Advertisement

Karl Löwith’s Understanding of Sociality

  • Gerhard ThonhauserEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality book series (SIPS, volume 6)

Abstract

This paper discusses Karl Löwith’s as yet little known contribution to an understanding of human sociality and social reality. It focusses on his accounts of “social roles” and “correflexivity” in human interaction, and the intelligibility of social artifacts through their connectedness with everyday practices. According to Löwith, the intelligibility of social behavior depends to a large extent on us ascribing roles to others. This is combined with the notion of correflexivity: Human social action is not simply directed towards others, but is already co-determined by the anticipation of their response; we relate to others in such a way that the anticipation of their potential relation to us, including an anticipation of their anticipation of our action, co-determines our initial relation to them. For Löwith, the understanding of others as having social roles and the correflexivity of social interaction are the basic infrastructure of human sociality. They form the background that makes others and their actions intelligible, thereby presenting them as potential partners for joint intention or action. In addition, the paper discusses Löwith’s criticism of universal ontology. He opposes any essentialist project, may it be metaphysical or naturalistic, in favor of a hermeneutic phenomenological method; such an approach fosters awareness of its own preunderstandings, opening them to critical examination and political contestation.

Keywords

Löwith Collective intentionality Social reality Social roles Correflexivity 

References

  1. Donaggio, Enrico. 2000. Zwischen Nietzsche Und Heidegger. Karl Löwiths Anthropologischer Philosophie Des Faktischen Lebens. Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie, 37–48.Google Scholar
  2. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-world. A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, Division 1. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fazio, Giorgio. 2010. Die Grenzen Der Persönlichen Beziehungen. Karl Löwiths Phänomenologie Des Indiviuums Als Mitmensch. Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie, 175–192.Google Scholar
  4. Haugeland, John. 1982. Heidegger on being a person. Noûs 16: 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time, Trans. Joan Stambaugh. Albany: SONY Press.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Comments on Karl Jasper’s psychology of worldviews (1919/21). In Pathmarks. Trans. William McNeill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Ontology – Hermeneutics of facticity. Trans. John Van Buren. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kołtan, Jacek. 2012. Der Mitmensch. Zur Identitätsproblematik Des Sozialen Selbst Ausgehend von Der Frühphilosophie Martin Heideggers Und Karl Löwiths. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A philosophical study. Oxford: Blackburn.Google Scholar
  10. Löwith, Karl. 1930a. Grundzüge Der Entwickelung Der Phänomenologie Zur Philosophie Und Ihr Verhältnis Zur Protestantischen Theologie. Theologische Rundschau 2(26–64): 333–361.Google Scholar
  11. Löwith, Karl. 1930b. Phänomenologische Ontologie Und Protestantische Theologie. Zeitschrift Für Theologie Und Kirche 38: 365–399.Google Scholar
  12. Löwith, Karl. 1949. Meaning in history: The theological implications of the philosophy of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Löwith, Karl. 1964. From Hegel to Nietzsche. The revolution in nineteenth-century thought. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Löwith, Karl. 1981a. Das Individuum in Der Rolle Des Mitmenschen. In Sämtliche Schriften, vol. 1, 9–197. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  15. Löwith, Karl. 1981b. Sämtliche Schriften. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  16. Mehring, Reinhard. 2003. Heidegger Und Karl Löwith. Destruktion Einer Überlieferungskritik. In Heidegger-Handbuch. Leben-Werk-Wirkung, ed. Dieter Thomä, 373–375. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  17. Ratcliffe, Matthew. 2005. The feeling of being. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12(8–10): 45–63.Google Scholar
  18. Ratcliffe, Matthew. 2008. Feelings of being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Riedel, Manfred. 2007. Der Doppelblick Des Exilanten: Karl Löwith, Martin Heidegger Und Die Deutschen. In Hannah Arendt: Verborgene Tradition. Unzeitgemäße Aktualität, ed. Stefanie Rosenmüller, 123–143. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
  20. Scheler, Max. 1973. Wesen Und Formen Der Sympathie. 6., durchges. Aufl. Gesammelte Werke 7. Bern, München: Francke.Google Scholar
  21. Schloßberger, Matthias. 2005. Die Erfahrung Des Anderen. Gefühle Im Menschlichen Miteinander. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmid, H.B. 2009. Plural action, Contributions to phenomenology, vol. 60, 11th ed. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Searle, John. 2002. Collective intentions and actions. In Consciousness and language, 90–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Theunissen, Michael. 1965. Der Andere. Studien Zur Sozialontologie Der Gegenwart. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
  25. Vendrell Ferran, Ingrid. 2008. Die Emotionen. Gefühle in Der Realistischen Phänomenologie. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ViennaWienAustria

Personalised recommendations