Advertisement

The Actuality of States and Other Social Groups. Tomoo Otaka’s Transcendental Project?

  • Genki UemuraEmail author
  • Toru Yaegashi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality book series (SIPS, volume 6)

Abstract

The aim of the present chapter is to bring to light and assess discussions of social reality proposed by a Japanese student of Husserl, Tomoo Otaka (1899–1956). What is most remarkable about Otaka in this regard is the fact that he conceives himself as a follower of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. This makes him unique among early phenomenologists of sociality, as most of his phenomenological contemporaries dealt with so-called social ontological problems in a realist-ontological manner. Consequently, the following question guides the present paper: How and to what extent can Otaka’s discussions of social reality be integrated into Husserl’s project of transcendental phenomenology? Drawing mainly on his German and Japanese writings from the 1930s, we show not only that Otaka appropriates Husserl’s idea of constitutive analysis but also that he attempts to expand it; he applies Husserl’s scheme of constitutive analysis to actually existing states, such as Japan, and other social groups. At the same time, we point out that Otaka’s work faces a dilemma. On the one hand, if he sticks to the project of constitutive analysis, his account of the actuality of social groups is implausible, because it relies on the problematic idea that we can have supersensible intuition of those groups. On the other hand, if he removes the implausible portion of his analysis, it would make his position non-phenomenological according to his own Husserlian standards. This dilemma, we further argue, could have been avoided, if he adopts an alternative, but still Husserlian scheme of constitutive analysis.

Keywords

Tomoo Otaka Edmund Husserl Social groups Transcendental phenomenology Constitutive analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to the editors of the present volume, Hans Bernhard Schmid and Alessandro Salice. Without their kind invitation, there would have been no social relations among the authors that found the actuality of our “Otaka Research Group.” Our thanks go also to Satoshi Narihara for joining our group; to Wolfgang Ertl for helping us translate German passages into English; to the anonymous reviewer of the present chapter for his/her insightful comments and suggestions; and, last but not the least, to Tim Burns for his fine proofreading that has saved us from a lot of mistakes. Both of the authors are supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

References

  1. Carr, D. 1999. The paradox of subjectivity. Self in the transcendental tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Crowell, S.G. 2001. Husserl, Heidegger and the space of meaning. A path toward transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwester University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, B.W. 2010. The Kyoto school. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition). E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/kyoto-school/
  4. Heidegger, M. 2001. Sein und Zeit, 18th ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. J. MacQuarrie, and E. Robinson. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  6. Higuchi, Y. 1990. The constitution and emperor system: Is revisionism alive? Law and Contemporary Problems 53/1: 51–60.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, E. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Zweites Buch. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. In Husserliana, ed. M. Biemel, vol. IV. Den Haag: Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. 1971. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Drittes Buch. Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Fundamente der Wissenschaften. In Husserliana, ed. M. Biemel, vol. V. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, E. 1976a. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. In Husserliana, ed. K. Schuhmann, vol. III/1. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, E. 1976b. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. In Husserliana, ed. W. Biemel, vol. VI. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, E. 1983. Ideas partaining to a pure phenomenology and a phenomenological philosophy. First book. General introduction to a pure phenomenology. Trans. F. Kersten. The Hague/Boston/Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, E. 1984. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In Husserliana, ed. U. Panzer, vol. XIX/1–2. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, E. 1987. Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911–1921). In Husserliana, eds. T. Nenon, and H. R. Sepp, vol. XXV. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, E. 1994. Briefwechsel. In Husserliana Dokmente III/1–10, eds. K. Schuhmann, and E. Schuhmann. Dordrecht: Kluewr Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Ishikawa, K. 2006. Cosmos. Keijô Gakuha Kôhô-gaku no Kôbô [Cosmos. A trace of the Keijô School of Public Law]. In Teikoku Nippon no Gakuchi [Science in the Japanese Empire], ed. T. Sakai, vol. 1. Tokyo: Iwanami Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Jellinek, G. 1914. Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3rd ed. Berlin: O. Häring.Google Scholar
  17. Kelsen, H. 1925. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, C. 2013. Odaka Tomoo to Shokumin-chi Chôsen [Tomoo Otaka and Chosun as a Colony]. In Empire and higher education in East Asia, ed. T. Sakai and T. Matsuda, 61–71. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Koellreutter, O. 1933. Grundriß der allgemeinen Staatslehre. Tübingen: J. C. Mohr.Google Scholar
  20. Loidolt, S. 2010. Einführung in die Rechtsphänomenologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  21. Melle, U. 1997. Husserl’s phenomenology of willing. In Phenomenology of values and valuing, ed. J.G. Hart and L. Embree, 169–192. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulligan, K. 2001. Phenomenology: Philosophical aspects. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, ed. N.J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, 11363–11369. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Otaka, T. 1932. Grundledung der Lehre vom sozialen Verband. Wien: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Otaka, T. 1933. Genshô-gaku to Hôritsu-gaku [Phenomenology and jurisprudence]. Reprinted in his Hôritsu no Shakai-teki Kôzô [The social structure of laws]. Tokyo: Keisô Shobô, 1957.Google Scholar
  25. Otaka, T. 1935. Hô-Tetsugaku [Philsophy of law]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyôron ShaGoogle Scholar
  26. Otaka, T. 1936. Kokka-Kôzô Ron [On the theory of the structure of states]. Tokyo, Iwanami Publisher. (Cited from the 2nd edition in 1948 from the same publisher. No alteration is made on the main text of this edition, but the preface to the first edition is replaced with the new one.)Google Scholar
  27. Otaka, T. 1948. Hô-Tetsugaku ni okeru Keiken-shugi to Keijijô-gaku [Empiricism and metaphysics in philosophy of law]. Hô-Tetsugaku Shiki-hô [Philosophy of Law Quarterly] 1: 90–113.Google Scholar
  28. Otaka, T. 1952. Jiyû-Ron [On liberty]. Tokyo: Keisô Shobô.Google Scholar
  29. Otaka, T. 1960. Genshô-gaku ha no Hô-Tetsugaku [Philosophy of law in the phenomenological school]. In Hô-Tetsugaku Koza [A companion to philosophy of law], eds. T. Otaka et al, vol. 5. Tokyo: Yûhikaku.Google Scholar
  30. Pfänder, A. 1922. Zur Psychologie der Gesinnungen. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  31. Reinach, A. 1913. Die apriorische Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechtes. In his Sämtliche Werke, eds. K. Schuhmann, and B. Smith. München: Philosophia Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
  32. Scheler, M. 1923. Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. In Gesammelte Werke, vol. 7, ed. M. Frings. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
  33. Schmitt, C. 1928. Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  34. Schutz, A. 1996. Collected papers, vol. IV. eds. H. Wagner, G. Psathas, and F. Kersten. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  35. Tönnies, F. 1926. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Berlin: Karl Curtius.Google Scholar
  36. Uemura, G. 2015. Husserl’s conception of cognition as an action. An inquiry into its prehistory. In Feeling and value, willing and action, eds. M. Ubiali, and M. Wehlre, 119–137. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Usui, J. 1984. Ryûgaku Jidai no Omoide [A Memoir of My Study Abroad]. Tetsugaku Kenkyu [Phiosophical Study] 550: 609–617.Google Scholar
  38. Wagner, H. 1983. Alfred Schutz: An intellectual biography. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Walther, G. 1923. Ein Beitrag zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of HumanitiesRissho UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Center for Research and Development of Higher EducationUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations