Student Co-mentoring in Israeli and American Universities: Promoting Mutual Academic Success

  • Aram AyalonEmail author


This chapter describes a peer mentoring approach that was incorporated in two courses that were at the beginning and at the end stages of students’ higher education programs: Undergraduate freshmen and doctoral students. With the goal of providing students with academic and social support using student-to-student co-mentoring experiences, the students were divided into dyads or triads. The students were asked to function both as mentors and mentees throughout an academic semester with the purpose of engaging them in co-mentoring to better meet the challenges faced, either in transitioning from high school to college or in furthering the advancement in their doctoral programs. Students enjoyed the meaningful help received and given as co-mentors and found this opportunity fulfilling. The results suggest that effective mentors not necessarily need to be more experienced or more knowledgeable than their mentees as the research suggests, but a more important aspect of effective mentoring might be providing the opportunity for persons to help others, especially those who are in similar predicaments.


Mentoring Student co-mentoring Graduate Undergraduate 


  1. Allen, T. D., Russell, J. A., & Maetzke, S. (1997). Formal peer mentoring: Factors related to protégés’ satisfaction and willingness to mentor others. Group and Organization Management, 22, 488–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamett, J. E. (2008). Mentoring, boundaries, and multiple relationships: Opportunities and challenges. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Budge, S. (2006). Peer mentoring in post-secondary education: implications for research and practice. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2007). Toward a useful theory of mentoring: A conceptual analysis and critique. Administration and Society, 39(6), 719–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). (2010). Ph.D. Completion Project: Policies and Practices to Promote Student Success . Retrieved April 29, 2015, from
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Erickson, D. E., & Travick-Jackson, C. (2006). Creating community through mentoring. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 2, 262–270.Google Scholar
  10. Hadjioannou, X., Shelton, N. R., Fu, D., & Dhanarattigannon, J. (2007). The road to a doctoral degree: Co-travelers through a perilous passage. College Student Journal, 41(1), 160–177.Google Scholar
  11. Jarvis, P. (2001). Journal writing in higher education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kram, K. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luna, G., & Cullen, D. (1998). Do graduate students need mentoring? College Student Journal, 32(3), 322–330.Google Scholar
  14. Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Mullen, C. A., Fish, V. L., & Huntinger, J. L. (2010). Mentoring doctoral students through scholastic engagement: adult learning principles in action. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(2), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. National Center for Education Statistics (2014). Institutional Retention and Graduation Rates for Undergraduate Students. Retrieved May 3, 2015 from
  17. Petosa, R. L., & Smith, L. H. (2014). Peer mentoring for health behavior change: A systematic review. American Journal of Health Education, 45(6), 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smallwood, S. (2006). Driven by foreign students, doctoral degrees are up 2.9 % in 2005. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(15), A12.Google Scholar
  19. Sultana, R. G. (1991). Research in teaching and teacher education: qualitative methods and grounded theory methodology. The South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 19(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Terrion, J. L., & Leonard, D. (2007). A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: findings from a literature review. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15(2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Terrion, J. L. (2012). Student peer mentors as a navigational resource in higher education. In C. A. Mullen, & Fletcher, S.J (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education (pp. 383–395). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Tinto, V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167–177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and Professional StudiesCentral Connecticut State UniversityNew BritainUSA

Personalised recommendations