Advertisement

Czesław Znamierowski’s Social Ontology and Its Phenomenological Roots

  • Giuseppe Lorini
  • Wojciech ŻełaniecEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality book series (SIPS, volume 6)

Abstract

The Polish philosopher Czesław Znamierowski (1888–1967) was perhaps not a pur sang phenomenologist; however, he was significantly inspired and influenced by Reinach’s A priori foundations of the civil law. In 1921, a few years before Gerda Walther, Edith Stein and Dietrich von Hildebrand, he started publishing articles and books on what he called “social ontology.” The social ontology which emerges from these writings, and which we sketch out in our essay, is remarkably similar to, and yet no less strikingly different from, the social ontologies of these phenomenological classics, the latter no doubt due to Znamierowski’s at times not quite accurate criticism of Reinach, but even more due to Znamierowski’s own acumen and unconfessedly phenomenological insightfulness. We explain his conceptual apparatus, his “social acts” and “social facts”, his “social bearing” and “social function”, and the rest of it; we also amply illustrate this with examples provided by Znamierowski himself and by ourselves. We try to show that Znamierowski in virtue of his method, the substance of his thought, and also his style, and not just in virtue of the influences he had absorbed, was a de facto phenomenologist, even though he did not call himself such. Last but not least, we attempt to demonstrate that Znamierowski’s social ontology is by and large correct and can be put to fruitful use even today, rather than be of merely historical interest.

Keywords

Social fact Social bearing Social function Social ontology Reinach 

References

  1. Brentano, Franz. 1995. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Ed. Oskar Kraus, and Linda L. McAlister. Trans. Antos C. Rancurello, D.B. Terrell, and Linda McAlister. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Calvino, Italo. 1959. Il cavaliere inesistente. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
  3. Czepita, Stanisław. 1999. Czesław Znamierowski’s concept of constitutive rules. Ratio Juris 3: 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gidyński, Joseph C. 1968. Czesław Znamierowski: A realistic theoretician of law. The Polish Review 13(4): 45–51.Google Scholar
  5. Gilbert, Margaret. 1989. On social facts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Gittler, Joseph B. 1950. Social ontology and the criteria for definitions in sociology. The Midwest Sociologist 13(1): 8.Google Scholar
  7. Groarke, Louis. 2009. An Aristotelian account of induction: Creating something from nothing. Montreal/Kingston/London/Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
  8. Habermas, Jürgen. 1984–1987. The theory of communicative action. Vol. I: Reason and the rationalization of society. Vol. II: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Loddo, Olimpia. 2011. Percezione e recezione dell’atto giuridico in Adolf Reinach e Ernst Zitelmann. In Eidetica del diritto e ontologia sociale. Il realismo di Adolf Reinach/Eidetics of law and social ontology. Adolf Reinach, the realist, ed. Francesca De Vecchi, 245–260. Milano: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  10. Lorini, Giuseppe. 2000. Dimensioni giuridiche dell’istituzionale. Padova: CEDAM.Google Scholar
  11. Lorini, Giuseppe. 2010. La costitutività dei Mixed Modes in John Locke. In Sergio Cotta (1920–2007). Studi in memoria, ed. Bruno Romano, 519–542. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
  12. Lorini, Giuseppe. 2011. Norma nuda. Un concetto ipotetico. In Scritti in onore di Franco Modugno, vol. 3, 1969–1976. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.Google Scholar
  13. Lorini, Giuseppe, and Żełaniec, Wojciech. 2013. And yet there was some: Czesław Znamierowski’s social ontology. In The nature of social reality, ed. E. Fadda, R. Giovagnoli, A. Givigliano, and C. Stancati, 182–197. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Lorini, Giuseppe, and Żełaniec, Wojciech. (Forthcoming). Czesław Znamierowski: From social ontology to legal realism. In Legal philosophy in the 20th century: The civil law world. A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence, vol. 12, t. 2, ed. Enrico Pattaro, and Corrado Roversi. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Moody, Ernest A. 1975. Studies in medieval philosophy, science and logic: Collected papers 1933–1969. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pearson, Karl. 1892. The grammar of science. London: Walter Scott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Recaséns Siches, Luis. 1966. La sociologia del diritto nella Spagna, nel Portogallo e nell’America Latina. In La sociologia del diritto. Problemi e ricerche, ed. Renato Treves, 215–232. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità.Google Scholar
  18. Reinach, Adolf. 1905. Über den Ursachenbegriff im geltenden Strafrecht. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  19. Reinach, Adolf. 1983. The a priori foundations of civil law. Aletheia 3: 1–142.Google Scholar
  20. Reinach, Adolf. 2009. On the concept of causality in the criminal law. Libertarian Papers 1(35): 1–40.Google Scholar
  21. Salice, Alessandro. 2013. Social ontology as embedded in the tradition of phenomenological realism. In The background of social reality, ed. Michael Schmitz, Beatrice Kobow, and Hans Bernhard Schmid, 217–232. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Searle, John. 2010. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skórski, Aleksander. 1893. Filozofia jako nauka akademicka. Lwów: Księgarnia Gubrynowicza i Schmidta.Google Scholar
  24. Smolak, Marek. 2007. Czesław Znamierowski. W poszukiwaniu sprawnego państwa. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.Google Scholar
  25. Theunissen, Michael. 1965. Der Andere. Studien zur Sozialontologie der Gegenwart. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  26. Traiger, Saul. 1985. Hume on finding an impression of the self. Hume Studies 11: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Twardowski, Kazimierz. 1999. Actions and products. In On actions, products and other topics in philosophy, ed. Johannes Brandl and Jan Woleński, 103–132. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, Robert R. 1997. Hegel’s ethics of recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, Paul. 2013. The reflexive nature of awareness: A Tibetan madhyamaka defence. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Woleński, Jan. 1989. Logic and philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw school. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Żełaniec, Wojciech. 2003. Die Würde des Menschen. Ein kurzer bescheidener Vorschlag. In Menschenwürde – Annäherung an einen Begriff, ed. R. Stoecker, 193–200. Wien: öbv & hpt.Google Scholar
  32. Żełaniec, Wojciech. 2013. Create to rule: Studies on constitutive rules. Milano: Lettere Economia Diritto.Google Scholar
  33. Ziembiński, Zygmunt. 1976. Practical logic. Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Znamierowski, Czesław. 1912. Der Wahrheitsbegriff im Pragmatismus. Warschau: Buchdruckerei von St. Niemira’s Söhnen.Google Scholar
  35. Znamierowski, Czesław. 1915. Metafizyka społeczności. Przegląd filozoficzny 18: 271–304.Google Scholar
  36. Znamierowski, Czesław. 1921. O przedmiocie i fakcie społecznym. Przegląd Filozoficzny 24: 1–34.Google Scholar
  37. Znamierowski, Czesław. 1924. Podstawowe pojęcia teorji prawa. Część I. Układ prawny i norma prawna. Poznań: Fiszer i Majewski.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawCagliari UniversityCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Sociology and JournalismGdańsk UniversityGdańskPoland

Personalised recommendations