Advertisement

Capacity Building of Early Career Researchers Through Cross-Institutional Mentoring

  • Angela Fenton
  • Kerryann Walsh
  • Amy MacDonaldEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Most early career researchers in the first five years following doctoral qualification are faced with research challenges and opportunities, which necessitate the ability to navigate and overcome barriers, and to identify and benefit from possibilities. In this chapter, the authors outline an intentional mentoring initiative aimed at building the capacity of early career researchers within the Excellence in Research in Early Years Education Collaborative Research Network (CRN) in Australia. The initiative involved partnering early career researchers with experienced researchers and the inclusion of an early career representative on the network planning committee. The chapter discusses the many benefits for the mentee arising from the initiative including increased publication, momentum and confidence, as well as exposure to new methodologies, theoretical frameworks, and productive collaborative partnerships. It is hoped, however, that the findings will be of relevance to similar and diverse (funded/unfunded) research programs and collaborative networks wherever mentoring is applied as a capacity building strategy to assist researchers.

Keywords

Higher education Mentoring Early career researchers Networks 

References

  1. Ansmann, L., Flickinger, T., Barello, S., Kunneman, L., Mantwill, S., Quilligan, S., et al. (2014). Career development for early career academics: Benefits of networking and the role of professional societies. Patient Education and Counseling, 97(1), 132–134. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, J. (1994). The Qualitative Report, 2 (1), 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/
  3. Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining ‘early career’ in research. Higher Education, 45(3), 257–279. doi: 10.1023/A:1022698529612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazeley, P., Kemp, L., Stevens, K., Asmar, C., Grbich, C., Marsh, H., et al. (1996). Waiting in the wings: A study of early career academic researchers in Australia, (National Board of Employment Education and Training Commissioned Report No. 50). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, R. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Sydney, NSW, Australia: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Carmargo, A., & Simpson, A. (2003). Collaborative research networks work. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 112(4), 468–471. doi: 10.1172/JC1200319520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles Sturt University. (2015). CRN: Excellence in research in early years. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/ripple/crn/home
  8. Clancy, C., Margolis, P., & Miller, M. (2013). Collaborative networks for both improvement and research. Pediatrics, 131(4), S210–S214. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claussen, J., Grohsjean, T., Luger, J., & Probst, G. (2013). Talent management and career development: What it takes to get promoted. Journal of World Business., 49(2), 236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coghlan, D. (2001). Insider action research projects. Implications for practising managers. Management Learning, 21(1), 49–60. doi: 10.1177/135050760132100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Commonwealth of Australia. (2013). Collaborative Research Networks. Retrieved from http://education.gov.au/collaborative-research-networks-crn
  12. Cox, M. (2013). The impact of communities of practice in support of early-career academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 18–30. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.599600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, M. D., MacKenzie, J., & Prichard, J. (2006, May). Learning communities to foster and support SoTL development: Recent results from the US and UK. Paper presented at the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) 6th Annual International Conference, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  14. Cumming, J. (2010). Renewing the academic and research workforce in education: Challenges and opportunities. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Council of Deans of Education.Google Scholar
  15. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Dimitrova, D., & Koku, E. (2010). Managing collaborative research networks: The dual life of a virtual community of practice. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2(4), 1–22. doi: 10.4018/jvcsn.2010100101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ensher, E., Thomas, C., & Murphy, S. (2001). Comparison of traditional, step-ahead, and peer mentoring on protégés’ support, satisfaction, and perceptions of career success: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(3), 420–438. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25092732
  18. Eraut, M. (2006). Developing professional knowledge and competence. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Frost, M., & Crockett, J. (2007). Communities of practice, clusters or networks? Prospects for collaborative business arrangements in the mining and engineering sector, central western New South Wales. In P. Basu, G. O’Neill, & A. Travaglione (Eds.), Engagement and change: Exploring management, economic and finance implications of a globalising environment (pp. 249–260). Brisbane, Qld: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Grbich, C. (1998). The academic researcher: Socialisation in settings previously dominated by teaching. Higher Education, 36(1), 67–85. doi: 10.1023/A:1003104311001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hemmings, B., Smith, E., & Rushbrook, P. (2004). Factors differentiating between those academics who do and who do not publish refereed works. Issues in Educational Research, 14(2), 156–166. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier14/hemmings.html
  22. Hewitt, A., Yazar, S., & Franchina, M. (2012, July). Explosion of ophthalmic collaborative research networks in Australia [Letter to the editor]. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 41(3), 310–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02876.x
  23. Howell, J. (2014). Teaching and learning: Building effective pedagogies. Oxford: South Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
  24. Hunt, D., & Michael, C. (1983). Mentorship, a career training and development tool. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 475–485. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1983.4284603 Google Scholar
  25. Janasz, S., & Sullivan, S. (2001). Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professorial network. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 64(2), 263–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2002.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, A. (2011). Charting a course for a successful research career: A guide for early career researchers (2nd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2013, January 21). Embracing emergence: How collective impact addresses complexity. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/collective_impact
  28. Keller, T., Collier, P., Blakeslee, J., Logan, K., McCracken, K., & Morris, C. (2014). Early career mentoring for translational researchers: Mentee perspectives on challenges and issues. Teaching and Learning in Medicine: An International Journal, 26(3), 211–216. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.883983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kram, K., & Isabella, L. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110–132. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256064
  30. Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia: Pearson.Google Scholar
  31. Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2007). From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers. Higher Education, 55(3), 387–406. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liao, C. (2011). How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 86(3), 747–761. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mac Naughton, G., & Hughes, P. (2008). Doing action research in early childhood studies. Maidenhead, BRK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mann, K., Moyle, K., Reupert, A., Wilkinson, J., & Woolley, G. (2007). When two universities meet: Fostering research capacity among early career researchers. In Jeffery, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Focus Conference, 2007. Canberra, ACT. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2007/man0713x.pdf
  35. Nile, R. (2006, April 26). Passing the baton. The Australian, p. 29.Google Scholar
  36. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Queensland University of Technology. (2015). Staff profile. Retrieved from http://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/xxx
  38. Ragins, B., Cotton J., & Miller, J. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 1177–1194. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1556344
  39. Remmik, M., Karm, M., Haamer, A., & Lepp, L. (2011). Early-career academics’ learning in academic communities. International Journal for Academic Development., 16(3), 187–199. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.596702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rigby, J., & Edler, J. (2005). Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy, 34(6), 784–794. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rolin, K. (2009). Standpoint theory as a methodology for the study of power relations. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 24(2), 218–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01070.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Shimizu, H., & Hirao, T. (2009). Inter-organizational collaborative research networks in semiconductor lasers 1975–1994. The Social Science Journal, 46(2), 233–251. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2009.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, A. (2004). Never mind the width, feel the quality: The quality and impact of VET research in Australia. Research in Post-compulsory Education, 9(2), 203–215.Google Scholar
  45. Sorcinelli, M., & Yun, J. (2007). From mentor to mentoring networks: Mentoring in the new academy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(6), 58–61. doi: 10.3200/CHNG.39.6.58-C4
  46. Wallace, J. (2001). The benefits of mentoring for female lawyers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 366–391. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2000.1766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  49. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Early ChildhoodQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations