Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for a Convoy of Three Pioneer Robots

  • F. M. Navas Matos
  • E. J. Molinos Vicente
  • A. Llamazares Llamazares
  • Manuel Ocaña Miguel
  • V. Milanés Montero
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 417)

Abstract

This paper deals with the stability analysis of a Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control system (CACC) in a convoy of vehicles, in order to solve traffic congestion. The differences between the Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and its cooperative version will be studied from the string stability point of view, highlighting the advantages of adding Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communications. The system will be tested in simulation using MATLAB/Simulink for a convoy of three vehicles and, after that, the control system will be translated to real experimentation for a convoy of three Pioneer robots.

Keywords

ACC CACC V2V String stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Comission, E: EU transport in figures. Statistical pocketbook 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ioannou, P., Chien, C.: Autonomous intelligent cruise control. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology 42(4) November 1993Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adaptive Cruise Control published by SAE International, ISBN 978-0-7680-1792-2, p. 488 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Milanes, V., Shladover, S., Spring, J., Nowakowski, C., Kawazoe, H., Nakamura, M.: Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 15(1), 296–305 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shladover, S., Su, D., Lu, X.: Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. 91st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naus, G., Vugts, R., Ploeg, J., van de Molegraft, R., Steinbuch, M.: Cooperative adaptive cruise control and design and experiments. In: American Control Conference (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yanakiev, D., Kanellakopoulos, I.: Nonlinear spacing policies for automated heavy-duty vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 47(4), 1365–1377 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sheikholeslam, S., Desoer, C.: Longitudinal control of a platoon of vehicles with no communication of lead vehicle information: A system-level study. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 42(4), 546–554 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swaroop, D., Hedrick, J., Chien, C., Ioannou, P.A.: A comparison of spacing and headway control strategy for automatically controlled vehicles. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 23(8), 597–625 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khatir, M. Davison, E.: Decentralized control of a large platoon of vehicles using nonidentical controllers. In: Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 2769–2776 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huppe, X., Lafontaine, J., Beauregard, M., Michaud, F.: Guidance and control of a platoon of vehicles adapted to changing environment conditions. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. 4, 3091–3096 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw, E., Hedrick, J.: String stability analysis for heterogeneous vehicle strings. In: Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 3118–3125 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, X., Goldsmith, A., Mahal, S., Hedrick, J.: Effects of communication delay on string stability in vehicle platoons. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Intell. Trans. Systems 15(1), 625–630 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ploeg, J., Scheepers, B., Nunen, E., van deWouw, N., Nijmeijer, H.: Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptice cruise control. In: Proc. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst.Conf., pp. 260–265 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naus, G., Ploeg, J., de Molengraft, M.V., Heemels, W., Steinbuch, M.: Design and implementation of parameterized adaptive cruise control: An explicit model predictive control approach. Control Engineering Practice 18, 882–892 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santos, H., Jr., M.M., Espinosa, F.: Adaptive self-triggered control of a remotely operated robot. Technical report, Electronics Department, University of Alcalá (Spain) and INCAS3, Assen (The Netherlands) and University of Groningen (The Netherlands) (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naus, J., Vugts, P., Ploeg, J., van de Molengraft, J., Steinbuch, M.: String-stable cacc design and experimental validation: A frequency-domain approach. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology 59(9), 4268–4279 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. M. Navas Matos
    • 1
  • E. J. Molinos Vicente
    • 1
  • A. Llamazares Llamazares
    • 1
  • Manuel Ocaña Miguel
    • 1
  • V. Milanés Montero
    • 2
  1. 1.RobeSafeUniversity of AlcaláMadridSpain
  2. 2.INRIAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations