Addressing Communication Security Issues in BAN Medical System: SIARS

  • Goce Stevanoski
  • Jugoslav Achkoski
  • Saso Koceski
  • Ana Madevska Bogdanova
  • Mitko BogdanoskiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 159)


Considerations for implementing system that will record medical condition of participants on the battlefield always follow a path for best data gathering, data analyzing and fast implementation of medical procedures for saving lives. Smart I (eye) Advisory Rescue System (SIARS) has aim to process and transmit medical data of injured or wounded person which will allow saving more injured patients and lessen the death-rate on the battlefield. The dataflow in the system has a military significance during the military missions and communication security must be on an appropriate level. This paper presents review for communication and authentication security challenges in the process of SIARS development. The overarching goal for security issue about the system is to determine the factors that are influencing the secure communication and authentication between endpoints. Furthermore, the paper presents the best practices for achieving secure communication and authentication by using existing solutions. The focal points in this paper are security gaps in Bluetooth Smart communication with data collectors and security issues in VHF radio and 4G communications for data transport to database elements.


BAN security Bluetooth security issues 4G security challenges 


  1. 1.
    ITU-T Recommendation X.805 Recommendation A.8: Security architecture for systems providing end-to-end communications, 29 October 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toorani, M.: On vulnerabilities of the security association in the IEEE 802.15.6 standard. In: Brenner, M., Christin, N., Johnson, B., Rohloff, K. (eds.) FC 2015 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 8976, pp. 245–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryan, M.: Bluetooth Smart: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, and the Fix! BlackHat USA, Las Vegas, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Association, T.I.S.: IEEE P802.15.6-2012 Standard for Wireless Body Area Networks (2012).
  5. 5.
    Harris Corporation, Tactical Radio and Networking, RF7800M –MP.
  6. 6.
    Bhasker, D.: 4G LTE security for mobile network operators. Cyber Secur. Inf. Sys. Inf. Anal. Cent. (CSIAC) 1(4), 20–29 (2013).
  7. 7.
    3rd Generation Partnership Project: TS 33.401: System Architecture Evolution (SAE); Security architecture. Network, ver.12.14.0, release 12, 3GPP, April 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) US Department of Commerce.
  9. 9.
    Donegn, P.: The security vulnerabilities of LTE: Opportunity & Risks for Operators, Heavy Reading, October 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris Corporation: Radio Communication in the Digital Age. vol. 1, edn. 2 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Goce Stevanoski
    • 1
  • Jugoslav Achkoski
    • 1
  • Saso Koceski
    • 2
  • Ana Madevska Bogdanova
    • 3
  • Mitko Bogdanoski
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Military Academy “General Mihailo Apostolski”Goce Delcev UniversitySkopjeMacedonia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer ScienceGoce Delcev UniversityStipRepublic of Macedonia
  3. 3.Faculty of Computer Science and EngineeringSaints Cyril and Methodius UniversitySkopjeMacedonia

Personalised recommendations