International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory

Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2015 pp 49-56 | Cite as

Identification of First Order Plants by Relay Feedback with Non-symmetrical Oscillations

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9520)

Abstract

The paper deals with the approximation of the systems with dominant first order dynamics by the Integrator Plus Dead Time (IPDT) model. They are attractive especially in control of unstable plants, where an open-loop identification may not be applied. This paper updates a previously published contribution based on analysis of the non-symmetrical oscillations with possible offset arising typically under relay control that has been improved to prevent computational errors in the case of a negligible disturbances, when the relay on and off times are nearly equal over one control period. The analytical results are followed by the experiments with several laboratory plant models. The obtained model parameters are used to tune disturbance observer based controllers to illustrate the performance of the proposed method in real applications.

Keywords

Closed loop identification Relay control First order model 

References

  1. 1.
    Astrom, K., Panagopoulos, H., Hagglund, T.: Design of PI controllers based on non-convex optimization. Automatica 34(5), 585–601 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hang, C., Astrom, K., Ho, W.: Relay auto-tuning in the presence of static load disturbance. Automatica 29(2), 563–564 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huba, M.: Constrained pole assignment control. In: Menini, L., Zaccarian, L., Abdallah, C.T. (eds.) Current Trends in Nonlinear Systems and Control, pp. 163–183. Birkhäuser, Boston (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huba, M.: Comparing 2DOF PI and predictive disturbance observer based filtered PI control. J. Process Control 23(10), 1379–1400 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huba, M.: Performance measures, performance limits and optimal PI control for the IPDT plant. J. Process Control 23(4), 500–515 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huba, M.: Performance portrait method: a new CAD tool. In: 10th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (ACE), Sheffield, UK (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huba, M., Ťapák, P.: Relay identification of IPDT plant by analyzing nonsymmetrical oscillations. In: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (eds.) EUROCAST 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6928, pp. 585–592. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huba, T., Huba, M., Ťapák, P., Bisták, P.: New thermo-optical plants for laboratory experiments. In: IFAC World Congress, Cape Town, South Africa (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, T., Gao, F.: Industrial Process Identification and Control Design: Step-test and Relay-experiment-based Methods. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, London (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, T., Gao, F.: A generalized relay identification method for time delay and non-minimum phase processes. Automatica 45(4), 1072–1079 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, T., Wang, Q.G., Huang, H.P.: A tutorial review on process identification from step or relay feedback test. J. Process Control 23(10), 1597–1623 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park, J.H., Sung, S.W., Lee, I.B.: Improved relay auto-tuning with static load disturbance. Automatica 33(4), 711–715 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shen, S.H., Wu, J.S., Yu, C.C.: Autotune identification under load disturbance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35(5), 1642–1651 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sung, S.W., Lee, J.: Relay feedback method under large static disturbances. Automatica 42(2), 353–356 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Slovak University of Technology in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations