Abstract
This paper proposes a structural and procedural framework for developing performance measures for engineering asset management systems with an in-depth case study of an international glass manufacturer. The structural framework was built by adapting the Balanced Scorecard method to leading engineering asset management standards. Further, the procedural framework describes how to develop the performance measures systematically, and provides practical guidelines facilitate design process. Asset managers at different levels were brought together to use the proposed structural framework to an build asset management strategy map by linking and mapping all critical objectives in the defined perspectives. Subsequently performance measures are identified for each objective in the asset management strategy map. Finally all selected performance measures are critically reviewed with existing performance measures and qualitative feedback was collected from a senior participant. The results showed that the proposed structural and procedural framework are effective and efficient in helping asset-intensive organisations build their performance measurement systems for asset management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The name of the company has been changed to protect confidentiality.
References
Arthur D, et al. (2014) Asset planning performance measurement framework. In Proceedings of CEED Seminars 2014, Crawley, Australia.
Amadi-Echendu, J. et al. (2007) What is engineering asset management? In Proceedings 2nd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and the 4th International Conference on Condition Monitoring (pp. 116-129). Harrogate, United Kingdom.
Attwater, A., Wang, J., & Parlikad, A. (2014) Designing performance measures for asset management systems, In Proceedings of IET/IAM Asset Management Conference 2014, London, UK.
Cocca, P., & Alberti, M. (2010). A framework to assess performance measurement systems in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(2), 186–200.
El-Akruti, K., Dwight, R., & Zhang, T. (2013). The strategic role of engineering asset management. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 227–239.
Folan, P., & Browne, J. (2005). A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management. Computers in Industry, 56(7), 663–680.
Institute of Asset Management. (2015). An anatomy of asset management. Available at: http://theiam.org/what-is-asset-management/anatomy-asset-management. Accessed 21 Apr 2015.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1228–1263.
Roda, I., & Parlikad, A. (2015) A framework for implementing value-based approach in asset management, In Proceedings of Wceam2015, Tampere, Finland.
Simoes, J. M., et al. (2010) A literature review of maintenance performance measurement: Direction for future research. In Proceedings 34th Encontro da ANPAD 2010, Rio de Janeiro.
Woodhouse, J. (2009) Asset management: Latest thinking. John Woodhouse Partnership Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, J., Chen, Z., Parlikad, A. (2016). Designing Performance Measures for Asset Management Systems in Asset-Intensive Manufacturing Companies: A Case Study. In: Koskinen, K., et al. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2015). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27064-7_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27064-7_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27062-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27064-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)