Skip to main content

Maximising Student Success with Automatic Formative Feedback for Both Teachers and Students

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Assisted Assessment. Research into E-Assessment (TEA 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 571))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses the outcomes from the building and empirical investigation of two automatic feedback systems, namely OpenMentor and OpenEssayist that can support student learning. The findings from OpenMentor and OpenEssayist usage suggest that prompt targeted feedback for time poor students can maximise student success. Both systems facilitate the users to take ownership and reflect on their own work, through provision of feedback at a point where they can build on it in subsequent tasks. This should have the most impact on the users’ understanding of the requirements of academic writing and the tutors’ understanding of feedback for academic writing. The systems are also starting to be used as research tools that allow pedagogical strategies to be open to test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Grails is an open source web application framework.

  2. 2.

    Natural Language Processing Toolkit, see http://nltk.org/.

References

  1. Nonis, S.A., Hudson, G.I.: Academic performance of college students: influence of time spent studying and working. J. Educ. Bus. 81(3), 151–159 (2006). doi:10.3200/JOEB.81.3.151-159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Metcalf, H.: Increasing inequality in higher education: the role of term-time working. Oxford Rev. Educ. 29(3), 315–329 (2003). doi:10.1080/03054980307447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitelock, D.: Activating assessment for learning: are we on the way with web 2.0? In: Lee, M.J.W., McLoughlin, C. (eds.) Web 2.0-Based-E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching, pp. 319–342. IGI Global (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbs, G., Simpson, C.: Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning? Learn. Teach. High. Educ. 1, 3–31 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evans, C.: Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Rev. Educ. Res. 83(1), 80–120 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(1), 81–112 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D.: Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 31(2), 199–218 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J.: Feedback: focusing attention on engagement. Stud. High. Educ. 36(8), 879–896 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bales, R.F.: A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 15, 257–263 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitelock, D., Watt, S.N.K., Raw, Y., Moreale, E.: Analysing tutor feedback to students: first steps towards constructing an electronic monitoring system. ALT-J 1(3), 31–42 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, E., Glover, C.: Evaluating written feedback. In: Bryan, C., Clegg, K. (eds.) Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, pp. 81–91. Routledge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whitelock, D., Watt, S.: e-Assessment: how can we support tutors with their marking of electronically submitted assignments? Ad-Lib J. Continuing Liberal Adult Educ. (32), 7–9 (2007). ISSN: 1361-6323

    Google Scholar 

  13. Whitelock, D.M., Gilbert, L., Hatzipanagos, S., Watt, S., Zhang, P., Gillary, P., Recio, A.: Addressing the challenges of assessment and feedback in higher education: a collaborative effort across three UK universities. In: Proceedings of the INTED 2012, Valencia, Spain (2012). ISBN: 978-84-615-5563-5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Whitelock, D., Gilbert, L., Hatzipanagos, S., Watt, S., Zhang, P., Gillary, P. Recio, A.: Assessment for learning: supporting tutors with their feedback using an electronic system that can be used across the higher education sector. In: Proceedings 10th International Conference on Computer Based Learning in Science, CBLIS 2012, Barcelona, Spain, 26–29 June (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson, J.T.E., Alden Rivers, B., Whitelock, D.: The role of feedback in the under-attainment of ethnic minority students: evidence from distance education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 40(4), 557–573 (2014). doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.938317

  16. Van Labeke, N., Whitelock, D., Field, D., Pulman, S, Richardson, J.: OpenEssayist: extractive summarisation & formative assessment of free-text essays. In: Workshop on Discourse-Centric Learning Analytics, 3rd Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2013), Leuven, Belgium (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bird, S., Klein, E., Loper, E.: Natural Language Processing with Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Whitelock, D., Twiner, A., Richardson, J.T.E., Field, D., Pulman, S.: OpenEssayist: a supply and demand learning analytics tool for drafting academic essays. In: The 5th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) Conference, Poughkeepsie, New York, USA, 16–20 March 2015 (2015). ISBN: 978-1-4503-3417-4

    Google Scholar 

  19. Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 7–74 (1998). doi:10.1080/0969595980050102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chickering, A.W., Gamson, Z.F.: Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Am. Assoc. High. Educ. Bull. 39(7), 3–7 (2015). http://www.aahea.org/aahea/articles/sevenprinciples1987.htm. Accessed 12 May 2015

  21. Buhagiar, M.A.: Mathematics student teachers’ views on tutor feedback during teaching practice. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. iFirst Article, 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The OpenEssayist Research was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, grant numbers EP/J005959/1 & EP/J005231/1). Thanks are also due to the SAFeSEA team who produced OpenEssayist, namely John Richardson, Alison Twiner, Debora Field and Stephen Pulman. I would also like to thank Stuart Watt and the JISC for their support in the development of OpenMentor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Whitelock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Whitelock, D. (2015). Maximising Student Success with Automatic Formative Feedback for Both Teachers and Students. In: Ras, E., Joosten-ten Brinke, D. (eds) Computer Assisted Assessment. Research into E-Assessment. TEA 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 571. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27704-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27704-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27703-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27704-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics