Skip to main content

Platform Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Implant Dentistry

Abstract

Implant platform is defined as the portion of the implant on which the abutment rests. Platform-switching design uses an abutment that is smaller in diameter than the outer edge of the implant neck. This particular design has been found to be associated with reduced marginal bone loss. It remains to be established if this favorable outcome occurs in all the clinical situations and with which extent. Possible factors that seem to contribute to the preservation of marginal bone in platform-switched implants are the shifting of the microbial leakage far from the bone or of the abutment-platform micromotion. Other cofactors may also contribute. Scalloped implant design is a new platform solution indicated in the esthetic zones, but although promising, more clinical studies are needed to confirm its validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. P.P. Binon, Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 15(1), 76 (2000)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. B.R. Chrcanovic, T. Albrektsson, A. Wennerberg, Platform switch and dental implants: a meta-analysis. J. Dent. 43, 629–646 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M.M. Al-Nsour, H.L. Chan, H.L. Wang, Effect of the platform-switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27(1), 138–145 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Annibali, I. Bignozzi, M.P. Cristalli, F. Graziani, G. La Monaca, A. Polimeni, Peri‐implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J. Clin. Periodontol. 39(11), 1097–1113 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Atieh, H.M. Ibrahim, A.H. Atieh, Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Periodontol. 81(10), 1350–1366 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J.S. Hermann, J.D. Schoolfield, R.K. Schenk, D. Buser, D.L. Cochran, Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J. Periodontol. 72, 1372–1383 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. D.L. Cochran, P.V. Nummikoski, J.D. Schoolfield, A.A. Jones, T.W. Oates, A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients. J. Periodontol. 80, 725–733 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Becker, I. Mihatovic, V. Golubovic, F. Schwarz, Impact of abutment material and dis-re-connection on soft and hard tissue changes at implants with platform-switching. J. Clin. Periodontol. 39, 774–780 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Koutouzis, The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 28, 807–814 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Degidi, D. Nardi, A. Piattelli, One abutment at one time: non- removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 22, 1303–1307 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Vigolo, A. Givani, Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 24, 103–109 (2009)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Luongo, E. Bressan, M.G. Grusovin, F. d’Avenia, K. Neumann, L. Sbricoli, M. Esposito, Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 8(2), 129–140 (2015)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C.C. Alves, F. Muñoz, I. Ramos, M. Neves, J. Blanco, Marginal bone and soft tissue behavior following platform switching abutment connection/disconnection a dog model study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 26, 983–991 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Maeda, J. Miura, I. Taki, M. Sogo, Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18, 581–584 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. C.L. Chang, C.S. Chen, M.L. Hsu, Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 25, 295–304 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Schrotenboer, Y.P. Tsao, V. Kinariwala, H.L. Wang, Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Implant Dent. 18, 260–269 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. E.P. Pellizzer, R.M. Falcòn-Antenucci, P.S. de Carvalho, J.F. Santiago, S.L. de Moraes, B.M. de Cravalho, Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants. J. Oral Implantol. 36(6), 419–430 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Hsu, F. Lj, D. Lin, Y. Shen, H. Hl, Bone strain and interfacial sliding analyses of platform switching and implant diameter on an immediately loaded implant: experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses. J. Periodontol. 80, 1125–1132 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Maeda, M. Horisaka, K. Yagi, Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 19, 271–275 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Liu, C. Tang, J. Yu, W. Dai, Y. Bao, D. Hu, The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 112, 1111–1118 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Berglundh, J. Lindhe, Dimension of the peri-implant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J. Clin. Periodontol. 23, 971–973 (1996)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Hansson, The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biochemical approach. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 10, 394–405 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. J.L. Ricci, J. Charvet, S. Frenkel et al., Bone response to laser microtextured surfaces, in Bone engineering, ed. by J.E. Davies (EM Squared, Toronto, 2000), pp. 282–294

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Alexander, J.L. Ricci, G.J. Hrico, Mechanical basis for bone retention around dental implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 23, 200–210 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Botos, H. Yousef, B. Zweig, R. Flinton, S. Weiner, The effects of laser microtexturing of the implant collar on crestal bone levels and peri-implant health. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 26, 492–498 (2011)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Bassetti, R. Kaufmann, A. Ebinger, R. Mericske-Stern, N. Enkling, Is a grooved collar implant design superior to a machined design regarding bone level alteration? An observational pilot study. Quintessence Int. 45, 221–229 (2014)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Linkevicius, A. Puisys, O. Svediene, R. Linkevicius, L. Linkeviciene, Radiological comparison of laser- microtextured and platform-switched implants in thin mucosal biotype. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 26, 599–605 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. R.J. Lazzara, S.S. Porter, Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 26, 9–17 (2006)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Luongo, T. Traini, P.C. Guidone, G. Bianco, R. Cocchetto, R. Celletti, Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 28, 551–557 (2008)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. N. Enkling, P. Johren, J. Katsoulis, S. Bayer, P.M. Jervoe-Storm, R. Mericske-Stern et al., Influence of platform switching on bone-level alterations: a three-year randomized clinical trial. J. Dent. Res. 92, 139s–145s (2013)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Telleman, G.M. Raghoebar, A. Vissink, H.J. Meijer, Impact of platform switching on peri-implant bone remodeling around short implants in the posterior region, 1-year results from a split-mouth clinical trial. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 16, 70–80 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. L. Canullo, G.R. Fedele, G. Iannello, S. Jepsen, Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized- controlled trial. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21, 115–121 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Cocchetto, T. Traini, F. Caddeo, R. Celletti, Evaluation of hard tissue response around wider plat- form-switched implants. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 30, 163–171 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Hürzeler, S. Fickl, O. Zuhr, H.C. Wachtel, Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 65(Suppl. 1), 33–39 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Cappiello, R. Luongo, D. Di Iorio, C. Bugea, R. Cocchetto, R. Celletti, Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 28, 347–355 (2008)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. L. Prosper, S. Redaelli, M. Pasi, F. Zarone, G. Radaelli, E.F. Gherlone, A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 24, 299–308 (2009)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. G.M. Baffone, D. Botticelli, F. Pantani, L.C. Cardoso, M.T. Schweikert, N.P. Lang, Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: an experimental study in dog. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 438–444 (2011). A. Mombelli, M.A. Van Oosten, E. Schurch Jr, N.P. Land, The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2, 145–151 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  38. U. Covani, S. Marconcini, R. Crespi, A. Barone, Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces. Implant Dent. 15, 298–304 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. J.S. Hermann, D.L. Cochran, P.V. Nummikoski, D. Buser, Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J. Periodontol. 68, 1117–1130 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. M.P. Hanggi, D.C. Hanggi, J.D. Schoolfield, J. Meyer, D.L. Cochran, J.S. Hermann, crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: a retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths. J. Periodontol. 76, 791–802 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. J.S. Hermann, D. Buser, R.K. Schenk, D.L. Cochran, Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J. Periodontol. 71, 1412–1424 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Degidi, D. Nardi, A. Piattelli, Immediate loading of the edentulous maxilla with a final restoration supported by an intraoral welded titanium bar: a case series of 20 consecutive cases. J. Periodontol. 79, 2207–2213 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Berberi, G. Tehini, K. Rifai, F.B.N. Eddine, B. Badran, H. Akl, Leakage evaluation of original and compatible implant–abutment connections: in vitro study using Rhodamine B. J Dent. Biomech. 5, 1–7 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. D. Tripodi, G. Vantaggiato, A. Scarano, V. Perrotti, A. Piattelli, G. Iezzi, S. D’Ercole, An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and morse taper implant-abutment connections. Implant Dent. 21, 335–339 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. M.E. Jaworski, A.C. Moreira Melo, C.M. Telles Picheth, I.A. de Mattias Sartori, Analysis of the bacterial seal at the implant-abutment interface in external-hexagon and morse taper–connection implants: an in vitro study using a new methodology. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27, 1091–1095 (2012)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. E.A. Bratu, M. Tandlich, L. Shapira, A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20, 827–832 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. S.Y. Lee, C.M. Piao, J.Y. Koak et al., A 3-year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around different implant systems. J. Oral Rehabil. 37, 538–544 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. H.J. Nickenig, M. Wichmann, K.A. Schlegel, E. Nkenke, S. Eitner, Radio- graphic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel- screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20, 550–554 (2009)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. D.W. Song, D.W. Lee, C.K. Kim, K.H. Park, I.S. Moon, Comparative analysis of peri-implant marginal bone loss based on microthread location: a 1-year prospective study after loading. J. Periodontol. 80, 1937–1944 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. B.R. Chrcanovic, A.R. Pedrosa, M.D. Martins, Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants. Mater Res 15, 372–382 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. B.R. Chrcanovic, N.L.C. Leao, M.D. Martins, Influence of different acid etchings on the superficial characteristics of Ti sandblasted with Al2O3. Mater Res 16, 1006–1014 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. B.R. Chrcanovic, M.D. Martins, Study of the influence of acid etching treatments on the superficial characteristics of Ti. Mater Res 17, 373–380 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 25, 63–74 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. M.R. Norton, Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 9, 91–99 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. L. Canullo et al., Inclined implant platform for the amplified platform-switching concept: 18-month follow-up report of a prospective randomized matched-pair controlled trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27, 927–934 (2012)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. X. Rodriguez-Ciurana, X. Vela-Nebot, M. Segalà-Torres, C. Rodado-Alonso, V. Méndez-Blanco, M. Mata-Bugueroles, Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment con- figurations. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 29, 479–487 (2009)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. P.S. Wöhrle, Nobel perfect™ esthetic scalloped implant: rationale for a new design. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 5(s1), 64–73 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. H. Nowzari, W. Chee, K. Yi, M. Pak, W.H. Chung, S. Rich, Scalloped dental implants: a retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 NobelPerfectTM implants in 6 patients. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 8(1), 1–10 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. J.Y. Kan, K. Rungcharassaeng, G. Liddelow, P. Henry, C.J. Goodacre, Periimplant tissue response following immediate provisional restoration of scalloped implants in the esthetic zone: a one-year pilot prospective multicenter study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 97(6), S109–S118 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. L. den Hartog, H.J. Meijer, B. Stegenga, N. Tymstra, A. Vissink, G.M. Raghoebar, Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 22(11), 1289–1297 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. N. Tymstra, G.M. Raghoebar, A. Vissink, L. Den Hartog, K. Stellingsma, H.J. Meijer, Treatment outcome of two adjacent implant crowns with different implant platform designs in the aesthetic zone: a 1‐year randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 38(1), 74–85 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. A. Khraisat, A. Zembic, R.E. Jung, C.H. Hammerle, Marginal bone levels and soft tissue conditions around single-tooth implants with a scalloped neck design: results of a prospective 3-year study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 28(2), 550–555 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. B.S. McAllister, Scalloped implant designs enhance interproximal bone levels. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 27(1), 9 (2007)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. R. Noelken, T. Morbach, M. Kunkel, W. Wagner, Immediate function with NobelPerfect implants in the anterior dental arch. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 27(3), 277–285 (2007)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. W.G. Van Nimwegen, G.M. Raghoebar, K. Stellingsma, N. Tymstra, A. Vissink, H.J. Meijer, Treatment outcome of two adjacent implant-supported restorations with different implant platform designs in the esthetic region: a five-year randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Prosthodont. 28(5), 490–498 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  66. M. Bateli, W. Att, J.R. Strub, Implant neck configurations for preservation of marginal bone level: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 26(2), 290–303 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  67. S. Bishti, J.R. Strub, W. Att, Effect of the implant–abutment interface on peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Acta Odontol. Scand. 72(1), 13–25 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. R. Adell, U. Lekholm, B. Rockler, P.I. Brånemark, A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int. J. Oral Surg. 10(6), 387–416 (1981)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. T. Albrektsson, G. Zarb, P. Worthington, A.R. Eriksson, The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1(1), 11–25 (1986)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. G. Cardaropoli, U. Lekholm, J.L. Wennström, Tissue alterations at implant‐supported single‐tooth replacements: a 1‐year prospective clinical study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 17(2), 165–171 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. J. Becker et al., Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 34, 1089–1096 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. M. Del Fabbro et al., Platform switching vs standard implants in partially edentulous patients using the dental tech implant system: clinical and radiological results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin. Oral Investig. 19(9), 2233–2244 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. F.C. Lorenzoni et al., Sealing capability and SEM observation of the implant-abutment interface. Int. J. Dent. 2011, 864183 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Molina Rojas DDS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molina Rojas, G., Montalvo Arias, D. (2016). Platform Design. In: Iocca, O. (eds) Evidence-Based Implant Dentistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26872-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26872-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26870-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26872-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics