Advertisement

Capturing the Complexity and Ambiguity of Academic Fields: Determining Consensual Definitions for Small Business Research, Entrepreneurship and Their Shared Interface

  • Andreas KuckertzEmail author
  • Christoph Mandl
Chapter
Part of the FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship book series (FGFS)

Abstract

Small business management and entrepreneurship are clearly related phenomena but certainly not synonymous. We seek to capture and disentangle this complex relationship between both fields by employing a large-scale survey of small business and entrepreneurship scholars and a content analysis of published research from both areas, from which we derive an implicit consensual definition of each field and the interface between them. Our findings suggest the presence of a relatively strong common bond within the fields that enables researchers to reflect multiple perspectives, while still maintaining each field’s distinctiveness.

Keywords

Academic field Content analysis Definition Entrepreneurship Small business 

References

  1. Anderson, A. R. (2000). Paradox in the periphery: An entrepreneurial reconstruction. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(2), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies—a comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438.Google Scholar
  3. Bolton Committee. (1971). Report of the committee of enquiry into small firms. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  4. Bort, S., & Schiller-Merkens, S. (2011). Reducing uncertainty in scholarly publishing: Concepts in the field of organization studies, 1960-2008. Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(4), 337–360.Google Scholar
  5. Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354–359.Google Scholar
  7. Cummings, S., & Daellenbach, U. (2009). A guide to the future of strategy? The history of long range planning. Long Range Planning, 42(2), 234–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  9. Curran, J. (2006). ‘Specificity’ and ‘denaturing’ the small business. International Small Business Journal, 24(2), 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curran, J., & Blackburn, R. (2001). Researching the small enterprise. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. D’Amboise, G., & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: Attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 226–240.Google Scholar
  12. Davidsson, P. (2003). The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. In J. A. Katz & D. A. Shepherd (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (pp. 315–372). London: JAL.Google Scholar
  13. Davidsson, P., & Tonelli, M. (2013). Killing our darling: Why we need to let go of the entrepreneurial opportunity construct. Paper presented at the Australia Centre for Entrepreneurship (ACE) Research Exchange Conference 2013, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (2013). Breaking new paths: theory and method in path dependence research. Schmalenbach Business Review, 65(3), 288–311.Google Scholar
  15. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. Fülbier, R. U., & Weller, M. (2011). A glance at German financial accounting research between 1950 and 2005: A publication and citation analysis. Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(1), 2–33.Google Scholar
  17. Gartner, W. B. (1989). ‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ Is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(1), 47–68.Google Scholar
  18. Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibb, A. A. (2000). SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance, mythical concepts, myths, assumptions, rituals and confusions. International Small Business Journal, 18(3), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant, P., & Perren, L. (2002). Small business and entrepreneurial research: Meta-theories, paradigms and prejudices. International Small Business Journal, 20(2), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iturralde, T., Maseda, A., & San-Jose, L. (2010). Empirical evidence of banking relationships for Spanish SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 28(3), 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Julien, P. A. (1993). Small businesses as a research subject: Some reflections on knowledge of small businesses and its effects on economic theory. Small Business Economics, 5(2), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Julien, P. A. (1997). The state of the art in small business and entrepreneurship. Brookfield, MA: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Kao, R. W. Y. (1993). Defining entrepreneurship: Past, present and? Creativity and Innovation Management, 2(1), 69–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katz, J. A. (2008). Fully mature but not fully legitimate: A different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 550–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kollmann, T., Kuckertz, A., & Stöckmann, C. (2009). Continuous innovation in entrepreneurial growth companies: Exploring the ambidextrous strategy. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 17(3), 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuckertz, A. (2013). Entrepreneurship education—Status quo and prospective developments. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16, 59–71.Google Scholar
  28. Kuckertz, A., Berger, E. S. C., & Allmendinger, M. P. (2015). What drives entrepreneurship? A configurational analysis of the determinants of total entrepreneurial activity in innovation-based economies. Die Betriebswirtschaft—Business Administration Review, 75(4), 273–288.Google Scholar
  29. Kuckertz, A., & Wagner, M. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 52(5), 524–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. LeBrasseur, R., Zanibbi, L., & Zinger, T. J. (2003). Growth momentum in the early stages of small business start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 21(3), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 935–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Osteryoung, J. S., & Newman, D. (1993). What is a small business? The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 2(3), 219–231.Google Scholar
  34. Peterson, R. A., Albaum, G., & Kozmetsky, G. (1986). The public’s definition of small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3), 63–68.Google Scholar
  35. Pittaway, L., Rodriguez-Falcon, E., Aiyegbayo, O., & King, A. (2011). The role of entrepreneurship clubs and societies in entrepreneurial learning. International Small Business Journal, 29(1), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shane, S. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  38. Shepherd, D. A., Wiklund, J., & Haynie, M. J. (2009). Moving forward: Balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Use in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A Paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management [Special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.Google Scholar
  41. Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Timmons, J. A. (1997). New venture creation. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  43. Torrès, O., & Julien, P. A. (2005). Specificity and denaturing of small business. International Small Business Journal, 23(4), 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 120–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wheeler, C., Ibeh, K., & Dimitratos, P. (2008). UK export performance research: Review and implications. International Small Business Journal, 26(2), 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wynarczyk, P., Watson, R., Storey, D. J., Short, H., & Keasey, K. (1993). The managerial labour market in small and medium sized enterprises. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Zahra, S. A., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouraging dialogue and debate. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zahra, S. A., & Newey, L. R. (2009). Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1059–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations