Advertisement

Advanced Fault Tree Analysis for Improved Quality and Risk Assessment

  • Jussi-Pekka PenttinenEmail author
  • Timo Lehtinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Traditional fault tree analysis (FTA) has formed a common language for the modelling and analysis of risks of complex systems. The approach can be used for a large variety of cases, and several tools exists for the method. Advanced FTA is needed to apply the FTA approach also for dynamic systems with time dependent activities. The traditional FTA is extended by including for example modelling and simulation of operation or phase changes of the systems, stochasticity and delays of relations, and maintenance actions for the components. The rules between the failures and other simulated properties are defined by including Java-based scripts to the model. This allows a great freedom to model any type of dynamic situations. A tool named ELMAS has been created to make the use of the advanced FTA approach as straightforward as possible. It allows to model the static and simple relations by using the traditional FTA method. Complex and dynamic relations are included by using modules that can be freely defined based on the needs of the case.

Keywords

Maintenance Action Fault Tree Root Relation Fault Tree Analysis Risk Management Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. EN 31010. (2010). Risk management. Risk assessment techniques. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization.Google Scholar
  2. EN 13306. (2010). Maintenance. Maintenance terminology. European Committee for Standardization.Google Scholar
  3. ISO 31000. (2009). Risk management. principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization. Google Scholar
  4. ISO GUIDE 73. (2009). Risk management Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  5. NASA SE. (2007). NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA/SP-2007-6105 Rev1.Google Scholar
  6. Roberts, N. H., Vesely, W. E., Haasl, D. F., & Goldberg, F. F. (1981). Fault Tree Handbook, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-0492.Google Scholar
  7. Virtanen, S., Hagmark, P.-E., & Penttinen, J.-P. (2006). Modelling and analysis of causes and consequences of failures. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). 23–26 Jan 2006. CA, USA: Newport Beach.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ramentor OyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations