The Business Civil Society and its Impact on Romanian Public Administration

  • Sebastian Văduva
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)


The reform initiatives of the past two decades in Romania are praiseworthy, and the incontestable fact is that the state of the economy and the government is significantly better now than at the dawn of the 1989 Revolution. The Europeanization of the public administration is partially successful, especially in the capital city and a few other urban centers. There are a number of ongoing, successful public administration reform initiatives throughout the country, some of which I have outlined in previous chapters. This continuous work is vitally important and necessary to improve customer/citizen services, agency design, increase efficiency, and modernize the Romanian public administration. In the concluding chapter of this volume, I would like to attempt a modest theoretical contribution to the Romanian public administration reform dialogue, not from a traditionalist bureaucratic perspective but rather from a libertarian, free-market, somewhat postmodern public administration theory. My conceptual approach will be that current traditional public administration reform initiatives ought to be complemented by the revitalization of the civil society, individual responsibilities, and voluntary initiatives.


Corporate Social Responsibility Social Capital Civil Society Public Administration Entrepreneurial Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alexander, J. C. (1998). Real civil societies: Dilemmas of institutionalization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  3. Anheier, H., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (2001). Introducing global civil society. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2001. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, K. A. (2008). Rediscovering civil society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance. European Law Journal, 8(1), 102–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ash, T. G. (1990). The magic lantern: The revolution of ‘89 witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin and Prague. New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimating. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2000). Globalization, tax competition, and the fiscal crisis of the welfare state. Harvard Law Review, 113, 1575–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Badea, A. S. (2012). Corruption-an inhibiting factor for the efficient implementation of structural funds in Romania. CES Working Papers, 4(2), 110–120.Google Scholar
  9. Banfield, E. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Barnouw, V. (1979). Ethnopsychology; personality and culture. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  11. Baron, D. P. (2003). Private politics. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12, 31–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bermeo, N. G., & Nord, P. G. (2000). Civil society before democracy: Lessons from nineteenth-century Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Blaney, D. L., & Pasha, M. K. (1993). Civil society and democracy in the Third World: Ambiguities and historical possibilities. Studies in Comparative International Development, 28(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bleahu, A. (2004). Romanian migration to Spain. Motivation, networks and strategies. New patterns of labour migration in Central and Eastern Europe. Cluj-Napoca, Rumania: Public Policy Centre.Google Scholar
  16. Boddewyn, J. (1995). The legitimacy of international-business political behavior. International Trade Journal, 9, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.). (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Boyett, I. (1997). The public sector entrepreneur—A definition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 3(2), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bozeman, A. B. (1994). Politics and culture in international history: From the ancient Near East to the opening of the modern age. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Brush, C. G., & Hisrich, R. D. (1991). Antecedent influences on women-owned businesses. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 6(2), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruszt, L., Campos, N. F., Fidrmuc, J., & Roland, G. (2010). Civil society, institutional change and the politics of reform: The great transition. Budapest, Hungary: European University Institute and Central European University.Google Scholar
  22. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent—Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Busenitz, L., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Caruana, A., Ewing, M., & Ramaseshan, B. (2002). Effects of some environmental challenges and centralization on the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of public sector entities. The Service Industries Journal, 22(2), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chambers, P., & Thomson, A. (2005). Political religion and political change in Wales. Sociology, 39(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clark, J. (1990). Democratizing development: The role of voluntary organizations. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  27. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Colwell, K., & Narayanan, V. K. (2010). Foresight in economic development policy: Shaping the institutional context for entrepreneurial innovation futures. Original Research Journal, 42(4), 295–303.Google Scholar
  29. Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice., 16(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  30. Cragg, W. (Ed.). (2005). Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization. Toronto, ON, Canada: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Crawford, N. C. (2002). Argument and change in world politics: Ethics, decolonialization, and humanitarian intervention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Crouch, C. (2006). Modeling the firm in its market and organizational environment: Methodologies for studying corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 27, 1533–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cumming, D. (2007). Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cutler, A. C. (2001). Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of international law and organization: A crisis of legitimacy. Review of International Studies, 27, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Day, J. D., & Jung, M. (2000). Corporate transformation without a crisis. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 116–127.Google Scholar
  36. Deitelhoff, N. (2009). The discursive process of legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization, 63, 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modeling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Di Palma, G. (1991). Legitimation from the top to civil society: Politico-cultural change in Eastern Europe. World Politics, 44(01), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dietz, S. (1980). Die Buddhistische Briefliteratur Indiens. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  41. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eisenstadt, S. N., & Lemarchand, R. (Eds.). (1981). Political clientelism, patronage and development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, clients and friends: Interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Elster, J. (1986). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Elster & A. Hylland (Eds.), Foundations of social choice theory (pp. 103–132). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Esman, M. J., & Uphoff, N. T. (1984). Local organizations: Intermediaries in rural development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Frederick, D. (2009). The role of corruption in emerging economies the case of Romania. In Emerging issues and challenges in business & economics: Selected Contributions from the 8th Global Conference (p. 301). Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Frenkel, S. J., & Scott, D. (2002). Compliance, collaboration, and codes of labor practice: The Adidas connection. California Management Review, 45(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Frye, T., & Shleifer, A. (1997). The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. American economic review. American Economic Association, 87(2), 354–358.Google Scholar
  50. Fung, A. (2003). Deliberative democracy and international labor standards. Governance, 16, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gellner, E. (1994). Conditions of liberty: Civil society and its rivals. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  52. Greeley, A. (1997). Coleman revisited. Religious structures as a source of social capital. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gutman, A., & Thompson, F. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  54. Gutman, A., & Thompson, F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Heins, V. (2004). Civil society’s barbarisms. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(4), 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hellman, J., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption, and influence in transition. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444. World Bank Institute and EBRD.Google Scholar
  57. Henderson, P. D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  58. Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures, and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue, and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 447–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30, 837–857.Google Scholar
  61. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Hopkins, M. O. (2012). Romania’s civil society and its moral underpinnings: The symbolic discourse of a post-socialist state. Multilingual Discourses, 1(1), 21.Google Scholar
  64. Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53, 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economical and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Isenberg, D. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  69. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  70. Kaul, I., Conceiçăo, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing global public goods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Keane, J. (1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Keil, T. J. (2006). Romania’s tortured road toward modernity. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs.Google Scholar
  74. Keim, G. D. (2001). Business and public policy. Competing in the political market place. In M. Hitt, R. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 583–601). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  75. Kessides, N. I. (2004). Reforming infrastructure: Privatization, regulation, and competition. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kohler-Koch, B. (2009). The three worlds of European civil society? What role for civil society for what kind of Europe? Policy and Society, 28(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kroeber, A. L., & Parsons, T. (1958). The concept of culture and of social system. American Sociological Review, 23, 582–583.Google Scholar
  78. Kumar, S. (2007). Methods for community participation. A complete guide for the practitioners. Bourton on Dunsmore, Rugby, Warwickshire, England: ITDG.Google Scholar
  79. LaClair, J. A., & Rao, R. P. (2002). Helping Employees Embrace Change. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 17–20.Google Scholar
  80. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lawson, E., & Price, C. (2003). The psychology of change management. The McKinsey Quarterly, Special edition: The value in organization, pp. 30–41.Google Scholar
  82. Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35, 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Linder, A. A. (2010). A study of Horatio Alger| His work and the times (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Connecticut State University).Google Scholar
  84. Locke, J. (1988). Locke: Two treatises of government student edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor relations and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Marx, K. (1972). The Marx-Engels reader (Vol. 4). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  88. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. McGee, R. (2005). The ethics of tax evasion: A survey of Romanian business students and faculty. Available at SSRN 813345.Google Scholar
  90. McGee, R. W., & Gelman, W. (2009). Opinions on the ethics of tax evasion: A comparative study of ten transition economies. Accounting Reform in Transition and Developing Economies, 12, 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). More like each other than anyone else? A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  93. Michael, B. (2004). The rise and fall of the anti-corruption industry: Toward second generation anti-corruption reforms in Central and Eastern Europe? Budapest, Hungary: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.Google Scholar
  94. Miclea, M. (2005). Raport asupra stării sistemului naţional de învăţământ (Report on National Education System State).Google Scholar
  95. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Miller, W. L., Grødeland, A., & Koshechkina, T. Y. (2001). A culture of corruption? Coping with government in postcommunist Europe. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unproductive, or destructive? New York: Baylor University.Google Scholar
  98. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 750–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mitchell, W., & Simmons, R. T. (1994). Beyond politics: Markets, welfare, and the failure of bureaucracy. Independent Studies in Political Economy, 4(4), 601–613.Google Scholar
  100. Mondrack, S. (2008). The protestant work ethic revisited: A promising concept or an outdated idea? Social Science Research Center Berlin. Employment Social Structure and Welfare State.Google Scholar
  101. Moynihan, D. P. (2006a). Ambiguity in policy lessons: The agencification experience. Public Administration, 84, 1029–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. University of Wisconsin-Madison. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00557.x.Google Scholar
  103. Müller, H. (2004). Arguing, bargaining and all that: Communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10, 395–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. The Australian Quarterly, December 1968. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  105. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 773–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Parker, G. R. (2004). Self-policing in politics: The political economy of reputational controls on politicians. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Pascaru, M., & Buţiu, C. A. (2009). Civil society, public participation and religious affiliation. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 8, 22.Google Scholar
  112. Pearce, J. A., II, & Doh, J. P. (2005). The high impact of collaborative social initiatives. Sloan Management Review, 46, 30–38.Google Scholar
  113. Przeworski, A., Limongi, F., & Alvarez, M. E. (1996). What makes democracies endure? Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 39–55. Published in Spanish Agora 3(5):67-87, 1996; in Portuguese in Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política 40/41:113-136, 1997; in Polish in Civitas (Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Radu, M. (1998). The burden of eastern orthodoxy. Religion in World Affairs. JAI Press. doi:10.1016/S0030-4387(98)90007-2Google Scholar
  116. Ramamurti, R. (1986). Public entrepreneurs: Who they are and how they operate. California Management Review, 28(3), 142–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. Applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rau, Z. (Ed.). (1991). The reemergence of civil society in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  119. Ray, J. J. (1982). The protestant ethic in Australia. Journal of Social Psychology, 116(1), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Riddell, R., & Robinson, M. (1995). Non-governmental organizations and rural poverty alleviation. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  121. Rifkin, J. (1995). The end of work. The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  122. Risse, T. (1999). International norms and domestic change: Arguing and communicative behavior in the human rights area. Politics and Society, 27, 529–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Risse, T. (2002). Transnational actors and world politics. In W. von Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 255–274). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  124. Risse, T. (2004). Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39, 288–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Roach, B. (2005). A primer on multinational corporations. In A. D. Chandler & B. Mazlish (Eds.), Leviathans. Multinational corporations and the new global history (pp. 19–44). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Roloff, J. (2007). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focused stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government, causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Rose-Ackerman, S., & Kornai, J. (Eds.). (2004). Building a trustworthy state in post socialist transition. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  129. Rothstein, B. (2009). Anti-corruption—A Big Bang theory. QoG Working Paper No. 2007:3.Google Scholar
  130. Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Cambridge, England: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  131. Ruggie, J. G. (2004). Reconstructing the global public domain: Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10, 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Sadler, R. J. (2000). Corporate entrepreneurship in the public sector: The dance of the chameleon. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 3, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sandu, D. (2007). Community selectivity of temporary emigration from Romania. Romanian Journal of Population Studies, 1-2, 11.Google Scholar
  135. Saulean, D., & Epure, C. (1998). Defining the nonprofit sector: Romania, In L. Salamon, & H. Anheier (eds.) The John Hopkins comparative nonprofit sector. Google Scholar
  136. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility. Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo G. (2010). The political role of global business and civil society actors—A paradigm shift in business and society and its implications for CSR, governance, and democracy. 5th Organization Studies Summer Workshop 2010. Social Movements, Civil Societies and Corporations. Margaux, France, 26–28 May 2010.Google Scholar
  138. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 502–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Scherer, A. G., & Smid, M. (2000). The downward spiral and the U.S. model principles. Why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of World-Wide social and environmental conditions. Management International Review, 40, 351–371.Google Scholar
  140. Schroth, P. W., & Bostan, A. D. (2004). International constitutional law and anti-corruption measures in the European Union’s accession negotiations: Romania in comparative perspective. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 12, 625–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Seligman, A. (Ed.). (2004). Modest claims: Dialogues and essay on tolerance and tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  142. Shamir, R. (2004). Between self-regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the contested concept of corporate social responsibility. Law & Society Review, 38, 635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Spar, D. L., & La Mure, L. T. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Stansbury, J. (2008). Reasoned moral agreement: Applying discourse ethics within organization. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Strand, R. (1983). A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 90–96.Google Scholar
  146. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  147. Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Terry, L. D. (1993). Why we should abandon the misconceived quest to reconcile public entrepreneurship with democracy: A response to Bellone and Goerl’s “Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and Democracy”. Public Administration Review, 53(4), 393–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. New York: Irwin.Google Scholar
  153. Utting, P. (2002). Regulating business via multi-stakeholders initiatives: A preliminary assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  154. Văduva, S. (2004). Antreprenoriatul. Practici aplicative în România şi în alte ţări în tranziţie, Editura Economică.Google Scholar
  155. Vlăsceanu, M. (2010). Economie socială şi antreprenoriat. O analiză a sectorului non-profit. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.Google Scholar
  156. Wallace, C., Pichler, F., & Haerpfer, C. (2012). Changing patterns of civil society in Europe and America 1995–2005 is Eastern Europe different? East European Politics & Societies, 26(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  158. Wennekers, A. R. M., Noorderhaven, N. G., Hofstede, G., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). Cultural and economic determinants of business ownership across countries. Frontiers for Entrepreneurship, Babson College.Google Scholar
  159. Whetton, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41, 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Wolf, K. D. (2005). Private actors and the legitimacy of governance beyond the state: Conceptional outlines and empirical explorations. In A. Benz & I. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Governance and democratic legitimacy (pp. 200–227). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  162. Wolf, K. D. (2008). Emerging patterns of global governance: The new interplay between the state, business and civil society. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 225–248). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  163. Yaziji, M., & Doh, J. (2009). NGOs and corporations. Conflict and collaboration. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Zakaria, F. (2003). The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. Political science. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  165. Zamfir, C. (Ed.). (2001). Poverty overcoming strategies. Bucureşti, Hungary: UNDP România.Google Scholar
  166. Zampetakis, L. A., & Moustakis, V. (2007). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship through internal marketing implications for change in the public sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(4), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Zürn, M. (2002). From interdependence to globalization. In W. von Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 235–254). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Văduva
    • 1
  1. 1.Griffiths School of ManagementEmanuel University of OradeaOradeaRomania

Personalised recommendations