Skip to main content

Synthetic Mesh: Making Educated Choices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The choice of mesh for hernia repair is a very complex issue. There are hundreds of options of mesh clinically available. Since hernia mesh has grown to become an approximately $1 Billion market, there are too many choices to know what would be best for which patient and what technique. Mesh is currently used based on surgeon preference less and less and based on hospital contracting more and more. However, mostly missing in the choice of mesh is the patient preference and the actual value provided to various patient groups and techniques. Measuring the value of the care provided and the value of devices and drugs used during the care process will be a necessary component of the shift from volume to value for health care in the twenty-first century. This chapter will present synthetic mesh options available for hernia repair and some perspectives about how to choose between these options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle Jr LLD. Use of Marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias. Am Surg. 1958;24:969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157:188–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; CD002197.

    Google Scholar 

  4. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2002;235:322–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg. 2000;87:854–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown CN, Finch JG. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:272–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Klinge U, Binnebosel M, Mertens PR. Are collagens the culprits in the development of incisional and inguinal hernia disease? Hernia. 2006;10(6):472–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, et al. Planned ventral hernia. Stagedmanagement for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg. 1994;219:643–50. discussion 651–653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jernigan TW, Fabian TC, Croce MA, et al. Staged management of giant abdominal wall defect: acute and long-term results. Ann Surg. 2003;238:349–55. discussion 355-357.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):991–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee L, Mata J, Landry T, Khwaja KA, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS. A systematic review of synthetic and biologic materials for abdominal wall reinforcement in contaminated fields. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2531–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raptis DA, Vichova B, Breza J, Skipworth J, Barker S. A comparison of woven versus nonwoven polypropylene (PP) and expanded versus condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on their intraperitoneal incorporation and adhesion formation. J Surg Res. 2011;169(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe NS, W.L. Medical device reporting for user facilities. Center for devices and radiological health. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Medwatch. http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/.

  16. Siegel E. Predictive analytics: the power to predict who will click, buy, lie, or die. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Ramshaw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mirmehdi, I., Ramshaw, B. (2016). Synthetic Mesh: Making Educated Choices. In: Novitsky, Y. (eds) Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27470-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27470-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27468-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27470-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics