Abstract
An Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) project estimation process often relies on experts of various backgrounds to contribute judgments based on their professional experience. Such expert judgments however may not be bias-free. De-biasing techniques therefore have been proposed in the software estimation literature to counter various problems of expert bias. Yet, most studies on de-biasing focus on systematic bias types such as bias due to interdependence, improper comparisons, presence of irrelevant information, and awareness of clients’ expectations. Little has been done to address bias due to experts’ memory. This is surprising, knowing that memory bias retrieval and encoding errors are likely to affect the estimation process outcome. This qualitative exploratory study investigates the memory bias situations encountered by ERP professionals, and the possible coping strategies to problems pertaining to those situations. Using interviews with 11 practitioners in a global ERP vendor’s organization, we explicate how experts retrieve and encode stored memory, what kind of errors they experience along the way, and what correction techniques they were using. We found that both errors due to memory retrieval and due to memory encoding seemed to lead to project effort underestimation. We also found that the most common memory correction strategy was the use of mnemonics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Erasmus, P., Daneva, M.: ERP effort estimation based on expert judgments. In: 2013 International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, Mensura 2013, LNCS, pp. 104–109 (2013)
Erasmus, P., Daneva, M.: ERP services effort estimation strategies based on early requirements. In: REFSQ Workshops 2015, pp. 83–99 (2015)
Halkjelsvik, T., Jørgensen, M.: From origami to software development: a review of studies on judgment-based predictions of performance time. Psychol. Bull. 138(2), 238–271 (2012)
Roy, M.M., Christenfeld, N.J.S.: Bias in memory predicts: bias in estimation of future task duration. Mem. Cogn. 35, 557–564 (2007)
Jørgensen, M., Grimstad, S.: Software development estimation biases: the role of interdependence. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 38(3), 677–693 (2012)
Jørgensen, M.: Relative estimation of software development effort: it matters with what and how you compare. IEEE Softw. 30(2), 74–79 (2013)
Jørgensen, M., Grimstad, S.: Avoiding irrelevant and misleading information when estimating development effort. IEEE Softw. 25(3), 78–83 (2008)
Jørgensen, M., Sjøberg, D.I.K.: The impact of customer expectation on software development effort estimates. Int. J. Project Manage. 22, 317–325 (2004)
Yin, R.: Case Study Research Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2012)
Kessel, S.: Self and Consciousness: Multiple Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (1992)
Roediger, H.L.: Reconstructive Memory. In: Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, Oxford (2002)
Burt, C.D.B., Kemp, S.: Construction of activity duration and time management potential. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 155–168 (1994)
Handley, S.J., Thomas, K.E., Newstead, S.E.: The effect of prior experience on estimating the duration of simple tasks. Current Psychol. Cogn. 22, 83–100 (2004)
Thomas, K.E., Newstead, S.E., Handley, S.J.: Exploring the time prediction process: the effect of task experience and complexity on prediction accuracy. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 17, 655–673 (2007)
Christenfeld, R.M., McKenzie, C.: The broad applicability of memory bias and its coexistence with the planning fallacy: reply to Griffin and Buehler (2005). Psychol. Bull. 131, 761–762 (2005)
Block, R.A., Zakay, D.: Prospective and retrospective durations judgments: a meta-analytic review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4, 184–197 (1997)
Fraisse, P.: On the relationship between time management and time estimation. Br. J. Psychol. 90, 33–347 (1963)
Poynter, D.: Judging the duration of time intervals: a process of remembering segments of experience. In: A Life-Span Perspective, pp. 305–322 (1989)
Wallace, M., Rabin, A.I.: Temporal experience. Psychol. Bull. 57, 213–236 (1960)
Koole, S., Van’t Spijker, M.: Overcoming the planning fallacy through willpower: effects of implementation intentions on actual and predicted task-completion times. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 30, 873–888 (2000)
Christenfeld, N.J.S., Roy, M.M.: Effect of task length on remembered and predicted duration. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 202–207 (2008)
Byram, S.J.: Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time predictions. J. Exp. Psychol. 216–239 (1997)
Connolly, T., Dean, D.: Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks. Manage. Sci. 43, 1029–1045 (1997)
Jørgensen, M.: Top-down and bottom-up expert estimation of software development effort. Inf. Softw. Technol. 46, 3–16 (2004)
Molokken-Ostvold, K., Jørgensen, M.: Expert estimation of web-development projects: are software professionals in technical roles more optimistic than those in non-technical roles? Empirical Softw. Eng. 10, 7–29 (2005)
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Ross, M.: Inside the planning fallacy: the causes and consequences of optimistic time prediction. In: Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, pp. 250–270 (2002)
Hinds, P.J.: The curse of expertise: the effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance. J. Exp. Psychol. 205–221 (1999)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective procedures. In: Judgments Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, pp. 414–421 (1982)
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Ross, M.: Exploring the “Planning Fallacy”: why people underestimate their task completion times. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 366–381 (1994)
Kruger, J., Evans, M.: If you don’t want to be late, enumerate: unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 586–598 (2004)
Newby-Clark, I.R., Ross, M., Buehler, R., Koehler, D.J., Griffin, D.: People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 6, 171–182 (2000)
Taylor, S.E., Pham, L.B., Rivkin, I.D., Armor, D.A.: Harnessing the imagination. Am. Psychol. 53, 429–439 (1998)
Griffin, D., Buehler, R.: Biases and fallacies, memories and predictions: comment on Roy, Christenfeld, and McKenzie (2005). Psychol. Bull. 131, 757–760 (2005)
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., MacDonald, H.: The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23, 238–247 (1997)
Remus, W., O’Connor, M., Griggs, K.: Does feedback improve the accuracy of recurrent judgment forecasts? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 66, 22–30 (1996)
Daneva, M.: ERP requirements engineering practice: lessons learned. IEEE Softw. 21(2), 26–33 (2004)
King, N., Horrock, C.: Interviews in Qualitative Research. Sage, London (2010)
Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, London (2007)
Wieringa, R.J., Daneva, M.: Six strategies for generalizing software engineering theories. Sci. Comput. Program. 100 (2015)
Roy, M., Mitten, S., Christenfield, J.: Correcting memory improves accuracy of predicted task duration. J. Exp. Psychol. 14(3) 266
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Erasmus, P., Daneva, M. (2015). An Empirical Study on Memory Bias Situations and Correction Strategies in ERP Effort Estimation. In: Abrahamsson, P., Corral, L., Oivo, M., Russo, B. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9459. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26843-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26844-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)