Advertisement

Disenchanting the Fact/Value Dichotomy: A Critique of Felix Kaufmann’s Views on Value and Social Reality

  • Sonja Rinofner-KreidlEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality book series (SIPS, volume 6)

Abstract

What is at stake in philosophical debates on values is whether it is possible to accurately describe our moral, aesthetic, religious or otherwise evaluative experiences without entering an ontological commitment to values as independently existing objects that cannot be reduced to physical objects. As far as values emerge in Felix Kaufmann’s work this venerable debate is reduced to the question of how social scientists should deal with the fact/value dichotomy. The present essay aims at elaborating and challenging Kaufmann’s thoughts on values and their impact on his understanding of social reality. In order to approach this aim I introduce two methodological issues, called strata of experience and the philosopher’s fallacy, which offer a suitable framework for inquiring into Kaufmann’s Methodenlehre (1936), his Methodology (1944) and other relevant materials.

In accordance with his positivist leanings, Kaufmann maintains that any legitimate concern for values must restrict itself to analyzing value judgments as part of a scientific methodology. Contrary to this, I argue that subverting and bypassing descriptions of everyday evaluative (e.g. moral) experiences, including fine-grained analyses of their intentional structure, represents a serious deficiency of Kaufmann’s approach. The latter is brought to light by presenting Husserl’s phenomenological investigation of evaluative experiences which neither complies with the narrow range of a purely scientific treatment nor embarks on the opposite extreme of value Platonism. It is this rigid opposition that lurks behind Kaufmann’s relegation of values into the sphere of irrationality. Having contrasted Kaufmann’s and Husserl’s value inquiries, I conclude by taking stock of their implications. In doing so, I, first, try to figure out their overall understanding of social reality. Secondly, I ponder their presumable responses to current debates on entangling or disentangling views with regard to the fact/value dichotomy.

Keywords

Value Methodology (of social sciences) Phenomenology Strata of experience Fact/value dichotomy 

References

  1. Acham, Karl. (Hg.). 2004. Geschichte der Österreichischen Humanwissenschaften, Bd. 6, Teil 1: Philosophie und Religion: Erleben, Wissen, Erkennen. Wien: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Bernet, Rudolf, Donn Welton, and Gina Zavota (eds.). 2005. Husserl: Critical essays Vol. V: Horizons: Lifeworld, ethics, history, and metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Crowell, Steven. 2002. Kantianism and phenomenology. In Drummond & Embree, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
  4. Crowell, Steven. 2007. Phenomenology and the first-person character of philosophical knowledge. The Modern Schoolman LXXXIV(January & March): 131–148.Google Scholar
  5. Dahms, Hans-Joachim. 1985. Philosophie, Wissenschaft, Aufklärung. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Wirkung des Wiener Kreises. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Därmann, Iris. (Hg.). 2014. Kraft der Dinge. Phänomenologische Skizzen. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
  7. Drummond, J. 1995. Moral objectivity: Husserl’s sentiments of the understanding. Husserl-Studies 12(Spring): 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drummond, John J. 2006. Respect as a moral emotion: A phenomenological approach. Husserl Studies 22: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drummond, John, and Lester Embree (eds.). 2002. Phenomenological approaches to moral philosophy. A handbook. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Fuchs, Thomas, Thiemo Breyer, and Christoph Mundt (eds.). 2014. Karl Jaspers’s philosophy and psychopathology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, Margaret. 2000. Sociality and responsibility. New essays in plural subject theory. Lanham et al.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Hartmann, Nicolai. 1962. Ethics. Volume Three: Moral freedom. Trans. Stanton Coit, introduction by J. H. Muirhead. Third edition London/New York: George Allen & Unwin/The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  13. Hartmann, Nicolai. 1963. Ethics. Volume two: Moral values. Trans. Stanton Coit, introduction by J. H. Muirhead. Third edition London/New York: George Allen & Unwin/The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  14. Hartmann, Nicolai. 1967. Ethics. Volume one: Moral phenomena. Trans. Stanton Coit, introduction by J. H. Muirhead. Third edition London/New York: George Allen & Unwin/The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  15. Helling, Ingeborg K. 1984. A. Schutz and F. Kaufmann: Sociology between science and interpretation. Human Studies. A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences 7: 141–161.Google Scholar
  16. Helling, Ingeborg K. 1985. Logischer Positivismus und Phänomenologie: Felix Kaufmanns Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. In Dahms, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
  17. Hödl, Josef, Klaus Posch, and Peter Wilhelmer (Hg.) 2007. Sprache und Gesellschaft. Gedenkschrift für Hans Georg Zilian. Wien: Verlag Österreich.Google Scholar
  18. Hudson, W. D. (ed.). 1969. The is-ought question. A collection of papers on the central problem in moral philosophy. London: MacMillan St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  19. Huemer, Wolfgang. 2003. Empiricism and phenomenology: Felix Kaufmann. In Stadler, pp. 151–161.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Experience and judgment. Investigations in a genealogy of logic. Revised and edited by Ludwig Landgrebe, Trans. James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks, introduction by James S. Churchill, afterword by Lothar Eley. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Husserl, Edmund. 1983. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. Trans. Fred Kersten. The Hague/Boston/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Husserl, Edmund. 1988. Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre 1908–1914. hg. von U. Melle. Dordrecht/Boston/London (= Husserliana XXVIII).Google Scholar
  23. Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical investigations. Trans. J. N. Findlay from the Second German edition of Logische Untersuchungen, ed. Dermot Moran, vol. II [Investigations III, IV, V, VI]. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Husserl, Edmund. 2004. Einleitung in die Ethik: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1920/1924, ed. H. Peucker. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers (Husserliana XXXVII).Google Scholar
  25. Husserl, Edmund. 2008. Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937), ed. Rochus Sowa. Dordrecht: Springer (Husserliana XXXIX).Google Scholar
  26. Kaufmann, Felix. 1924. Kant und die reine Rechtslehre. Kant-Studien 29: 233–242.Google Scholar
  27. Kaufmann, Felix. 1929. Die philosophischen Grundprobleme der Lehre von der Strafrechtsschuld. Leipzig und Wien: Deuticke.Google Scholar
  28. Kaufmann, Felix. 1930. Soziale Kollektiva. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie I: 294–308.Google Scholar
  29. Kaufmann, Felix. 1935. Remarks on methodology of the social sciences. The Sociological Review XXVII: 64–84 [= Kraus Reprint 1975].Google Scholar
  30. Kaufmann, Felix. 1936a. Methodenlehre der Sozialwissenschaften. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Kaufmann, Felix. 1936b. Die Bedeutung der logischen Analyse für die Sozialwissenschaften. In Actes du Huitième Congrès International de Philosophie à Prague, 2–7 September 1934, Prag, pp. 209–216.Google Scholar
  32. Kaufmann, Felix. 1940. Strata of experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1: 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaufmann, Felix. 1944. Methodology of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kaufmann, Felix. 1945/1946. On the nature of inductive inference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6: 602–609.Google Scholar
  35. Kaufmann, Felix. 1949. The issue of ethical neutrality in political science. Social Research 16: 344–352.Google Scholar
  36. Kaufmann, Felix. 1966. Die Kriterien des Rechts. Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der juristischen Methodenlehre (Neudruck der Ausgabe Tübingen 1924). Scientia Verlag Aalen.Google Scholar
  37. List, Christian, and Philip Petit. 2011. Group agency. The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mackie, J.L. 1977. Ethics. Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Nasu, Hishashi, Lester Embree, George Psathas, and Ilja Srubar (eds.). 2009. Alfred Schutz and his intellectual partners. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  40. O’Neill, John (ed.). 1973. Modes of individualism and collectivism. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  41. Pettit, Philip. 1993. The common mind. An essay on psychology, society, and politics. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Putnam, Hilary. 2002. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Quine, Willard v. O. 1948/1949. On what there is. Review of Metaphysics 2:21–38.Google Scholar
  44. Quine, Willard v. O. 1992. Semantic ascent. In Rorty, pp. 168–171.Google Scholar
  45. Reeder, Harry P. 1991. The work of Felix Kaufmann. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  46. Reeder, Harry P. 2009. Alfred Schutz and Felix Kaufmann: The Methodologist’s Brackets. In Nasu, Embree, Psathas & Srubar, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
  47. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2000. Edmund Husserl. Zeitlichkeit und Intentionalität. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2003. Mediane Phänomenologie. Subjektivität im Spannungsfeld von Naturalität und Kulturalität. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  49. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2004. Von der Metaphilosophie zur Methodologie: Heinrich Gomperz, Franz Kröner, Felix Kaufmann. In Acham, pp. 163–208.Google Scholar
  50. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2007. Apriorisierung des Erfahrungsgegenstandes. Zur wissenschaftlichen Transformation der natürlichen Erfahrung. In Hödl, Posch & Wilhelmer, pp. 43–73.Google Scholar
  51. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2009. Scham und Schuld. Zur Phänomenologie selbstbezüglicher Gefühle. Phänomenologische Forschungen, pp. 137–173.Google Scholar
  52. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2010. Husserl’s categorical imperative and his related critique of Kant. In Vandevelde & Luft, pp. 188–210.Google Scholar
  53. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2013. Husserls Fundierungsmodell als Grundlage einer intentionalen Wertungsanalyse. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 1(2): 59–82.Google Scholar
  54. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2014a. Phenomenological intuitionism and its psychiatric impact. In Fuchs, Breyer & Mundt, 33–60.Google Scholar
  55. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2014b. Gebrauchsdinge und wissenschaftliche Gegenstände, phänomenologische Wertungsanalyse und Wertfreiheitsthese. Därmann, 193–208.Google Scholar
  56. Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja. 2015. Mereological Foundation vs. Supervenience? A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi’s Ethical Intuitionism. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 3(2): 81–124.Google Scholar
  57. Rorty, Richard M. (ed.). 1992. The linguistic turn. Essays in philosophical method. With two retrospective essays. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Scheler, Max. 1973. Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values. A new attempt toward the foundation of an ethical personalism. Trans. Manfred S. Frings and Roger L. Funk. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schmid, Hans Bernhard, and David P. Schweikard (eds.). 2009. Kollektive Intentionalität. Eine Debatte über die Grundlagen des Sozialen. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  60. Searle, John. 2010. Making the social world. The structure of human civilization. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stadler, Friedrich (ed.). 1997. Phänomenologie und logischer Empirismus. Zentenarium Felix Kaufmann. Wien/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Stadler, Friedrich (ed.). 2003. The Vienna circle and logical empiricism. Re-evaluation and future perspectives. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Vandevelde, Pol, and Sebastian Luft (eds.). 2010. Phenomenology, archeology, ethics: Current investigations of Husserl’s corpus. London/New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  64. Zilian, Hans-Georg. 1990. Klarheit und Methode: Felix Kaufmanns Wissenschaftstheorie. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations