Advertisement

Reconstructive Options for Small Abdominal Wall Defects

  • Parag BhanotEmail author
  • Ryan Ter Louw
Chapter

Abstract

Small fascial defects are an extremely common problem encountered by general surgeons. They are both spontaneous and iatrogenic in origin which impacts management. Small hernias also vary in location, commonly found in the umbilical and epigastric abdominal wall and at the site of previous incisions. The method of repair varies widely and includes: open approach, laparoscopic, primary closure, choice of mesh products, and methods of securing mesh and many other variables. This chapter will focus on addressing small fascial defects and specific techniques and indications for repair. Though recurrence is a major concern with all hernia repairs, preventing the conversion of small problem into a complex defect is critical.

Keywords

Small hernia Fascial defect Umbilical hernia Epigastric hernia Incisional hernia Ventral hernia 

References

  1. 1.
    Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg. 2003;237:129–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148(3):544–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Köhler G, Luketina RR, Emmanuel K. Sutured repair of primary small umbilicaland epigastric hernias: concomitant rectus diastasis is a significant risk factor for recurrence. World J Surg. 2015;39(1):121–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albino FP, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, et al. Does mesh location matter in abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review of the literature and a summary of recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1295–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arroyo A, García P, Pérez F, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg. 2001;88(10):1321–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, et al. Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study. World J Surg. 2013;37(11):2548–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, et al. Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;3.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, et al. Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(5):415–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, et al. Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(3):378–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMedstar Georgetown University HospitalWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryMedstar Georgetown University HospitalWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations