, methods to manage information on corporate carbon performance have hardly been discussed in the extant literature. Whilst the global greenhouse gas emissions are further increasing, the total amount of corporate emissions has only decreased in some advanced companies. This raises the question of what decision situations a performance oriented carbon management accounting could support and in which areas research could be further developed to support carbon management efficiently and effectively. Method: A literature review was conducted to identify the current state of development of CMA. Relevant publications were analysed by means of taxonomic analysis. Findings: The analysis of academic CMA publications shows that the existing contributions on CMA methods only support few decision situations, still leaving many areas open for future research and practice. Implications: This chapter highlights the need for decision oriented research that enables CMA to fulfil its objective, i.e. to contribute to the efficient and effective reduction of carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almihoub A, Mula J, Rahman M (2013) Are there effective accounting ways to determining accurate accounting tools and methods to reporting emissions reduction? J Substain Develop 6(4). doi:10.5539/jsd.v6n4p118

  • Ascui F (2014) A review of carbon accounting in the social and environmental accounting literature: what can it contribute to the debate? Soc Environ Account J 34(1):6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascui F, Lovell H (2012) Carbon accounting and the construction of competence. J Clean Prod 36:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J, Larrinaga-González C (2008) Carbon trading: accounting and reporting issues. Eur Account Rev 17(4):697–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett M, Schaltegger S, Zvezdov D (2013) Exploring corporate practices in management accounting for sustainability. Institute for Chartered Accountants of England and Wales (ICAEW), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable(BIER) (2011) A practical perspective on water accounting in the beverage sector. Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable (BIER) (2013) Research on the carbon footprint of beer. Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki P, Waldorf D (1981) Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Soc Methods Res 10(2):141–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen F, Wittneben B (2011) Carbon accounting: Negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields. Acc Auditing Accountability J 24(8):1022–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzolan S, Cho CH, Michelon G (2013) Impression management and organizational audiences: the fiat group case, J Bus Ethics 126:143–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley P, Druckman A, Jackson T (2013) The development of commercial local area resource and emissions modelling—navigating towards new perspectives and applications. J Clean Prod 42:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt T, Howard M, Hwang A, Kobayashi Y, Lu J, Lyons C, Masood A, Suh J (2011) Measuring carbon efficiency, CA, UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui B, Truong TP (2013) Drivers of tight carbon control. In: Performance management conference Australasian, At Queenstown, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunse K, Vodicka M, Schönsleben P, Brülhart M, Ernst FO (2011) Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management—gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. J Clean Prod 19(6):667–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt RL, Schaltegger S (2012) Measuring the (un-)sustainability of industrial biomass production and use. Sustain Acc Manage Policy J 3(2):109–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Burritt R, Hahn T, Schaltegger S (2002) Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting, links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Aust Acc Rev 12:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Burritt R, Schaltegger S, Zvezdov D (2011) Carbon management accounting: explaining practice in leading German companies. Aust Acc Rev 21(1):80–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacho OJ, Hean RL, Wise RM (2003) Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives. Aust J Agric Res Econ 47(2):153–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro F, Corbett CJ, Tan T, Zuidwijk RA (2011) Carbon-optimal and carbon-neutral supply chains. UCLA Working paper, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), IBM (2008) Carbon disclosure project report 2008. FTSE 350 Building business resilience to inevitable climate change. CDP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) (2013) Global 500 climate change report 2013. CDP, London & New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper S, Pearce G (2011) Climate change performance measurement, control and accountability in english local authority areas. Acc Auditing Accountability J 24(8):1097–1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig A, Sheffi Y, Blanco E (2013) A supply chain view of product carbon footprints: results from the banana supply chain. EDS Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • De Aguiar TRS, Fearfull A (2010) Global climate change and corporate disclosure: pedagogical tools for critical accounting? Soc Environ Accountability J 30(2):64–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derwall J, Guenster N, Bauer R, Koedijk K (2005) The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Fin Anal J 61(2):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels A (2009) The European Emissions trading scheme: an exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon. Acc Organ Soc 34:488–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf C, Lovell A, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gielen DJ, Moriguchi Y, Yagita H (2002) CO2-emission reduction for Japanese petrochemicals. J Clean Prod 10(6):589–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green W, Li Q (2012) Evidence of an expectation gap for greenhouse gas emissions assurance. Acc Auditing Accountability J 25(1):146–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güereca LP, Torres N, Noyola A (2013) Carbon footprint as a basis for a cleaner research institute in Mexico. J Clean Prod 47:396–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh M, Shapiro M (2012) Carbon reporting: does it matter? Acc Auditing Accountability J 25(1):105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins LH (1999) Natural Capitalism. Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, Colorado, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman AJ (2006) Getting ahead of the curve: corporate strategies that address climate change. Prepared for the pew centre on global climate change

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann VH, Busch T (2008) Corporate carbon performance indicators. J Ind Ecol 12(4):505–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua G, Cheng TCE, Wang S (2011) Managing carbon footprints in inventory management. Int J Prod Econ 132(2):178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YA, Lenzen M, Weber CL, Murray J, Matthews HS (2009) The role of input–output analysis for the screening of corporate carbon footprints. Econ Syst Res 21(3):217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppes G, Ishikawa M (2005) A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. J Ind Ecol 9(4):25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jawjit W, Kroeze C, Rattanapan S (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions from rubber industry in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18(5):403–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JK (2012) Product carbon footprint developments and gaps. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 42(4):338–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH (2011) Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. J Clean Prod 19:1216–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH (2012) Carbon accounting for supply chain management in the automobile industry. J Clean Prod 36:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Cheong IM (2011) Measuring a carbon footprint and environmental practice: the case of Hyundai Motors Co. (HMC). Ind Manage Data Syst 111(6):961–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann L (2009) Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: the cases of carbon and cost-benefit. Acc Organ Soc 34(3–4):499–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinov-Bennie N (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions reporting and assurance: reflections on the current state. Sustain Acc Manage Policy J 3(2):244–251

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon A (2010) Green Logistics. The Carbon Agenda, LogForum 6(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon AC, Piecyk MI (2012) Setting targets for reducing carbon emissions from logistics: current practice and guiding principles. Carbon Manage 3(6):629–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minx J, Wiedmann T, Wood R, Peters G, Lenzen M, Owen A, Scott K, Barrett J, Hubacek K, Bajocchi G, Paul A, Dawkins E, Briggs J, Guan D, Suh S, Ackermann F (2009) Input-output analysis and carbon footprinting, an overview of applications. Econ Syst Res 21(3):187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy V, Parisi C (2013) A meta-analysis of two decades of sustainability accounting literature: observations and future directions. Paper presented at the 7th Asia Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting conference (APIRA 2013), Kobe, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WL, Robson K (2004) Basics of social research. Pearson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Okereke C (2007) An exploration of the motivations, drivers and barriers to carbon management: The UK FTSE 100. Eur Manage J 25(6):475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie A, Leech J, Collins K (2012) Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. Qual Rep 17(28):1–28. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss28/

  • Oshika T, Oka S, Saka C (2012) Connecting the environmental activities of firms with the return on carbon (ROC): mapping and empirically testing the sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC). J Manage Acc 2:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino C, Lodhia S (2012) Climate change accounting and the Australian mining industry: exploring the links between corporate disclosure and the generation of legitimacy. J Clean Prod 36:68–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (1997) Economics of Life cycle assessment (LCA). Inefficiency of the present approach. Bus Strategy Environ 6(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (1998) Accounting for eco-efficiency. In: Nath B, Hens L, Compton P, Devuyst D (eds) Environmental management in practice, vol I., Instruments for environmental managementRoutledge, London, pp 272–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Csutora M (2012) Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges. J Clean Prod 36:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Gibassier D, Zvezdov D (2013) Is Environmental Management Accoun­ting a Discipline? A Bibliometric Literature Review. Meditari Accountancy Research 21(1): 4-31

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Sturm A (1990) Ökologische Rationalität (in German: ecological rationality). Die Unternehmung 4:273–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny S, Business Council for Sustainable Development (BCSD) (1992) Changing the course. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M (2009) Carbon accounting and carbon footprint—more than just diced results? Int J Climate Change Strategies Manage 1(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek F (1994) Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch?, (in German: how much environment does a person use?). Birkhäuser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scipioni A, Manzardo A, Mazzi A, Mastrobuono M (2012) Monitoring the carbon footprint of products: a methodological proposal. J Clean Prod 36:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao L, Chen GQ, Chen ZM, Guo S, Han MY, Zhang B, Ahmad B (2014) Systems accounting for energy consumption and carbon emission by building. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 19(6):1859–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley JP (1997) The ethnographic interviewer. International Thomson, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stechemesser K, Günther E (2012) Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 36:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan R, Gouldson A (2012) Does voluntary carbon reporting meet investors’ needs? J Clean Prod 36:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W-H, Shen Y-S, Lee P-L, Chen H-C, Kuo L, Huang C-C (2012) Integrating information about the cost of carbon through activity-based costing. J Clean Prod 36:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers I, Vaze P, Corr L, Kasperova E, Fergus L. (2009) SMEs in a Low Carbon Economy, Enterprise Directorate, Department of Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker E, Lovins A, Lovins L (1997) Factor four. Doubling wealth, halving resource use. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker EU, Hargroves K, Smith M. (2009). Factor five. Transforming the global economy through 80 % improvements in resource productivity. A report to the Club of Rom. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber C (2011) Uncertainty and Variability in Carbon Footprinting for Electronics Case Study of an IBM Rackmount Server. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H (2007) Models of decision making and residential energy use. Ann Rev Environ Res 32:169–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, McCollum D, McCarthy R, Leighty W (2009) Meeting an 80 % reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transportation by 2050: A case study in California. Transport Res Part D: Trans Environ 14(3):147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitar Zvezdov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zvezdov, D., Schaltegger, S. (2015). Decision Support Through Carbon Management Accounting—A Framework-Based Literature Review. In: Schaltegger, S., Zvezdov, D., Alvarez Etxeberria, I., Csutora, M., Günther, E. (eds) Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27718-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics