Skip to main content

The Europeanization of Romania in the Globalization Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Between Globalization and Integration

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

Abstract

The Romanian public administration space, the subject of this next chapter, is an active and dynamic player in the global debate of public administration reforms. The globalization forces that affect governance everywhere certainly have an impact in Romania as well. Over the last two decades, Romanian society has transitioned from a centrally planned, communist dictatorship with crumbling infrastructure and a stifled democracy to a newly integrated member of the European Union. Most political, economic, and administrative reforms that took place over this period were affected by these two monumental realities: the communist heritage and the European aspirations. As Romania’s interaction with globalization was filtered by these two realities, the dismantling of the old communist state and meeting the criteria for European integration became the palpable facets of globalization (Birzea, 2005a, 2005b; Crăciun, 2008; Crăciun & Collins, 2008a, 2008b; Hâncean, 2009a, 2009b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Constitution of Romania of 1991, art. 1, paragraph 3.

  2. 2.

    The Romanian Constitution of 2003, Article 120, alg. 1.

References

  • Agh, A. (2003). Public administration in Central Eastern Europe. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 536–548). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. S. (2004). The mosaic of Europeanization. An organizational perspective on national re-contextualization (ARENA Working Papers, WP 04/11). Oslo, Norway: Centre for European Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. (2010). Europeanization and multi-level governance: EU cohesion policy and pre-accession aid in Southeast Europe. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bădescu, G. (2008). Democratizare, valori si educaţie şcolară (Democratization, values and school education). Barometrul de Opinie Publică 1998–2007 (pp. 78–90). București, Romania: Soros Foundation Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bărbulescu, I. G. (2001). Uniunea Europeană—Aprofundare şi Extindere: De la Comunităţile Europene la Uniunea Europeană [The European Union—Integration and expansion: From European Communities to the European Union]. Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Trei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bărbulescu, I. G. (2005). UE de la economic la politic [EU from economics to politics]. Bucureşti, Romania: Tritonic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzea, C. (2001). Politicile şi instituţiile Uniunii Europene [The politics and institutions of the EU] (p. 245). Bucureşti, Romania: Corint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzea, C. (2005). Cetăţenia europeană [European citizenship] (p. 262). Bucureşti, Romania: Politeia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzea, C. (2005b). Learning democracy (p. 118). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondar, F. (2007). Politici publice şi administraţie publică [Public policies and public administration]. Bucureşti, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, F. (1999). Civil services for the European administrative space. Public Management Forum, 5(2), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comșa, R. (2008). The decentralization of public services: A never-ending story? In C. Crăciun & P. Collins (Eds.), Public policy management: Transformation and perspectives. Iași, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crăciun, C. (2008). The transformation of governance in Romania. Challenges for public policy management. In C. Crăciun & P. E. Collins (Eds.), Public policies management: Changes and perspectives. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crăciun, C., & Collins, P. E. (2008). Puterea în tranziţie: designul reformelor administraţiei publice în statele aflate în tranziţie. Cazul României [The power in transition: Public administration reform design in transitional states] In Managementul politicilor publice: transformări și perspective (pp. 57–73). Iași, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crăciun, C., & Collins, P. E. (2008). Transformarea guvernării în România. Provocări pentru managementul politicilor, in Managementul politicilor publice: transformări şi perspective. Iași, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmke, C. (2004). Funcţia Publică Europeană [The European civil service]. București, Romania: Editura Economică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, V., Goetz, K., & Wollmann, H. (2006). Governing after communism. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, A. L. (2002). Enlargement, institution-building, and the EU’s administrative capacity requirement. West European Politics, 25(4), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, A. L. (2005). Europeanization and civil service reform in Central and Eastern Europe. In F. Schimmelfennig & U. Sedelmeier (Eds.), The Europeanization of central and eastern Europe (pp. 71–90). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate B, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Policy Department, European Parliament. (2006, September 27). Update—Note on Romania’s preparations for EU accession (PE 366.235). Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://english.hotnews.ro/stiri-archive-1753027-european-parliament-vote-romania-report-late-december.htm.

  • Dobre, A. M. (2010). Europeanization and new patterns of multi-level governance in Romania. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. (1995). Understanding public policy. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekiert, G., Kubik, J., & Vachudova, M. A. (2007). Democracy in the post-communist world: An unending quest? East European Politics and Societies, 21(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission Monitoring Report on Romania. (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission Monitoring Report on Romania. (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission Monitoring Report on Romania. (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • European council conclusions. (1997). Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • European council conclusions. (1999). Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The politics of Europeanization. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, J. (1998). Governance and European integration—Reliable public administration (SIGMA Papers no. 23). Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space (pp. 119–135).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (2003). Nations in transit—Romania 2003 country report. Prepared by Sandra Pralong and Mirela Apostol. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from www.freedomhouse.org.

  • Freedom House. (2006). Nations in transit—Romania 2006 country report. Prepared by Alina Mungiu-Pippidi. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from www.freedomhouse.org.

  • Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M., & Whitten, G. D. (1997). Economic conditions, economic perceptions, and public support for European integration. Political Behavior, 19(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, T. (2006, September 27). The European Union and Romania: Consolidating backwardness? Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-europefuture/EU_romania_3943.jsp.

  • Giosan, V. (2008). Reforma sectorului public şi reforma clasei politice: este posibilă sincronizarea? [The public sector reform and political class reform: Is the synchronization possible?] (pp. 75–89). In Managementul politicilor publice: transformări şi perspective, Claudiu Crăciun, Paul E. Collins (coord). Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. H. (2001). Making sense of post-communist central administration: Modernization, Europeanization or Latinization? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 1032–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. H., & Wollmann, H. (2001). Governmentalizing central executives in post-communist Europe: A four-country comparison. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 864–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2002). European Union conditionality and the acquis communitaire. International Political Science Review, 23(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2003). The implications of EU enlargement. In S. While, J. Batt, & P. Lewis (Eds.), Developments in Central and East European politics 3 (pp. 253–266). Houndmills, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2008). Transformational power of EU. Europeanization through the conditions of accession in Central and Eastern Europe. Chișinău, Moldova: Epigraph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, A. (2007). Rebuilding Leviathan: Party competition and state exploitation in post-communist democracies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, L. A., & Hogwood, B. W. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press [Romanian transl. (2000). Introducere în politicile publice, Bucureşti: Editura Trei].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hâncean, M.-G. (2009a, March 30). Cadrul teoretic şi de evaluare a politicilor publice, in Abordare comparativă: politicile publice, în context naţional şi european, Marian—Gabriel Hâncean and Nicolae Toderaş, 3-12. Study presented at the conference Politicile Publice Româneşti, Încotro? SNSPA. Retrieved July 30, 2012, from http://www.europolity.ro/assets/files/Cercetare%20romana/2009.%201.%20Martie/Studiul%20Politici%20Publice%2030.03.pdf.

  • Hâncean, M.-G. (2009b). Cadrul teoretic de referinţă [The reference theoretical framework]. In Propunere de indicatori de performanţă în vederea proiectării unui proces de benchmarking la nivelul instituţiilor de învăţământ superior din România, Liviu Andreescu et al, document elaborated at ACADEMIS and published online by ARACIS—Agenţia Română de Asigurare a Calităţii în Învăţământul Superior. Retrieved July 30, 2012, from http://proiecte.aracis.ro/fileadmin/Academis/A3/1._Propunere_de_indicatori_pentru_benchmarking_-_oct.pdf.

  • Hesse, J. J. (1998). Rebuilding the state: Administrative reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Preparing Public Administration for the European Administrative Space (pp. 168–179). Paris: OECD. SIGMA Papers No. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchins, K. (1996). The Romanians. Oxford, England: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iancu, D. C. (2010). European Union and public administration. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. (2005). The enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the institutional menu in Central Europe. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2008). Consolidarea proiectului de buget cu ajutorul proceselor, alegerea politicilor şi alegerea resurselor [The consolidation of budgeting project with the aid of processes, politics and resources choice]. In Transformarea guvernării în România. Provocări pentru managementul politicilor, Claudiu Crăciun in Managementul politicilor publice: transformări și perspective, Claudiu Crăciun, Paul E. Collins (coord.). Iași, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (1999). How Europe matters. Different mechanisms of Europeanization. European Integration online papers, 3(7). Retrieved July 30, 2012, from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007a.htm.

  • Kornai, J. (1992). The socialist system: The political economy of communism (p. 52). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The policy sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mărgineanu, I. (Ed.). (2001). Analiza comparativă a finanţării politicilor sociale: România—ţări în tranziţie—ţările U.E. [The comparative analysis of the social policies fundings: Romania—Transitional countries—The EU Countries] Comisia Antisărăcie și Promovarea Incluziunii Sociale, București.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matei, L. (2009a). Romanian public management reform (Administration and public services, Vol. 1). Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Economică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matei, L. (2009b). Romanian public management reform (Civil service, Vol. 2). Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Economică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matei, L. (2010). Romanian public management reform—Theoretical and empirical studies (Vol. 1 and 2). Bucharest, Romania: Editura Economică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matei, A., & Dogaru, T. C. (2011). The reform of the national public policies process under the influence of Europeanization changes in the policy-making in Romania on institutional and legislative level. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 18(1(554)), 75–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matei, A., & Matei, L. (2010). European administration. Normative fundaments and systemic models. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1651782.

  • Matei, L., & Matei, A. (2010). The economic and social impact of public administration Europeanization. 32nd EGPA Annual Temporalities. Public Administration and Public Policies Conference. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/24267/.

  • Matei, A., Matei, L., & Iancu, D. C. (2011). Socio-statistical research on the internalization of European administrative space principles in Romanian public administration. Administrative Sciences, 1(1), 45–55. South-Eastern European Administrative Studies (AS see Online Series No. 6/2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matei, A., Roșca, I. G., & Tudorel, A. (2009). The corruption. An Economic and Social Analysis. Bucharest, Romania: Editura Economică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling, J. H. (2006). The rise of the Partisan state? Parties, patronage and the ministerial bureaucracy in Hungary. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(3), 274–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling, H. I. (2008). Varieties of legacies: A critical review of public administration reform in East Central Europe. European University Institute, Max Weber Programme (EUI working paper MWP, No. 2008/39).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling, J. H. (2008b). The changing colors of the post-communist state: The politicisation of the senior civil service in Hungary. European Journal of Political Research, 47(1), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morar, F. (2002). The way out and the way in: Post-communism and democracy in Romania. Romanian Political Science Review, 2(1), 77–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munteanu, Ş. (2006). Integrarea Europeană. O perspectivă juridico-filosofică, Ed. C. H. Beck, Bucureşti, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrescu, D. (2002). Mai binele este duşmanul binelui. Aşteptările neîmplinite ale privatizării româneşti [Better is the enemy of good. Unfulfilled expectations of Romanian privatization]. Centrul Român de Politici Economice. Retrieved from www.cerope.ro.

  • Nunberg, B. (Ed.). (1999). The state after communism: Administrative transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, C. (2002). Civilizing state bureaucracy: The unfulfilled promise of public administration reform in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic (1990–2000). Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies. Working Paper Series, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, C. (2006). Runaway state-building: Patronage politics and democratic development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2002). The many faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5), 921–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Păunescu, M. (2008). Managementul sectorului public [The management of public sector]. In Management public în România, Iași, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersone, B. (2008a). The process of public policy: An external perspective. In C. Crăciun & P. Collins (Eds.), Public policy management. Iași, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersone, B. (2008). Consolidarea capacităţii Guvernului României de a gestiona şi a coordona politicile publice şi de a aplica procesul decizional [The Consolidation of Romanian Government Capacity to Administer and Coordinate the Public Policies and to Apply the Decisional Process]. In Transformarea guvernării în România, Provocări pentru managementul politicilor, Claudiu Crăciun in Managementul politicilor publice: transformări și perspective, Claudiu Crăciun, Paul E. Collins (coord.), (pp. 247–269). Iași, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinnemore, D. (2003, October 31). Romania and the European Union: From marginalization to inclusion? Paper presented at the conference Romania and the European Union: The challenge of domestic reform, Hellenic Observatory, European Institute, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pop-Eleches, G. (2007). Whither democracy? The politics of dejection in the 2000 Romanian elections. Berkeley program in Soviet and Post-Soviet studies working paper series, University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency Conclusions. (1993, June 21–22). Copenhagen European Council, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridham, G. (2005). Designing democracy: EU enlargement and regime change in postcommunist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, U. (2006). Europeanization in new members and candidate states. Living Reviews in European Governance, 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachudova, A. M. (2002, March 22–27). The leverage of the European Union on reform in post-communist Europe. Enlargement and European Governance, ECPR Joint Session Workshops, Turin, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheijen, T., & Rabrenovic, A. (2001). The evolution of politico-administrative relations in post-communist states: Main directions. In T. Verheijen (Ed.), Politico-administrative relations: Who rules? (pp. 410–426). Bratislava, Slovakia: NISPAcee.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2004). Albania: Decentralization in transition, Volume II: Analytical report, poverty reduction and economic management unit. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Report. (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2008a). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 137–165). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. (2008b). Democratic and market governance in Romania: Between domestic politics and EU accession. Review of European and Russian Affairs, 4(1), 73–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Văduva, S. (2016). The Europeanization of Romania in the Globalization Context. In: Between Globalization and Integration. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27009-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics